Detroit bankruptcy—the horror of ‘bail-in’

CEC Media release 25/7/2013

 

For a live example of the new “bail-in” policy that Australia’s banking authorities are preparing to legislate here, look at America’s once-great industrial city of Detroit, which declared bankruptcy on 18 July.

 

“Bail-in” essentially is the policy of stealing from the people to prop up banks, and the model is being applied to Detroit with a vengeance.

By declaring bankruptcy, the financial manager appointed to run the city’s finances is able to renege on the city’s obligations to its retired police, firemen and other workers who for their entire working lives paid into city pension funds.

The financial manager, Kevyn Orr, had earlier failed to convince the pension funds to accept major cuts; now, in bankruptcy, he is offering them pennies on the dollar.

But just two days before declaring bankruptcy, Orr struck a deal with the huge Wall Street and City of London banks whose derivatives gambling bets with the city had caused its bankruptcy, such as Bank of America, AIG and UBS, to pay out 75-80 cents on the dollar on the interest rate swap derivatives the banks had sold to the city!

 

Those swaps had been rigged against the city by City of London banks which were caught out last year manipulating the benchmark LIBOR—London Inter-Bank Offered Rate—interest rate.

 

The President of Detroit’s Board of Education, LaMar Lemmons, said of Kevyn Orr in a 21 July interview with LaRouchePAC, “He is in effect a dictator. In the city of Detroit, we have a fascist state… The bankers are being taken care of, the wealthy, the lawyers … have attorneys that are billing the city $1,000 an hour. They’re making millions of dollars off the misery of the City of Detroit, and they are being paid, while they threaten the pensioners.”

 

Between its peak in the 1950s and 2010, Detroit’s population collapsed by more than one million people, from 1.8 million to 700,000, and the decline has continued since.

 

Lemmons reports that the number of students in Detroit’s public schools has fallen from 200,000 to 50,000 in the last four years, and 200 schools have been closed, decimating neighbourhoods. In the remaining schools, 40-60 kids are crammed into classrooms. Real unemployment in Detroit is 50%; the crime rate is sky-high, because the underfunded police department can’t respond to emergency calls; the street lights are out in much of the city; and there are more abandoned buildings and properties in Detroit than in any other city in the world. “The misery index for the city probably eclipses most places in the United States, and in some cases, on the planet Earth,” Lemmons said.

 

Now, with its pensioners being gutted, and other cuts that will be imposed under bankruptcy, Detroit is about to get even worse, all in keeping with the new bail-in model enshrined in law in the US.Dodd-Frank Act 2010, already applied in Cyprus, and also being prepared for Australia.

 

Citizens Electoral Council leader Craig Isherwood declared today, “Detroit is a crime against humanity, unfolding in front of our eyes. Under the bail-in policy, it is the new standard for what will be imposed worldwide, including in Australia.

 

“The fight against bail-in is much bigger than just a fight to save our bank accounts; it is a fight to save our lives—a fight for the principle that the economy serves people, not elite financial interests."

 

I think now would be a good time to make sure your debts and mortgages are settled.

 

 

 

 

Message 1 of 37
Latest reply
36 REPLIES 36

Detroit bankruptcy—the horror of ‘bail-in’


@icyfroth wrote:

we live in an age of information overload


Icy its not just the volume its the half truths and mis presented information, you can often hear two conflicting stories about the same thing

Message 31 of 37
Latest reply

Detroit bankruptcy—the horror of ‘bail-in’

I know Hawk and sometimes I feel it's done deliberately to confuse and confound the public

Message 32 of 37
Latest reply

Detroit bankruptcy—the horror of ‘bail-in’

I believe you are correct, it seems some things are leaked to gauge public reaction and if no one reacts they try to sneak it through.

Message 33 of 37
Latest reply

Detroit bankruptcy—the horror of ‘bail-in’

TH: "Icy its not just the volume its the half truths and mis presented information, you can often hear two conflicting stories about the same thing"

 

I presume you mean CS TH?

 

It is not the volume that is the problem, it is the tendency for "half-truths" to be promulgated without question, hearsay rules, myth trumps, conspiracy spreads.

"I believe", "I think", "I heard", "I read" are often nothing but excuses for:  I can not be bothered checking.

 

When I am researching, if I am taken to a blog, or another Board, I generally give it a miss. The query above apropos Fund rebates was easily checked  by referral to the ATO site,  followed by tables from some health funds.

 

There are many good reputable sources of information  ( ABS, CSIRO, NASA BOM are among my favourites)  which are reliable , and whilst I joust with LL I do agree that the media have a degree of bias. However,  their "definitives"  are normally reliable and not  deserving of LL's ballistic treatment  (apart from that nut Bolt)

nɥºɾ

 

Message 34 of 37
Latest reply

Detroit bankruptcy—the horror of ‘bail-in’

John " "I believe", "I think", "I heard", "I read" are often nothing but excuses for:  I can not be bothered checking."

 

Or they are a personal opinion,  wink

Message 35 of 37
Latest reply

Detroit bankruptcy—the horror of ‘bail-in’

Ok sorry for the delay. I found the letter.

 

On re-reading it, it's not the same as the 30% government rebate and I apologise for the confusion.

 

I tried to copy it for here but the technology is beyond me at this stage, so I've typed it out:

 

15 July 2013

 

Dear Mrs Froth

 

Government changes to Lifetime Health Cover (LHC) loading

 

You may have heard that on 27 June 2013, the Federal Government introduced changes to remove the Austalian Government Rebate from the Lifetime Health Cover (LHC) loading on private health insurance. The change is effective from 1 July 2013 and applies to every health fund including nib.

 

Our records show that you will be affected by the proposed Government changes as 48% LHC  loading  currently applies to your policy. Under the changes, the Government will no longer pay the the private health insurance on the LHC loading component of affected nib customers' premiums, and as a result your premium will increase.

 

It increased by $12.68 per fortnight

 

Here is a link for further information:

 

http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/health-privatehealth-lhi-rebate

 

Private Health Insurance Rebate - removal of the rebate on lifetime health cover loading

Australian Government Rebate on private health insurance and Lifetime Health Cover

 

Private Health Insurance Rebate – removal of the rebate on lifetime health cover loading

 

The Australian Government Rebate on Private Health Insurance (the rebate) will no longer apply to the Lifetime Health Cover (LHC) component of hospital cover premiums.  The changes will realign arrangements under the Private Health Insurance Act 2007 so that all recipients of the rebate receive a comparable benefit relative to their premium, regardless of whether they have a LHC loading or not. 

 

Rebate recipients will be treated consistently subject to age and income.

 

How the Measure will work:

Lifetime Health Cover is a financial loading applied on top of an individual’s hospital premium at a rate of 2% for every year that an individual is over the age of 30 when they take out hospital cover, up to a maximum of 70%. 
Under the measure, the Government no longer pays a rebate on the LHC loading component of the premium.


The LHC loading is removed once an individual has held hospital cover and paid the loading for 10 continuous years.

 

Example:

Doug is 42 years of age and has purchased a $2,000 premium p.a policy, but incurs a LHC loading of 20% because he first purchased private health insurance at age 40. Doug earns a total income of $64,000 p.a and therefore receives a 30% rebate from the Australian Government.

 

Situation before 1 July 2013 –  Total premium payable is $2,400  p.a. The Australian Government contributes $720 p.a through the rebate. Doug pays $1,680 p.a for his private health insurance.
Situation from 1 July 2013 – Total premium payable remains $2,400 p.a. The Australian Government contributes $600 p.a through the rebate.  Doug pays $1,800 p.a for his private health insurance.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Message 36 of 37
Latest reply

Detroit bankruptcy—the horror of ‘bail-in’

That would have confused me too, icy. 🙂
Message 37 of 37
Latest reply