@polksaladallie wrote:
@poddster wrote:yeah i know there are a few missed words and typos, but I think you will get the gist, if not, then ask for clarification 🙂
I won't say a word, except for the "cue" part.
That's not my job crikey, plenty of scumbags have forged documents
yeah.. They should do it like they do it in Nauru..... 
http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2013/s3928172.htm?site=sydney&program=
The government of Nauru has expelled its resident magistrate and barred its chief justice from returning to the country in an unprecedented move against the island-nation's judiciary.
A rift had earlier opened up between the judiciary and the Nauruan government when the courts granted injunctions stopping the government from deporting two residents.
The judicial leaders have accused president Baron Waqa of abusing the rule of law, saying his interference with the judicial system is politically motivated.
The two judicial figures expelled are both Australian citizens and the orders mean that they cannot return to Nauru, leaving questions over how the Pacific nation's court system will be able to function
PETER LAW: "To not to follow the chief judge's orders and then to cancel his visa really throws any concept of justice out the window. It's really outrageous."
Justice Eames intervened, issuing an injunction against the president's deportation of Peter Law, but that was ignored.
Not only was Peter Law put on a plane back to Australia, the Nauruan president then cancelled Justice Eames' visa, preventing him from returning to Nauru to deal with the matter.
