Buy My "Yes" Vote

 

Warnings have been issued to the eBay seller trying to flog their say in the same-sex marriage postal survey for $1500.
 

A Sydneysider who is selling their ballot paper on the same-sex marriage postal survey has been warned they face possible jail time or a $2000 fine, with an independent senator saying it's making a mockery of the exercise.

 

The eBay listing, which has been taken down, was published on September 18 and titled, Buy My Vote.

The bid started at $1500.

 

"What is this plebiscite worth to you", the seller writes in the ad description.

"The reason I'm selling my vote is because either way I don't care, but thought there are people who do."

 

The seller promises part of the proceeds of the auction will go to help kids battling cancer.

 

The Australian Bueau Of Statistics, which is conducting the survey, told SBS World News it considers any submission of a survey response that's been bought or sold a criminal offence.

 

The offence against the Census and Statistics Act 1905 carries a maximum penalty of $2,100. The Criminal Code offence carries a maximum penalty of 12 months imprisonment,” a spokesman said.

 

http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2017/09/08/same-sex-marriage-sydneysider-slammed-hawking-vote-eba...

 

Woman LOL

 

No way this plebiscite is going to truly reflect the opinion of the general public. It's going to be so skewed.

Message 1 of 150
Latest reply
149 REPLIES 149

Buy My "Yes" Vote


@davidc4430 wrote:

i havent heard anything said regarding a close result or anything regarding rules of the vote, will papers with anything written on them be nul envoid like elections eg: if someone ticks YES then writes 'the govt stinks' on the paper is it still counted?


Having worked on the booths in the past - the quirky remarks are ignored - as they should be.

Message 41 of 150
Latest reply

Buy My "Yes" Vote


@springyzone wrote:

@not_for_sale2017 wrote:

No matter how I try to look at this issue, I can't work out what right heterosexual people have to vote on the right of gay people to marry. It implies heterosexuals represent the norm in the community and have the entitlement and right to make judgement and have input to the lives of gay people. I don't think heterosexuals are that superior. I've known a number of gay people who are just as religious, are upstanding citizens and are genuinely good people. Sure, there are others that don't rate so highly, but one doesn't have to be gay to qualify for that list.


It isn't just heterosexual people who have been given the vote, it is all voters.

I don't see it as the right to make judgements about gay people at all, it is simply looking at the legal definition of marriage.

In every society over hundreds if not thousands of years, that definition has been a man & a woman.  And some of us think the that legal defination is outdated and needs changing.

 

It doesn't mean that gays have not existed or lived in unions too. As we know, in the past some had to hide it as it was illegal etc. Times have changed and I'd guess most people (in the western world) feel gays should be free to live in legally binding unions. If it had any name other than marriage, I think it would be a shoo in.The term *marriage* is not only used to reference the legal union of man and woman. It has been used to define the coupling/joining/ the inter-relationship between two individual items or things.

 

But having said that, having a vote or making a decision about anything is not to suggest that any group is 'superior'. The fact is that heterosexuals ARE the norm in society. Perhaps not as normal as you'ld think   Smiley Wink   

Nature has devised it that way for the perpetuation of the species. And yet, all these normal, hetrosexuals who are the majority in society, are having bi-sexual, homosexual and transexual babies!  Go figure!!   Doesn't make heterosxual people any better or worse morally but whichever way you look at it, they are the majority.     I wonder if that is truly true?? Smiley Wink

 

In a democracy, majority rules. Not just on this issue but any. Our marriage laws eg age at marriage etc affect heterosexuals too.

oh, yes... hetrosexuals who cant get legally married at 15 are so hard done by!  Yet Homosexuals cant get married ...  FULL STOP!!!   tell me again who is most affected ??

There are plenty who don't necessarily agree with them-some may believe the age could be lowered, some believe people should be allowed multiple wives.    Hahaha..... plenty of men would think that one at a time is too many Smiley LOL  Smiley LOL  Our laws can't please everyone. But decisions have to be made. And laws do change over time.

 

No reason why deciding the legal definition of marriage is not relevant to all people, not just gays.   Because atm, its the Homosexuals whom it is very relevant too..




I'm voting YES  Heart

 

********* *********** *********** ************ ************ *********** ***********
Be Kind To Nurses....
They Stop The Doctors From Killing You.
Message 42 of 150
Latest reply

Buy My "Yes" Vote

I used to have a 2nd hand dealers licence.  Things were 'married' in the trade.

 

That is a bottom of something was 'married' to the top of something else to make

it more attractive and saleable.

 

I never thought about it's se xual preferences when I did this.

 

http://www.antiquetrader.com/antiques/furniture_detective_married_furniture_pieces/

 

 

Message 43 of 150
Latest reply

Buy My "Yes" Vote

download.jpg

Message 44 of 150
Latest reply

Buy My "Yes" Vote


@imastawka wrote:

I used to have a 2nd hand dealers licence.  Things were 'married' in the trade.

 

That is a bottom of something was 'married' to the top of something else to make

it more attractive and saleable.

 

I never thought about it's se xual preferences when I did this.

 

http://www.antiquetrader.com/antiques/furniture_detective_married_furniture_pieces/

 

 


It's ironic you mentioned that. Not all that long ago I was interested in an old watch on eBay. The US seller made comment that it wasn't married in any way. I Googled for ages until I found out what it meant. Tis interesting how so many English words are used in various ways.

 

Sorry, I'm off topic.

Message 45 of 150
Latest reply

Buy My "Yes" Vote

I don't think it's off-topic at all.

 

Words are being bandied about concerning marriage is only between a man and a woman.

 

Seems not.

Message 46 of 150
Latest reply

Buy My "Yes" Vote


@the_great_she_elephant wrote:

@icyfroth wrote:

@imastawka wrote:

Mmmmm      Freudian slip?


Nah it was no slip, it was deliberate. Call it journalistic licence if you like lol.


Is that the same as fake news?


Not at all. The news item was copied without alteration. The title was my own adaptation. Surely a person with half a brain could tell the difference?

Message 47 of 150
Latest reply

Buy My "Yes" Vote

The government simply had to uphold the existing law. That's all.

Message 48 of 150
Latest reply

Buy My "Yes" Vote


@bushies.girl wrote:

If you want to vote yes, vote yes, if ya wanna vote no, then do so, if ya dont wanna vote at all, that's your option   ...... Just respect others' choice to have a diffent opinion to you.

 

 

bty Stawka   I lived next door to a lesbian cpl, they were filthy, constantly drunk, fought all the time, smashed up the house, I was so pleased when they were finally asked to leave   ..... 


"I lived next door to a lesbian cpl, they were filthy, constantly drunk, fought all the time"

 

Did you ever try to intervene?

 

Maybe you could have bought them a small pool filled with jello.

Message 49 of 150
Latest reply

Buy My "Yes" Vote


@icyfroth wrote:

@the_great_she_elephant wrote:

@icyfroth wrote:

@imastawka wrote:

Mmmmm      Freudian slip?


Nah it was no slip, it was deliberate. Call it journalistic licence if you like lol.


Is that the same as fake news?


Not at all. The news item was copied without alteration. The title was my own adaptation. Surely a person with half a brain could tell the difference?


Yes, I admit fake news was perhaps not the best description of your adapted title..

Terminological inexactitude would have been much more accurate.

Message 50 of 150
Latest reply