on 20-04-2014 10:21 PM
As it's more than 100 days now, it has been suggested that a new thread was needed. The current govt has been breaking promises and telling lies at a rate so fast it's hard to keep up.
This below is worrying, "independent" pffft, as if your own doctor is somehow what? biased, it's ridiculous. So far there is talk of only including people under a certain age 30-35, for now. Remember that if your injured in a car, injured at work or get ill, you too might need to go on the DSP. They have done a similar think in the UK with devastating consequences.
and this is the 2nd time recently where the Govt has referred to work as welfare???? So when you go to work tomorrow (or tuesday), just remember that's welfare.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-04-20/disability-pensioners-may-be-reassessed-kevin-andrews/5400598
Independent doctors could be called in to reassess disability pensioners, Federal Government says
The Federal Government is considering using independent doctors to examine disability pensioners and assess whether they should continue to receive payments.
Currently family doctors provide reports supporting claims for the Disability Support Pension (DSP).
But Social Services Minister Kevin Andrews is considering a measure that would see independent doctors reassess eligibility.
"We are concerned that where people can work, the best form of welfare is work," Mr Andrews said at a press conference.
27-07-2015 12:12 PM - edited 27-07-2015 12:12 PM
just repeating this bit:
Labor's spokesman Gary Gray moved a resolution at the party's conference on the weekend calling for greater transparency in political donations.
Labor wants the disclosure threshold reduced from $13,000 to $1000. The ALP voluntarily discloses all donations above $1000 even though it is not obliged to do so.
Mr Gray also wants real time reporting of political donations so voters can be aware of when powerful interests donate cash to parties and the timing of policy formulation.
- political donations would be from unions and corporations
I still agree with Labor on that
on 27-07-2015 12:56 PM
Just repeating this:
However rather than accepting $-largesse from gaming companies, Poor Me handed out some of her own with a forked tongue promise to Wilkie to obtain his support, which she quickly reneged upon after luring Slipper into the paddock.
Indeed , Clubs NSW, which represents the cashed-up, pokie dominated clubs of NSW, certainly did contribute funds (to both parties), but Gillard sold her soul to Clubs NSW when she reneged upon her written agreement with Wilkie.
on 27-07-2015 12:59 PM
@debra9275 wrote:just repeating this bit:
Labor's spokesman Gary Gray moved a resolution at the party's conference on the weekend calling for greater transparency in political donations.
Labor wants the disclosure threshold reduced from $13,000 to $1000. The ALP voluntarily discloses all donations above $1000 even though it is not obliged to do so.
Mr Gray also wants real time reporting of political donations so voters can be aware of when powerful interests donate cash to parties and the timing of policy formulation.
- political donations would be from unions and corporations
I still agree with Labor on that
the article is dated 27th July 2015
I still agree with Labor in this, disclosure of all political donations ( both union and corporate)
on 29-07-2015 11:48 AM
Looks like Barny had his hissy fit to the media but didn't make any submissions as Minister for Ag during the approval process.
on 29-07-2015 02:11 PM
@the_great_she_elephant wrote:So Hockey is criticising her, Abbott and Pyne are defending her, everybody else is putting in their three pennyworth, but ole brer Fox(Turnbull) is lying low and saying nothing.
As I was saying:
on 29-07-2015 02:22 PM
he's a character
floating around somewhere is a petition calling on her to resign with almost 70,000 signatures
29-07-2015 02:26 PM - edited 29-07-2015 02:27 PM
that's what I always thought despite what he's said publicly Gleee- will have to wait and see what happens next
on 29-07-2015 02:33 PM
@monman12 wrote:Just repeating this:
However rather than accepting $-largesse from gaming companies, Poor Me handed out some of her own with a forked tongue promise to Wilkie to obtain his support, which she quickly reneged upon after luring Slipper into the paddock.
Indeed , Clubs NSW, which represents the cashed-up, pokie dominated clubs of NSW, certainly did contribute funds (to both parties), but Gillard sold her soul to Clubs NSW when she reneged upon her written agreement with Wilkie.
I can't help feeling that cliches (sold her soul) and cheap insults (Poor Me) are just a tad counterproductive coming from someone purporting to bring logic and intelligence into the argument. They don't inspire confidence in your credibility.
on 30-07-2015 12:02 AM
" can't help feeling that cliches (sold her soul) and cheap insults (Poor Me) are just a tad counterproductive coming from someone purporting to bring logic and intelligence into the argument. They don't inspire confidence in your credibility."
"Sold her soul" is indeed a cliche, but where Wilke was concerned, sadly a fact., as was Gillard's deal with the devil-Greens
Poor Me is actually not a "cheap insult" but a cheap fact. I wonder if people like Merkle, Thatcher, Clinton (H), Bhutto (B) bemoaned what the "boys" said or called them?
"are just a tad counterproductive" ?? Within this somewhat pink matriarchal thread where facts are sometimes not exactly de rigueur , chuckle.
"they don't inspire confidence in your credibility." Chuckle. I repeat that this is a somewhat politically pink matriarchal thread, and credibility is in the pink eye of the beholder to the point that demonstrably incorrect comments attract the attention of the Kudos tag-team, as do the ubiquitous C&P,s
"a tad counterproductive" Really, so why the post?
30-07-2015 01:24 AM - edited 30-07-2015 01:26 AM
"hope you went and checked your portfolio
especially if you hadn't noticed a "crisis"
sorry if you only found out about it here'
I am not really tempted to rely on definitive information herein, and am still awaiting external information apropos the alluded to "crisis",
Anyway the XAO appears to have missed ALL the crisis: