on 20-04-2014 10:21 PM
As it's more than 100 days now, it has been suggested that a new thread was needed. The current govt has been breaking promises and telling lies at a rate so fast it's hard to keep up.
This below is worrying, "independent" pffft, as if your own doctor is somehow what? biased, it's ridiculous. So far there is talk of only including people under a certain age 30-35, for now. Remember that if your injured in a car, injured at work or get ill, you too might need to go on the DSP. They have done a similar think in the UK with devastating consequences.
and this is the 2nd time recently where the Govt has referred to work as welfare???? So when you go to work tomorrow (or tuesday), just remember that's welfare.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-04-20/disability-pensioners-may-be-reassessed-kevin-andrews/5400598
Independent doctors could be called in to reassess disability pensioners, Federal Government says
The Federal Government is considering using independent doctors to examine disability pensioners and assess whether they should continue to receive payments.
Currently family doctors provide reports supporting claims for the Disability Support Pension (DSP).
But Social Services Minister Kevin Andrews is considering a measure that would see independent doctors reassess eligibility.
"We are concerned that where people can work, the best form of welfare is work," Mr Andrews said at a press conference.
on 16-08-2015 02:58 PM
This is just a chat board though Deb. A place for a laugh and a bit of banter. It's not a national newspaper. I'm surprised what the media seem to be able to get away with these days although I did see Bolt and Miranda having a good old go at Fairfax news this morning.
on 16-08-2015 03:01 PM
@j*oono wrote:This is just a chat board though Deb. A place for a laugh and a bit of banter. It's not a national newspaper. I'm surprised what the media seem to be able to get away with these days although I did see Bolt and Miranda having a good old go at Fairfax news this morning.
Big sister to the rescue lol.
16-08-2015 03:04 PM - edited 16-08-2015 03:05 PM
that's just silly- and nit-picking
th e photo of abbott has exactly what to do with terrorism?? most people regard terrorism as a very serious issue btw. I know i didn't post that one either
the picture of abbott and the female LNP candidtate I assume was made up as abbott said the woman was 'sexy' and I doubt very much whether any newspaper gave that picture "reach" by publishing it
. Tania Pilbarsek does not associate with terrorists, but she is pictured in a newspaper standing alongside them and smiling as if she is a terrorist sympathiser
on 16-08-2015 03:05 PM
excuse me??
I don't need rescuing
on 16-08-2015 03:07 PM
Good grief. Deb, you know ten times more about politics than I ever will LOL. Unless someone meant that you had been under attack 😄
16-08-2015 03:08 PM - edited 16-08-2015 03:09 PM
Joono I expect things will get much worse in the weeks/months to follow
I expect it's just deflection
kind of funny though
on 16-08-2015 03:09 PM
that's just silly- and nit-picking
you wrote it.
debra9275 wrote:
So in your opinion that makes it OK to photo shop someone's clothing, surroundings and people they are with- I'll keep that in mind next time they do it to someone
on 16-08-2015 03:11 PM
ummmJulia, abbott was actually standing with that woman- whereas Tania Pilbersek was not standing amongst terrorists, you seem to be missing that rather big point
on 16-08-2015 03:12 PM
This is just a chat board though Deb. A place for a laugh and a bit of banter.
the abbott & scott pic was shared by tracey spicer
on her social media page accompanied by disgusting
remarks.
on 16-08-2015 03:16 PM
but it was not published in a newspaper with an accompanying story was it?
I have no idea or interest in what Tracy Spicer posts where. but I do tend to see newspaper headlings.. rather catching placing Pilbersek in the middle of terrorists. dressed like a muslim and smiling don't you think?
anyway, this conversation is silly
so will leave you to it