To funny
But then it could be the Bondi winds and Australian climate change thats caused this..... Or maybe it was the Bogans.....
HHmmm better put a carbon tax on the Antarctic
--------------------------------------------------------
2013 was a big year for ice with global sea ice hitting or nearing record highs.
A dramatic example caught the attention of the world Christmas morning, when a vessel hired by group of global warming scientists radioed for help after becoming trapped in ice off Antarctica.
The Russian m/v Akademik Shokalskiy has 74 researchers and crew aboard and they managed to celebrate Christmas despite their frozen predicament.
Chris Turney, who is a professor of climate change at the University of New South Wales, is the leader of the expedition He posted a video to Youtube optimistically predicting that Snow Dragon would reach his position within a few hours, but the ice breaker was forced to turn back. -
Other vessels are headed to the scene and Snow Dragon is waiting and hoping that high winds will push aside some of the ten foot thick ice enabling it to reach the trapped researchers.
The waters around Antarctica experienced remarkable sea ice expansion in 2013 confounding the global warming ice narrative.
Global warming campaigners have been stymied by the lack of any temperature increase in the major temperature data sets since the nineties. (but the alarmist here in Australia and on this forum continue with the scare campaign thats proving to be a huge LIE)
They’ve tried to compensate by feeding the media a steady stream of “extreme weather” stories and with shrill claims about polar ice.
However, historical and scientific data shows today’s weather to be normal.
2013 was in fact particularly tame by many standards with no hurricanes making landfall in the U.S. and data on droughts, fires heat wave, floods, etc. all coming in at or below average.
The global warming campaign seized on northern sea ice in an attempt to find some evidence to show warming.
Northern ice has had a few sparse years recently. Al Gore told COP 15, the UN climate conference in Copenhagen, that the North Pole could be “completely ice free” within five to seven years.
However, 2013 did not cooperate with that narrative either, as northern ice expanded over 50 percent above 2012 levels.
Yachts and research vessels attempting to make news by transiting the Northwest Passage became trapped in the ice and their attempts had to be abandoned. See, Gullible green sailors trapped in the Arctic.
Likewise, alarmist claims about polar bears have run afoul of the facts as polar bear populations continue to expand and
thrive. -
Climate scientists and pressure groups have enjoyed remarkable success at seeing their press statements about polar bears and polar ice reproduced by a compliant media without balance or question.
The information age, however, has granted the public direct access to the unvarnished facts in unprecedented ways.
Web services, such as CFACT’s Climate Depot and social media, publish the data the media ignores.
Global warming hype can’t hold up under the scrutiny.
When the warming crowd attributes fluctuations in northern ice to human activity without basis, and then turns around and blames southern ice expansion on nature, the unbiased observer can’t help but but wonder whether nature is driving both.
Temperature records compiled by NASA, NOAA and the UK Met Office all show no global warming since the nineties, some cooling and very little warming before that.
Climate computer models call for substantial warming which has not occurred. Is the unbiased observer truly to conclude that while nature rules the south, summer northern sea ice will be no more because 2008, for example, was 0.4 degrees above average? This is a classic case of a divorce between correlation and causation, and correlation is no longer looking very good.
Hysterical claims about polar ice are a propaganda talking point aimed to keep the global warming narrative flowing, absent any… well, global warming.
The public continues to catch on.
How long will the legacy media keep reprinting baseless warming claims, without critical examination, when they defy actual data?
Will embarrassing images of yachts and research vessels trapped in ice, which failed to diminish as predicted, help snap the media out of it?
- See more at: http://www.cfact.org/2013/12/28/antarctic-ice-blocks-ice-breaker-sent-to-rescue-climate-researchers-...
@freakiness wrote:
@nero_wulf wrote:what a giggle and a great chuckle watching the alarmist on this thread in their pack attack......
Keep going as you are giving me a wonderful chuckle
What pack attack?
The only pack attacking here is the one in which the fans of the loonie Bolt and co accuse the rest of us of malicious reporting, attacking, ganging up, forming attack packs while attacking other posters themselves. Please don't assume the rest of us play the silly games.
Bolts great.......
@polocross58 wrote:Some people just like to be hysterical and have something to be alarmed about
----------------
Yep
Demand and supply
and those guys sitting around in secret clubs are only to eager to supply to the demand for fear, ignorance, hysteria and alarm
As they say, a sucker is born every minute
It's the backbone of commerce
It's how fortunes are made and grown
Some people WANT desperately to believe in the hoax that is 'climate change'
They the same type who'll run crazily through the streets when the fake 'alien invasions' are staged
They're the ones who'll throw themselves from tall buildings and bridges in fear
The orchestrators know it. They've taken it into account. It doesn't bother them. After all, and as they say, ' You can't make an omellette without breaking some eggs'
So don't be an EGG is the secret 🙂
Dodgy data.......oh, you mean like the IPCC chery picked hockey stick graph........giggle....
I would be surprised if he ever published that.......unless to point out how flawed it is........
Someone on this forum even posted that piece of dodgy data.........
@fincau6 wrote:
@lakeland27 wrote:
@fincau6 wrote:
@lakeland27 wrote:yes i'd like to hear PC explain that too.
i wonder if PC knows that any dingbat can post and alter a wiki entry ? there is no requirement for it to actually be correct.
thats why they love it, fred dingle from longerong can alter a PHD's entry unchallenged pretty much. wiki is known for its anti -expert agenda.
Will this do?
http://www.scribd.com/doc/26753034/The-First-Global-Revolution-Text
page 75 has what you are looking for although you will no doubt say it is a forgery also,AYE?
Ratings:(5 stars) (1)|Views: 14,608|Likes: 32 . so one reviewer (most likely the author) rated the page ?32 likes out of 14,608 page views ?you need to do a lot better than that, and you'll get no more replies from me with the 0 ID either. whats wrong , is the normal id feeling too shy to post with ?Do you want others to help you with everything?You were shown the piece.It exists.But you are so full of pride and arrogance only you can know.You know what you are like.You cannot even deny it.You are a know it all.AYE? Do some research.
sorry, i do know you. hello. everyone here is full of pride and arrogance wouldn't you say ? its the nature of the beast isn't it ? why did you speak ?
''do some research'' i hate to say it, but nobody who posts here can adequately research this material, like anything else it takes time and experience to hone skills to the point where you can actually comprehend it adequately. its no different if you build for example.. the sciences are the same, and each field is specialised. so who is the person best to judge ? the builder judges the science and the scientist the structure ? maybe we ought replace the Priest or Pastor with the guy from the head shop do you think ? i have some odd ideas at times but i don't think it would work somehow .. give the genuine professional in the field his or her due would you ?
