on 20-04-2014 10:21 PM
As it's more than 100 days now, it has been suggested that a new thread was needed. The current govt has been breaking promises and telling lies at a rate so fast it's hard to keep up.
This below is worrying, "independent" pffft, as if your own doctor is somehow what? biased, it's ridiculous. So far there is talk of only including people under a certain age 30-35, for now. Remember that if your injured in a car, injured at work or get ill, you too might need to go on the DSP. They have done a similar think in the UK with devastating consequences.
and this is the 2nd time recently where the Govt has referred to work as welfare???? So when you go to work tomorrow (or tuesday), just remember that's welfare.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-04-20/disability-pensioners-may-be-reassessed-kevin-andrews/5400598
Independent doctors could be called in to reassess disability pensioners, Federal Government says
The Federal Government is considering using independent doctors to examine disability pensioners and assess whether they should continue to receive payments.
Currently family doctors provide reports supporting claims for the Disability Support Pension (DSP).
But Social Services Minister Kevin Andrews is considering a measure that would see independent doctors reassess eligibility.
"We are concerned that where people can work, the best form of welfare is work," Mr Andrews said at a press conference.
on 05-02-2015 11:37 PM
on 05-02-2015 11:39 PM
I will have to find that article I quoted with the OCED corporate tax rates in it tomorrow.. seeing as it appears to be incorrect.
on 05-02-2015 11:56 PM
@am*3 wrote:
I will have to find that article I quoted with the OCED corporate tax rates in it tomorrow.. seeing as it appears to be incorrect.
The Australian, 4/2/2015.
RETIREES have warned Tony Abbott not to fund his childcare package through a 1.5 per cent levy on big business as it would strip about $1.6 billion a year from franking credits, cutting their investment income.
The call came as big business groups intensified their attack on the government’s decision to provide a 1.5 per cent tax cut to small business but not big business, declaring it inequitable and uncompetitive.
The Business Council of Australia and the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry said the nation’s corporate tax take was already the second highest in the OECD.
on 05-02-2015 11:59 PM
@am*3 wrote:
@nevynreally wrote:
@am*3 wrote:
@debra9275 wrote:
What a silly post😀
At least my pic relates to the topic of the sinking govt. So I don't think it's off topic. If I was ranting on about past govt's. I could understand annoyance lolI know.. about the third time he has tried that one..... all were posts about our current (FOR NOW) PM Abbott.
FAIL
So I guess irony is lost on both of you?
I feel these posts are going nowhere. Not any real political content in them.
Okay. responding to posts isn't allowed anymore.
I see tumbleweeds once all the back patting wears off.
on 06-02-2015 12:06 AM
Thank you.
Article quoted......nation’s corporate tax take was already the second highest in the OECD.
mm12 post
OECD Corporate Income Tax Rates
Australia 30%
Japan 37%
Belgium 34%
USA 39.1%
France 34.4%
Portugal 31.5%
Germany 30.1%
If you are interested in real facts (sorry) the weighted average (by GDP) of OECD countries is 32.5%
________________________________________________________________________________________
...nation’s corporate tax take
=
Australia's corporate tax revenue as a proportion of GDP??
06-02-2015 12:08 AM - edited 06-02-2015 12:11 AM
I see tumbleweeds once all the back patting wears off.
Our( collection of random persons) aim will have been met then
Timeframe... late 2016?
8000 posts in 10 months, still got a lot of life left in us yet.
on 06-02-2015 12:26 AM
ATO
The relatively large contribution of corporate income tax is linked to Australia’s higher corporate headline tax rate (30%) relative to the OECD simple average for small and medium sized economies (25%).
It reflects our policy choice to rely more on corporate profits rather than corporate taxes on employee social security contributions and other indirect taxes.
on 06-02-2015 02:59 AM
Is this the theory of "trickle down" economic benefit?
They got it wrong, they're selling us trickle-down economic theory and we're buying trickle-up economic reality where the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.
on 06-02-2015 04:46 AM
What about those who started with nothing (poor) and are now part of the rich or better off ?
Where do they fit into your theory ?
on 06-02-2015 05:44 AM
I thought this was quite well done, having a go at 3 people in 1.