As it's more than 100 days now, it has been suggested that a new thread was needed. The current govt has been breaking promises and telling lies at a rate so fast it's hard to keep up.
This below is worrying, "independent" pffft, as if your own doctor is somehow what? biased, it's ridiculous. So far there is talk of only including people under a certain age 30-35, for now. Remember that if your injured in a car, injured at work or get ill, you too might need to go on the DSP. They have done a similar think in the UK with devastating consequences.
and this is the 2nd time recently where the Govt has referred to work as welfare???? So when you go to work tomorrow (or tuesday), just remember that's welfare.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-04-20/disability-pensioners-may-be-reassessed-kevin-andrews/5400598
Independent doctors could be called in to reassess disability pensioners, Federal Government says
The Federal Government is considering using independent doctors to examine disability pensioners and assess whether they should continue to receive payments.
Currently family doctors provide reports supporting claims for the Disability Support Pension (DSP).
But Social Services Minister Kevin Andrews is considering a measure that would see independent doctors reassess eligibility.
"We are concerned that where people can work, the best form of welfare is work," Mr Andrews said at a press conference.
@monman12 wrote:"What's with all the boring pink myopics and matriarch's stuff repeated ad nauseam then? Who is that intended for?
If I wrote "............all the boring pink myopics and matriarch's ............." G58 would castigate me" But who am I to argue, so I agree with you A3
Current PM is a blue tie wearing male. I know that, but who is the bloke on the left?
Another example of twaddle.
"vicr directed we don't need to give links for quotes ... anyone who wants to know where stuff comes from 'google it' was the instructions.."
Be that as it may, the post reads:
"am*3 wrote:
Australia's treasurer Joe Hockey will have to go to a G20 follow-up meeting in Washington this week with unmet policy commitments..................."
This is a return to C&P sans original comments with no indication that is another persons work
However, I could easily tell it was copied because of its "presentation", but no quotation marks?
Perhaps de facto Plagiarism? which "is the act of representing as one's own original work the creative works of another, without appropriate acknowledgment of the author or source."
@monman12 wrote:
However, I could easily tell it was copied because of its "presentation", but no quotation marks?
Perhaps de facto Plagiarism? which "is the act of representing as one's own original work the creative works of another, without appropriate acknowledgment of the author or source."
If only the same comments were directed at the other posters who routinely post without acknowledging the author or publication.
