y7l!~~_7.JPG "jonnjenn"){kind=avatar}
.
Don't expect anything from that one.......never has produced anything relevant..never will....;-)
Has produced a lot of hostile hot air & should stop contributing to "Global Warming" oops sorry it's "Climate Change" now after Kevin got rolled at Copenhagen. :^O
some more info on the leaders of the denial group for half-wits . its the same pattern as with tobbacco and climate. (well they are the same people, you clods may know them as the 'tea party')
This is a guest post by Andrew Rosenberg, director of the Center for Science and Democracy with the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS). It originally appeared on the UCS blog The Equation.
Asbestos can kill you. Weโve all been warned about the dangers of breathing it in. That is why we test buildings for it and have rules to protect construction workers from exposure to it. But how do we know asbestos is harmful? Because scientists have done studies of the dangers it poses to our health. And Iโm glad they have so we can avoid these threats.
Tampering with science behind the health effects of asbestos
For decades, however, some companies have fought efforts to regulate asbestos, even tampering with the science behind our understanding of its health effects. And, sadly, a recent court ruling indicates that the tampering may have been more widespread than anyone previously knew.
Recently, a New York Appeals Court ruled unanimously that that Georgia Pacific, a subsidiary of Koch Industries, must hand over internal documents pertaining to the publication of 11 studies published in reputable scientific journals between 2008 and 2012. At issue in the case: whether the firm can be held accountable for engaging in a โcrime-fraudโ by planting misinformation in these journals intending to show that the so-called chrysotile asbestos in its widely used joint compound doesnโt cause cancer.
FOIA Facts 5 - Finds Friends Of GWPF
People try to paint climate scientists as members of a cabal or conspiracy to hide the truth, but this idea is often promoted by thinktanks, politicians, bloggers, journalists and some economists, members of a tight social network themselves. Their emails are not usually subject to FOIAs, but the FOIA Facts research fortuitously found unexpected data.
Email to Ed Wegman highlighted close relationships between UK's main climate anti-science charity, Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), its counterparts in the US and Canada, and some key Congressional staffers. Many email addresses were quite familiar, with a few surprises, including involvement of AIER, a previously unnoticed thinktank.
In the English-speaking machinery of climate anti-science, GWPF is the main UK gear, seen to be well-meshed with AEI, CATO, CEI, CFACT, GMI, Heartland Institute(HI), ICSC, IER, Mercatus (GMU), PERC, SEPP plus staffers for Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX) and Senator James Inhofe (R-OK), among others.
Read more: FOIA Facts 5 - Finds Friends Of GWPF
