on 20-04-2014 10:21 PM
As it's more than 100 days now, it has been suggested that a new thread was needed. The current govt has been breaking promises and telling lies at a rate so fast it's hard to keep up.
This below is worrying, "independent" pffft, as if your own doctor is somehow what? biased, it's ridiculous. So far there is talk of only including people under a certain age 30-35, for now. Remember that if your injured in a car, injured at work or get ill, you too might need to go on the DSP. They have done a similar think in the UK with devastating consequences.
and this is the 2nd time recently where the Govt has referred to work as welfare???? So when you go to work tomorrow (or tuesday), just remember that's welfare.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-04-20/disability-pensioners-may-be-reassessed-kevin-andrews/5400598
Independent doctors could be called in to reassess disability pensioners, Federal Government says
The Federal Government is considering using independent doctors to examine disability pensioners and assess whether they should continue to receive payments.
Currently family doctors provide reports supporting claims for the Disability Support Pension (DSP).
But Social Services Minister Kevin Andrews is considering a measure that would see independent doctors reassess eligibility.
"We are concerned that where people can work, the best form of welfare is work," Mr Andrews said at a press conference.
on 03-07-2014 08:32 PM
an excellent companion piece to the Joseph Stiglitz article in todays media and not a graph in sight.
Abbott's aimless austerity threatens Australia's prosperity
Nobel prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz is on a media blitz to decisively warn against Hockey and Abbott's woefully misguided economic plan for Australia, writes Alan Austin.
TONY ABBOTT AND JOE HOCKEY have just received three pieces of strategic advice from one of the sharpest tools in the global economics shed. For free.
Professor Joseph Stiglitz from New York City'sColumbia University is in Australia. Stiglitz’s razor edge in global economics was honed teaching at Yale, Princeton and Oxford, and then as chief economist and vice-president of the World Bank in the late 1990s.
He won the 2001 Nobel Prize in economics for researching how markets are distorted by bad information. He shared the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize for his work on climate change.
Messages Stiglitz delivered forcefully this week on ABC Lateline and PM, as well as elsewhere, include:
His timing is fortuitous, with the new Senate about to convene, and several Budget bills up for debate.
On Australia’s progress through the global financial crisis (GFC), Stiglitz was emphatic:
“You have actually had until now remarkably good economic performance. I think Australians may not fully appreciate that you are one of the economies that have actually delivered — that most citizens’ incomes have increased year after year. You have a minimum wage that is twice that of the United States.”
On welfare spending, Stiglitz challenged the recent Federal Budget cuts social services:
“A country’s most important resources are its people. If you don't invest in your children – if you don't invest – make sure they have adequate nutrition, education, health, it will jeopardise your future.”
Stiglitz’s third message confronted head on Abbott’s U-turn since the September election on building Australia’s assets.
In Opposition, Abbott and Hockey hailed their plans to increase the nation’s assets for future prosperity:
“We will build the roads of the 21st century because I hope to be an infrastructure prime minister who puts bulldozers on the ground and cranes into our skies,” Abbott told the 2013 Federal Coalition campaign launch last August.
Now in office, however, Abbott wants to flog off – that is, privatise, or what they now call the Orwellian sounding "asset recycling" – enterprises and infrastructure built by previous generations — assets which, before the election, he claimed
“... determine our quality of life as well as our country’s productivity and prosperity.”
Low global interest rates, Stiglitz claims, offer Australia immediate opportunities for investment:
“If you were a firm and you could borrow at very low interest rates – and Australia, the United States are currently able to borrow at a negative real interest rate – you know, taking into account inflation. And you could take that money and you could invest it in high-return investments in infrastructure, technology, education, in people, in making sure that all of your citizens are able to live up to their potential, then these investments more than pay back.
“We've done studies in the United States where we looked at the return on these public investments across the board and they yield a far higher return than the cost of capital.”
The claim that the private sector operates with less waste than government is, according to Stiglitz, false:
“The private sector wastes a lot. And in fact, no government has ever wasted money on the scale of America's private financial system, which has cost us trillions of dollars. But if you don't make these investments, you're wasting resources.”
03-07-2014 09:55 PM - edited 03-07-2014 09:57 PM
I knew it was too good to last, so back to an "Independent" citizen source, C&P of course. I am trying to emulate !!.
The Age July 2nd.
Revealed: new union corruption
A Melbourne developer has accused Victoria's powerful construction union of demanding he employ union boss John Setka's brother-in-law and his best friend on $70,000 a year jobs in return for securing industrial peace.
Fairfax Media obtained CCTV and other recordings, along with an interview with Peter Chiavaroli, a builder and developer of the old Pentridge prison site in Coburg, which provide an insight into the backroom dealings of union officials, figures aligned with Melbourne's underworld and bikies.
The royal commission into trade union corruption is likely to examine these activities at hearings into the CFMEU in Melbourne next week, including evidence that:
• Victorian Labor Party official and industrial consultant Ken Hardy allegedly told Mr Chiavaroli to work with gangland boss and union fixer Mick Gatto.
• Underworld associate Mario Amenta saying he was dispatched by Mr Setka to "sort out" problems on the old Pentridge prison site. Union officials abused non-union workers, employers were pressured to "give a kicking" to non-union members, and Mr Setka describing one as a "f---ing dog, Turkish painting piece of **bleep**".
• Subcontractors threatening to use Comanchero bikies to collect a disputed debt.
The Pentridge allegations add to previous claims by building companies Boral and Grocon and industry whistleblowers that the CFMEU threatens companies unless they cede to union demands, and will increase pressure on Labor leader Daniel Andrews over Labor's close ties to the union.
In an interview with Fairfax Media, Mr Chiavaroli alleges that in late 2009 Mr Setka demanded the employment of one of his closest friends, Anton Sucic, as a shop steward as part of a campaign to unionise the site.
Mr Setka was the union's assistant secretary when the demand was allegedly made.
Mr Chiavaroli alleged that he was accompanied by Mario Amenta, a concrete company owner who is a close associate of gangland boss Mick Gatto. Mr Amenta once assisted murdered gangster Mario Condello obtain bail.
"I told them I had already made arrangements and I had interviewed someone who was going to start next Wednesday. Setka said, 'no that is not going to happen','' Mr Chiavaroli said. ''He [Setka] didn't ask me, he told me that I must employ his compare, Anton. If I didn't co-operate and employ people he suggested that he would shut down the place for good.''
Of Mr Amenta, Mr Chiavaroli said: ''I was told that he is No.2 behind Mick Gatto and if I wanted to have peace, they could organise it.''
A CCTV recording later captures Mr Chiavaroli discussing with Mr Sucic how Mr Setka had said his hiring ''is not negotiable''.
In a statement, Worksafe said the number of Pentridge safety notices was ''average for the construction industry''. After Mr Sucic left the site in 2010, Mr Chiavaroli said the CFMEU directed him to employ Mr Setka's brother-in-law, Ivan Dadic, or risk an escalation of industrial disruptions, which were by then occurring as the union pushed Mr Chiavaroli to agree to its demands regarding pay and conditions.
Time-sheets from the site reveal Mr Dadic often failed to arrive at work or left early, while CCTV recordings capture him describing how the union coerced workers to join. Mr Dadic is taped saying that if the non-union worker's boss ''doesn't give him a kicking'' then pressure is applied to the company to for it to ''move [the worker] off the site or make him join or pay for him''.
It is illegal to demand a person join or not join a union or to threaten a company if a worker decides not to become a member.
''We don't want to write this down, but that company [employing non-union labour] would be sat in the sheds and pointing the finger at this bloke,'' Mr Dadic says. ''He'd be named and shamed and, if that didn't work, more of the site would be shut down.''
Recordings capture senior union officials becoming abusive after learning that a non-union painter at Pentridge had complained to the Australian Building Construction Commission that the CFMEU attempted to force him to join. In a tape-recorded message, Mr Setka describes the painter as a ''f---ing dog, Turkish painting piece of **bleep**''.
In another recording, union official Gerry Benstead warns Mr Chiavaroli's company against reporting alleged union coercion to the ABCC, which held concerns about the site but was unable to convince witnesses to testify.
''If Johnny Setka hears about that, friggin' that'll be the end of it,'' Mr Benstead says. ''If you go running to the ABCC, forget about it. That will be the worst move you'll ever make.''
In the same recording, Mr Benstead suggests that Mr Chiavaroli's firm work outside of industry laws. At the time, Mr Benstead was pushing for certain workers to be given entitlements opposed by the company.
''Everything works on a bit for youse and a bit for us. Forget about the law, all right,'' he says.
Mr Chiavaroli said several of his contractors who resisted union pressure were told, ''We know where you live and we will get you.''
Mr Chiavaroli has also alleged he hired industry consultant and state ALP official Ken Hardy on a $100,000 a year salary after Mr Hardy claimed to have connections to senior union and Labor figures that would help reduce union disputes. He alleges Mr Hardy suggested making a $50,000 payment to Mick Gatto to ''sort out'' union problems and said that hiring Mr Gatto's crane company would be beneficial.
In a video from the Pentridge Village site, Mr Amenta is taped mediating a payment dispute between sub-contractors and warning that if the issue wasn't resolved, Mr Setka would intervene. ''Now I am here because Setka has rung me [and said], 'Go and f---ing sort it out. Otherwise, I [Setka] am going to go there.' I said, 'John, leave it to me'.'' ''I just don't want him [Setka] to come down here'' to Pentridge. Mr Amenta is also recorded saying how he tried to stop Mr Sucic causing industrial unrest.
''I begged him to walk away from the job. The f---ing problems he was going to cause here, you got no idea.''
In an interview, Mr Chiavaroli said: ''Mario said if I played the card right everything would be OK and we would not be shut down for months and we would probably get up and finish the job.'' Mr Amenta told Fairfax Media Mr Chiavaroli's allegations were ''bull**bleep**''.
The Pentridge site remains only partly finished, having faced financing problems.
In a statement, CFMEU national secretary Dave Noonan defended the union's conduct on the Pentridge site, noting that Mr Chiavaroli was a ''Liberal Party donor'' and said Mr Setka had engaged in no inappropriate activity and would make ''no apology for his [Setka's] passionate fight for safety on a site where a worker has just been killed''.
nɥºɾ
on 03-07-2014 10:01 PM
i believe the anti union thread is elsewhere monman12, would a graph showing where that thread is situated be helpful?
on 03-07-2014 10:22 PM
@monman12 wrote:Now it is obvious why ALP parliamentarians through history have notched up far more jail years for criminal activities, including child sex convictions, than the assorted Coalition parties, : their predilection for dodgy connections, or like minded associates!nɥºɾ
The libs just pay more for legal eagles to get off without conviction or pay off the victim to avoid the courts.
on 04-07-2014 07:25 AM
@cherples wrote:
@monman12 wrote:Now it is obvious why ALP parliamentarians through history have notched up far more jail years for criminal activities, including child sex convictions, than the assorted Coalition parties, : their predilection for dodgy connections, or like minded associates!nɥºɾ
The libs just pay more for legal eagles to get off without conviction or pay off the victim to avoid the courts.
The conservative politicians are in front by a mile when it comes to corrupt criminal behaviour - and when ICAC resumes in NSW they will be leaping even further ahead again. No amount of dodgy posts will change the facts, not even a graph.
on 04-07-2014 07:37 AM
....this is corrupt behaviour ....only my opinion though.
on 04-07-2014 07:45 AM
not that I subscribe to The Australian newspr but, apparently:
.
on 04-07-2014 07:53 AM
more suggestions of 'corrupt' behaviour in the making?.....SHOCKING
on 04-07-2014 02:13 PM
it's come to the Anglican church to tell abbott to listen to science, 10 for effort but i can't see it having any effect on the fool...
Respect climate science: Anglicans urge Tony Abbott to change tack on climate change policies
The Anglican Church has told the Abbott government to change its approach to climate change, urging it to respect and base its policy on scientific evidence.
At a meeting in Adelaide, the church's Australian general synod passed a unanimous motion calling on the government to "respect and act upon relevant independent evidence-based scientific advice’’ on climate change.
The 23 dioceses of the church said they were gravely concerned that Australia’s target to cut carbon dioxide emissions - five per cent below 2000 levels by 2020 - was well short of what was needed.
They said they deeply regretted that it was "future generations and other forms of life" that would "bear the real cost of our heavy dependence on carbon-based energy”.
on 04-07-2014 04:31 PM
How exactly can they force through budget measures or force reform in other ways. Would they use existing legislation to do as much as they can? I wonder what that looks like exactly...