29-12-2013 08:06 PM - edited 29-12-2013 08:08 PM
To funny
But then it could be the Bondi winds and Australian climate change thats caused this..... Or maybe it was the Bogans.....
HHmmm better put a carbon tax on the Antarctic
--------------------------------------------------------
2013 was a big year for ice with global sea ice hitting or nearing record highs.
A dramatic example caught the attention of the world Christmas morning, when a vessel hired by group of global warming scientists radioed for help after becoming trapped in ice off Antarctica.
The Russian m/v Akademik Shokalskiy has 74 researchers and crew aboard and they managed to celebrate Christmas despite their frozen predicament.
Chris Turney, who is a professor of climate change at the University of New South Wales, is the leader of the expedition He posted a video to Youtube optimistically predicting that Snow Dragon would reach his position within a few hours, but the ice breaker was forced to turn back. -
Other vessels are headed to the scene and Snow Dragon is waiting and hoping that high winds will push aside some of the ten foot thick ice enabling it to reach the trapped researchers.
The waters around Antarctica experienced remarkable sea ice expansion in 2013 confounding the global warming ice narrative.
Global warming campaigners have been stymied by the lack of any temperature increase in the major temperature data sets since the nineties. (but the alarmist here in Australia and on this forum continue with the scare campaign thats proving to be a huge LIE)
They’ve tried to compensate by feeding the media a steady stream of “extreme weather” stories and with shrill claims about polar ice.
However, historical and scientific data shows today’s weather to be normal.
2013 was in fact particularly tame by many standards with no hurricanes making landfall in the U.S. and data on droughts, fires heat wave, floods, etc. all coming in at or below average.
The global warming campaign seized on northern sea ice in an attempt to find some evidence to show warming.
Northern ice has had a few sparse years recently. Al Gore told COP 15, the UN climate conference in Copenhagen, that the North Pole could be “completely ice free” within five to seven years.
However, 2013 did not cooperate with that narrative either, as northern ice expanded over 50 percent above 2012 levels.
Yachts and research vessels attempting to make news by transiting the Northwest Passage became trapped in the ice and their attempts had to be abandoned. See, Gullible green sailors trapped in the Arctic.
Likewise, alarmist claims about polar bears have run afoul of the facts as polar bear populations continue to expand and
thrive. -
Climate scientists and pressure groups have enjoyed remarkable success at seeing their press statements about polar bears and polar ice reproduced by a compliant media without balance or question.
The information age, however, has granted the public direct access to the unvarnished facts in unprecedented ways.
Web services, such as CFACT’s Climate Depot and social media, publish the data the media ignores.
Global warming hype can’t hold up under the scrutiny.
When the warming crowd attributes fluctuations in northern ice to human activity without basis, and then turns around and blames southern ice expansion on nature, the unbiased observer can’t help but but wonder whether nature is driving both.
Temperature records compiled by NASA, NOAA and the UK Met Office all show no global warming since the nineties, some cooling and very little warming before that.
Climate computer models call for substantial warming which has not occurred. Is the unbiased observer truly to conclude that while nature rules the south, summer northern sea ice will be no more because 2008, for example, was 0.4 degrees above average? This is a classic case of a divorce between correlation and causation, and correlation is no longer looking very good.
Hysterical claims about polar ice are a propaganda talking point aimed to keep the global warming narrative flowing, absent any… well, global warming.
The public continues to catch on.
How long will the legacy media keep reprinting baseless warming claims, without critical examination, when they defy actual data?
Will embarrassing images of yachts and research vessels trapped in ice, which failed to diminish as predicted, help snap the media out of it?
- See more at: http://www.cfact.org/2013/12/28/antarctic-ice-blocks-ice-breaker-sent-to-rescue-climate-researchers-...
Solved! Go to Solution.
on 30-12-2013 07:33 PM
Miley Cyrus???????????
on 30-12-2013 07:34 PM
advicegiver, i wouldn't say that as i dont think it true. i don't think people foolish for believing in a god at all. i work closely with some people who do without problems. my beef is always with the interpretations and legalism. but i'm no biblical scholar either.
on 30-12-2013 07:46 PM
ok. I know who you are, now, too, and hello.
Why do you think they publish agenda 21? They know what people are like.Why do you think they proclaimed they would have a new world order by consent or conquest?they are powerful and they know it and they do not care what the people think anyway.
So why would they be worried about confirming they created a hoax if they don't care one way or another? And who in their right mind would believe anything they said publicly if they've already admitted they perpetrated a huge hoax on the global population? And what other "hoaxes" did they unleash, anyone wonder about that?
There is a lot going on but while ever the people are around that heap ridicule on people who speak out and cause people to be quiet for fear of being reidiculed then they have no problem.
But in this instance the people who are speaking out their concern for the envrionment are ridiculed, are they not?
Stifle dissent with terms like "denier".
The "deniers" here are the ones that deny any change in the climate and ridicule science that shows otherwise.
Many of you cannot see because if someone comes along tghat does know something you just gang up and ridicule him.then go back to the soap operas and miley cyrus.
You know the WHO stated recently that we are in the post antibiotic era?
Please explain?
You know russia said if they are attacked they will respond with nukes?
Yes
Do any of you know what is really going on?Because of pride and arrogance the truth is not allowed out.
I'd like to see anyone of the general public who knows what's going on, because there's so much information and dis-information happening, currently, thanks to the internet, media and social media it would take a very informed and astute person to seperate the truth from fiction to see what's going on.
And I don't think that sort of person would live very long.
on 30-12-2013 08:14 PM
if the word deniers is considered something which would stiffle discussion ..
what about these ?????
fear mongers
global warming religion
Alarmists,poor alarmists,typical alarmists,no hope for alarmists
people with egg over face
posters of pack attack
a stubborn few who cling to climate change
groovers to disaster and doom
not having more than a quarter of a brain in their skull
enomourers of hoaxes
hysterical and alarmed
guys sitting around in secret clubs are only to eager to supply to the demand for fear, ignorance, hysteria and alarm
suckers
the type who'll run crazily through the streets when the fake 'alien invasions' are staged
the ones who'll throw themselves from tall buildings and bridges in fear
suckers whom...Many of them fell for the evolution furphy.
full of pride and arrogance
viewers of soap operas and miley cyrus ????
on 30-12-2013 08:16 PM
@icyfroth wrote:ok. I know who you are, now, too, and hello.
Why do you think they publish agenda 21? They know what people are like.Why do you think they proclaimed they would have a new world order by consent or conquest?they are powerful and they know it and they do not care what the people think anyway.
So why would they be worried about confirming they created a hoax if they don't care one way or another? And who in their right mind would believe anything they said publicly if they've already admitted they perpetrated a huge hoax on the global population? And what other "hoaxes" did they unleash, anyone wonder about that?
There is a lot going on but while ever the people are around that heap ridicule on people who speak out and cause people to be quiet for fear of being reidiculed then they have no problem.
But in this instance the people who are speaking out their concern for the envrionment are ridiculed, are they not?
Stifle dissent with terms like "denier".
The "deniers" here are the ones that deny any change in the climate and ridicule science that shows otherwise.
Many of you cannot see because if someone comes along tghat does know something you just gang up and ridicule him.then go back to the soap operas and miley cyrus.
You know the WHO stated recently that we are in the post antibiotic era?
Please explain?
You know russia said if they are attacked they will respond with nukes?
Yes
Do any of you know what is really going on?Because of pride and arrogance the truth is not allowed out.
I'd like to see anyone of the general public who knows what's going on, because there's so much information and dis-information happening, currently, thanks to the internet, media and social media it would take a very informed and astute person to seperate the truth from fiction to see what's going on.
And I don't think that sort of person would live very long.
You know the WHO stated recently that we are in the post antibiotic era?
Please explain?
WHO World health organisation.antibiotics are virtually useless because of overuse and because they are in the food chain.Happy days ahead.
on
30-12-2013
08:17 PM
- last edited on
30-12-2013
08:33 PM
by
underbat
@lakeland27 wrote:
advicegiver, i wouldn't say that as i dont think it true. i don't think people foolish for believing in a god at all. i work closely with some people who do without problems. my beef is always with the interpretations and legalism. but i'm no biblical scholar either.
Your beef is with the interpretations?So as long as it fits your criteria it is ok?And I agree that you are not a Biblical Scholar.But in the same breath you would claim i am not either
on 30-12-2013 08:17 PM
@izabsmiling wrote:if the word deniers is considered something which would stiffle discussion ..
what about these ?????
fear mongers
global warming religion
Alarmists,poor alarmists,typical alarmists,no hope for alarmists
people with egg over face
posters of pack attack
a stubborn few who cling to climate change
groovers to disaster and doom
not having more than a quarter of a brain in their skull
enomourers of hoaxes
hysterical and alarmed
guys sitting around in secret clubs are only to eager to supply to the demand for fear, ignorance, hysteria and alarm
suckers
the type who'll run crazily through the streets when the fake 'alien invasions' are staged
the ones who'll throw themselves from tall buildings and bridges in fear
suckers whom...Many of them fell for the evolution furphy.
full of pride and arrogance
viewers of soap operas and miley cyrus ????
Well put together, Iza! Kudos.
on 30-12-2013 08:20 PM
@izabsmiling wrote:if the word deniers is considered something which would stiffle discussion ..
what about these ?????
fear mongers
global warming religion
Alarmists,poor alarmists,typical alarmists,no hope for alarmists
people with egg over face
posters of pack attack
a stubborn few who cling to climate change
groovers to disaster and doom
not having more than a quarter of a brain in their skull
enomourers of hoaxes
hysterical and alarmed
guys sitting around in secret clubs are only to eager to supply to the demand for fear, ignorance, hysteria and alarm
suckers
the type who'll run crazily through the streets when the fake 'alien invasions' are staged
the ones who'll throw themselves from tall buildings and bridges in fear
suckers whom...Many of them fell for the evolution furphy.
full of pride and arrogance
viewers of soap operas and miley cyrus ????
Well you did fall for the evolution lie didnt you?
on 30-12-2013 08:22 PM
evolution - now you're talking....
on 30-12-2013 08:26 PM
@fincau6 wrote:
@izabsmiling wrote:if the word deniers is considered something which would stiffle discussion ..
what about these ?????
fear mongers
global warming religion
Alarmists,poor alarmists,typical alarmists,no hope for alarmists
people with egg over face
posters of pack attack
a stubborn few who cling to climate change
groovers to disaster and doom
not having more than a quarter of a brain in their skull
enomourers of hoaxes
hysterical and alarmed
guys sitting around in secret clubs are only to eager to supply to the demand for fear, ignorance, hysteria and alarm
suckers
the type who'll run crazily through the streets when the fake 'alien invasions' are staged
the ones who'll throw themselves from tall buildings and bridges in fear
suckers whom...Many of them fell for the evolution furphy.
full of pride and arrogance
viewers of soap operas and miley cyrus ????
Well you did fall for the evolution lie didnt you?
I think you've fallen for another hoax, perhaps also by the club of rome, personally.