on 20-04-2014 10:21 PM
As it's more than 100 days now, it has been suggested that a new thread was needed. The current govt has been breaking promises and telling lies at a rate so fast it's hard to keep up.
This below is worrying, "independent" pffft, as if your own doctor is somehow what? biased, it's ridiculous. So far there is talk of only including people under a certain age 30-35, for now. Remember that if your injured in a car, injured at work or get ill, you too might need to go on the DSP. They have done a similar think in the UK with devastating consequences.
and this is the 2nd time recently where the Govt has referred to work as welfare???? So when you go to work tomorrow (or tuesday), just remember that's welfare.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-04-20/disability-pensioners-may-be-reassessed-kevin-andrews/5400598
Independent doctors could be called in to reassess disability pensioners, Federal Government says
The Federal Government is considering using independent doctors to examine disability pensioners and assess whether they should continue to receive payments.
Currently family doctors provide reports supporting claims for the Disability Support Pension (DSP).
But Social Services Minister Kevin Andrews is considering a measure that would see independent doctors reassess eligibility.
"We are concerned that where people can work, the best form of welfare is work," Mr Andrews said at a press conference.
on 23-02-2015 01:58 PM
on 23-02-2015 02:02 PM
@tezza2844 wrote:Channel Nine thought his press conference was so important that they switched to the Oscars.
how long did the press conference
go for? oscars didn't start until 12:30
on 23-02-2015 02:08 PM
on 23-02-2015 02:15 PM
@debra9275 wrote:
I don't know and I don't care really
that's nice but i was asking another
poster because i want to know.
on 23-02-2015 02:17 PM
They were not guards but there were armed personnel that were clearly visible in the photos.
where did you see these photos?
can you post them here?
on 23-02-2015 02:19 PM
@*julia*2010 wrote:
@debra9275 wrote:
I don't know and I don't care reallythat's nice but i was asking another
poster because i want to know.
Ok, good, I will leave you to ponder over it then
have a nice day:)
on 23-02-2015 02:22 PM
@debra9275 wrote:
Yeah, I don't like it all Am, the journos aren't terrorists for goodness sakes
I think it includes bloggers etc as well, not just professional journalists .
on 23-02-2015 02:23 PM
@*julia*2010 wrote:They were not guards but there were armed personnel that were clearly visible in the photos.
where did you see these photos?
can you post them here?
Search them up, they shouldn't be that hard to find.
I don't know if they're in the report or not.
on 23-02-2015 02:23 PM
@am*3 wrote:
@debra9275 wrote:
Yeah, I don't like it all Am, the journos aren't terrorists for goodness sakesI think it includes bloggers etc as well, not just professional journalists .
many professional journalists are bloggers.
on 23-02-2015 02:25 PM
It's taking away democracy and freedom of speech under the guise of terrorism