on 12-11-2013 03:34 PM
Clive Palmer challenges ATO, saying he won't pay $6.2m in carbon tax
NEW MP Clive Palmer has dared the Australian Taxation Office to sue his company Queensland Nickel to recover $6.2 million in unpaid carbon tax.
The wealthy Queenslander, who claims to have "retired" from business, said the company would not pay the bill, which it was appealing in the High Court. "We can justifty it to our shareholders," he told the National Press Club in Canberra today following his swearing in in the new parliament. "And the government, if they think they're owed the taxes, they should commence legal proceedings against us.
"We've commenced legal proceedings in the High Court of Australia against them." -
See more at: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/investigations/clive-palmer-challenges-ato-saying-he-wont-pay-6...
on 12-11-2013 04:45 PM
its odd to see a conservative being this honest i agree. but he seems to say things for attention mostly . PUP is merely a vehicle for the mining industry.. form yet another right wing party to ensure control of the senate, as abbott didn't have sufficient support to win both houses. hardly a landslide , a landslide victory gives you control of both houses in your own right.
on 12-11-2013 05:21 PM
he made a good point of removing the provisional tax though..thats a sheepload of money back into the economy
on 12-11-2013 05:31 PM
@45bushy wrote:he made a good point of removing the provisional tax though..thats a sheepload of money back into the economy
Factcheck say this (but i don't take what they say as gospel)
The verdict
It is likely only $60 billion of the $70.1 billion tax receipts forecast for 2013-14 will be collected in instalments.
Experts agree if the policy works, companies may gain some short term benefits through interest income earned on additional bank deposits or investments.
But Mr Palmer makes many assumptions that the additional disposable income during the year will be spent, invested and used productively to generate GST-attributable transactions.
Economic theory studies and historical data show any kind of fiscal stimulus in a low-unemployment economy like Australia's is unlikely to create much impact on the economy, let alone five times.
If it does have an impact, international studies suggest the maximum times the money would change hands in the economy would be twice.
This means the maximum extra GST revenue would only be about $12 billion - not $35 billion.
The studies ABC Fact Check examined also show it is permanent stimuli that create an impact, not temporary or administrative measures such as delays in tax payments.
Mr Palmer's claim is improbable.
on 12-11-2013 06:14 PM