on 20-04-2014 10:21 PM
As it's more than 100 days now, it has been suggested that a new thread was needed. The current govt has been breaking promises and telling lies at a rate so fast it's hard to keep up.
This below is worrying, "independent" pffft, as if your own doctor is somehow what? biased, it's ridiculous. So far there is talk of only including people under a certain age 30-35, for now. Remember that if your injured in a car, injured at work or get ill, you too might need to go on the DSP. They have done a similar think in the UK with devastating consequences.
and this is the 2nd time recently where the Govt has referred to work as welfare???? So when you go to work tomorrow (or tuesday), just remember that's welfare.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-04-20/disability-pensioners-may-be-reassessed-kevin-andrews/5400598
Independent doctors could be called in to reassess disability pensioners, Federal Government says
The Federal Government is considering using independent doctors to examine disability pensioners and assess whether they should continue to receive payments.
Currently family doctors provide reports supporting claims for the Disability Support Pension (DSP).
But Social Services Minister Kevin Andrews is considering a measure that would see independent doctors reassess eligibility.
"We are concerned that where people can work, the best form of welfare is work," Mr Andrews said at a press conference.
on 13-01-2015 10:58 AM
13-01-2015 11:00 AM - edited 13-01-2015 11:02 AM
How very very interesting !!!. Now a realty check (sorry) :
It would appear that selective C&Ps are again on view, or just truncated perhaps? In the article I discovered these comments:
"According to AEC records, the Free Enterprise Foundation has declared the $200,000 donation but the federal Liberal Party has not.......................A spokesman for the AEC said the commission did not comment on individual cases................."The primary intention of the financial disclosure scheme is to achieve disclosure and that intention has been met in this instance," he said."
Some history in the same vein:
SMH 23013
The Labor caucus has endorsed reforms to the way political parties are funded amid criticism from independent MP Andrew Wilkie that the the government and Coalition have done a "grubby deal" over the changes.
SMH 2013:
"The ALP disclosed total donations of $131,500, although donors said they gave $912,891.
I do wonder at the (self-righteous ) comments often expressed mainly by the Myops apropos politics, when if they removed their pink filters they might notice that both colours behave in similar fashion.
nɥºɾ
It is somewhat "paradoxical" that the above image could be also applied to BOTH parties view (and rightly so) of a hip-pocket sensitised electorate bleating: "gimme gimme".
on 13-01-2015 11:05 AM
@watta*drama*queen wrote:
@icyfroth wrote:
@aps1080 wrote:
@am*3 wrote:Stop commenting on my personal circumstances - you don't even know if I have a job, 6 jobs or no job.. or what my future plans are.
Not every household is a one income household you know.
Anyone that follows unemployment trends are well aware of how seasonal, casual part time jobs can alter the data.
Whoopie - fruit picking jobs increase the number of jobs available for a few months a year.. how exciting for everyone looking for a full time job.
I'll comment on what I want to comment on, especially if the information is public domain.
if you aren't a one income household, that answers a lot then doesn't it.
Do YOU EVER intend to get a job where the salary is more then $50,000 ?
Sitting at the computer all day making comments on social media doesn't pay much, unfortunately.
It would appear that sitting at the computer all day making comments on social media is better paid for by an employer
Er, Icy works for herself and so do I.
on 13-01-2015 11:07 AM
@boris1gary wrote:13/01/15 for those that can't seem to remember what the date is, although I understand why they wish to live in the past - such embarrassment and shame for the cheer squad of the LyingNP
abbotts LyingNP worst government ever
I see that was replied to Debra, I think you need to make sure am3 reads it, plus a few others of your lot
since it is you who couldn't stick to the current Gov't so now the date doesn't matter !
Late to the party again boris, PLEASE do try to keep up
13-01-2015 11:13 AM - edited 13-01-2015 11:15 AM
on 13-01-2015 11:21 AM
on 13-01-2015 11:23 AM
13-01-2015 11:28 AM - edited 13-01-2015 11:29 AM
Actually Abbott missed voting on 5 key matters in 2009, due to being asleep in his office after a heavy drinking session.
2009
Tony Abbott once missed five key votes in Parliament
TONY Abbott missed the key economic vote of the new Parliament - the $42 billion fiscal stimulus package - because he fell asleep after a night of drinking witnessed by MPs from both sides of Parliament.
Mr Abbott told Chief Opposition Whip Alex Somlyay that he missed five divisions on the night of Thursday, February 12 because he fell asleep in his office.
His nap followed dinner in the Members' Dining Room with Peter Costello, Kevin Andrews and Peter Dutton, where numerous bottles of wine were consumed.
Treasurer Wayne Swan, in the midst of a speech on the Government's response to the global economic crisis, noted the absence of high-profile Liberal MPs.
"The Member for Higgins (Mr Costello), as this vital debate in the history of the country is going on, is currently in the dining room,'' he said at 10.10pm.
"He is currently in the dining room with the Member for Menzies (Mr Andrews). He is currently in the dining room with the Member for Warringah (Mr Abbott).
"That is what they think about the strategy ... those on that side of the house.''
By 11.35pm, when the bells for the division on the Government's Nation Building and Job Plan legislation sounded, Mr Costello, Mr Dutton and Mr Andrews had returned to the chamber to vote.
But Mr Abbott was absent. Hansard records show he missed five votes that evening - he had not requested leave and was not paired with a Government MP.
The Warringah MP was asleep in his office.
Herald Sun
on 13-01-2015 11:29 AM
am3
You are repeating yourself, first sign of problems
Suggest you go to the doctors
on 13-01-2015 11:30 AM
@nero_bolt wrote:
Who's the woman?