Diary of our stinking Govt.

As it's more than 100 days now, it has been suggested that a new thread was needed.  The current govt has been breaking promises and telling lies at a rate so fast it's hard to keep up.Woman Happy

 

This below is worrying, "independent" pffft, as if your own doctor is somehow what? biased, it's ridiculous. So far there is talk of only including people under a certain age 30-35, for now. Remember that if your injured in a car, injured at work or get ill, you too might need to go on the DSP. They have done a similar think in the UK with devastating consequences.

 

and this is the 2nd time recently where the Govt has referred to work as welfare???? So when you go to work tomorrow (or tuesday), just remember that's welfare.

 

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-04-20/disability-pensioners-may-be-reassessed-kevin-andrews/5400598

 

Independent doctors could be called in to reassess disability pensioners, Federal Government says

 

The Federal Government is considering using independent doctors to examine disability pensioners and assess whether they should continue to receive payments.

 

Currently family doctors provide reports supporting claims for the Disability Support Pension (DSP).

But Social Services Minister Kevin Andrews is considering a measure that would see independent doctors reassess eligibility.

 

"We are concerned that where people can work, the best form of welfare is work," Mr Andrews said at a press conference.

 

Message 1 of 17,615
Latest reply
17,614 REPLIES 17,614

Re: Diary of our stinking Govt.

How do you make 3 sentences into 3 paragraphs?  And the sentence I posted I didn't even C and P properly skipping the end of the sentence.

 

 

did you miss that Julia?😛

 

 

anyway, enough of the nit-picky posts 

 

what do you think about China rejecting our shipments of coal considering we have just signed that FTA agreement?

 

 

 

Message 13581 of 17,615
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking Govt.

One sentence Julia, but who really cares

 

 

are you asking who really cares about  posting

INCORRECT information?

Message 13582 of 17,615
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking Govt.

And the sentence I posted I didn't even C and P properly skipping the end of the sentence.

 

 

what do you mean?

 

looks to me like you got the whole sentence.

 

are we looking at the same article?

 

 

 

 

 

Message 13583 of 17,615
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking Govt.

There is not much difference between one sentence and 2. 5 sentences out of a whole article that covers a liberal party fund raising event, not a protest and not even one picture of any protestors. 

 

Not being a deeceptive type of person, i posted the whole Article  so it could be read. 

 

 

I couldn't care less if it has one or three sentences about the protest as the article is about the lnp fund raiser which was actuaLly a pretty boring read.

 

 

Anything else??

 

 

I am interested to hear any thoughts you may have on any  real issues, like China rejecting the shipments of coal

Message 13584 of 17,615
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking Govt.

anyway, enough of the nit-picky posts 

 

 

its not nitpicking.

 

you posted misleading comment stating

the abc dedicated only ONE LINE in the 

WHOLE article to the protest.

 

correcting misinformation is not nitpicking.

 

i pointed it out, corrected it, that should have

been the end of it.  

 

Message 13585 of 17,615
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking Govt.


@*julia*2010 wrote:

anyway, enough of the nit-picky posts 

 

 

its not nitpicking.

 

you posted misleading comment stating

the abc dedicated only ONE LINE in the 

WHOLE article to the protest.

 

correcting misinformation is not nitpicking.

 

i pointed it out, corrected it, that should have

been the end of it.  

 


lol

 

It's nitpicking when it goes to the left

 

When it goes to the right it's "quoting sources correctly" 

 

 

Message 13586 of 17,615
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking Govt.

"The ABC did not cover the protest, and that is that, to make It sound as if they did is poor form but hey, that's nothing new"

 

What silly obfuscation, how on earth my referring twice to the FACT that the ABC COVERED THE VISIT makes it sound as if they covered the protest

 

However,  I await confirmation of this "definitive" comment :

"so whoever said the ABC covered the protest was INCORRECT"

 

Hands up "whoever "

 

Myopic Tongues2 Small.jpg

 

PS

Why not let this silly story rest,  because  it appears that having reached rock bottom,  apropos facts, all that is happening is that further posts are being produced by a few swinging pickaxes.

 

 

 

 

Message 13587 of 17,615
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking Govt.

speaking of real issues;

 

did the rotating flags issue end up 

being sorted out?  can't remember...

Message 13588 of 17,615
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking Govt.

I take that as a firm " no " then, just as I expected. Lol


My point was that the ABC did not cover the protest nor post any pics of the protest and it was pretty irrelevant to bring up the ABC's article in the first place as it had very little to do with the protest and lack of reporting on it as was being discussed ( though it did prove AB's point)

(Most would get that without me having to explain it though)


The flags?? we're waiting for 12 flag speech 😃
Message 13589 of 17,615
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking Govt.

I take that as a firm " no " then

 

 

yep!  you got it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Message 13590 of 17,615
Latest reply