Diary of our stinking opposition

Labor frontbencher Andrew Leigh shifts position on previous support for a GP fee

Labor's shadow assistant treasurer Andrew Leigh was once a strong supporter of a compulsory fee for visits to the doctor - a policy now slammed by the opposition as a “GP tax” that would hurt the community’s most vulnerable.

 

But in a 2003 Sydney Morning Herald article Dr Leigh, then a PhD student in economics at Harvard University, argued a Medicare co-payment was “hardly a radical idea”.

 

“As health researchers have shown, cost-less medical care means that people go to the doctor even when they don't need to, driving up the cost for all of us," Dr Leigh and co-author Richard Holden wrote.

 

“But there's a better way of operating a health system, and the change should hardly hurt at all.

 

“As economists have shown, the ideal model involves a small co-payment - not enough to put a dent in your weekly budget, but enough to make you think twice before you call the doc."

 

Dr Leigh argued the fee should be enough to deter “frivolous GP visits”, but not enough to limit genuine preventive care. The fee should apply to everyone, including pensioners, except those who are chronically ill, he wrote.

 

Dr Leigh, who has opposed the proposal in media appearances over recent weeks, told Fairfax Media: "Since 2003, a lot has changed in the health care system, and I've changed my view on co-payments.

 

 “A GP co-payment was originally a Hawke government proposal led by Brian Howe, a member of the Left faction,” he said.

 

“As long as it is applied fairly across the community, a co-payment is a perfectly valid policy measure. If Andrew Leigh, before he had to toe the party line, recognised that then I welcome his contribution to the debate. I respect Andrew Leigh as a sensible economist.”

 

On Saturday, Dr Leigh, a former professor of economics at the Australian National University, distanced himself from an article he wrote in 2004 supporting fee deregulation for universities – another policy opposed by Labor.

 

http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/labor-frontbencher-andrew-leigh-shifts-positio...

 

Yes, it’s the very well respected ALP whey-faced Dr Andrew Leigh who virtually declared his previous books and speeches as mere works of fiction. This brings into sharp focus Dr Leigh's economics degree.

Message 1 of 393
Latest reply
392 REPLIES 392

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition


@myoclon1cjerk wrote:

The treatment of Gillian Triggs and the accusations leveled at Save The Children.Very honourable indeed.


Your compass needs calibrating.

Message 31 of 393
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition

 Bill Shorten has made himself a small target as opposition leader

 

In opposition, Tony Abbott was accused of adopting a small-target strategy.

 

But the current opposition leader, Bill Shorten, has made himself an even smaller target, giving at least 200 fewer interviews and perhaps as many as 400 fewer while avoiding hostile commercial media outlets and commentators such as Andrew Bolt, Alan Jones and Ray Hadley.

 

An analysis by Fairfax Media of the pair's media outings in 2011 and 2014 respectively – each man's first full year as opposition leader after a federal election – has also prompted questions in the Labor caucus among MPs about the opposition's strategy.

 

While Mr Shorten has promised 2015 will be a year of ideas for the ALP, some sections of the caucus believe the opposition is not capitalising on the Abbott government's political woes to define itself and announce more policies. Labor has so-far released only a handful of policies, including on multi-national tax avoidance and $70 million extra for family violence critical services.

Advertisement


The comparative analysis of publicly available published transcripts shows Mr Abbott gave 457 radio and TV interviews, press conferences and shorter "doorstop" interviews in 2011, while Mr Shorten gave just 265 in the equivalent 2014 period.

 

 

The publicly available information shows both men faced the scrutiny of the Canberra press gallery about the same number of times – 47 times for Mr Abbott and 54 times for Mr Shorten – and both men spoke to the ABC about the same number of times – 40 times for Mr Abbott and 45 times for Mr Shorten.

 

But in a carefully calibrated media strategy, Mr Shorten is clearly avoiding potentially risky radio interviews, particularly in New South Wales, which has the greatest number of lower house seats and in which Jones and Hadley occupy pre-eminent positions.

Mr Shorten also appears to dislike breakfast television, making just two appearances on the Nine Network's Today show and five on the Seven Network's Sunrise in 2014, compared to 31 and eight by Mr Abbott in 2011.

 

ANU professor of political marketing Andrew Hughes said Mr Shorten risked becoming known as "Invisibill" because of his "small target, small policy" strategy.

 

"Shorten is clearly making Abbott do the running and then jumping on his mistakes," he said.

"The more Abbott speaks, the less Bill will, so the differences are noticed, even if the policy differences are small."

 

"It's a good strategy in that it minimises the harm that can be done, but it also shows they [Labor] must be worried about his depth and the depth of their policies."

 

Entire Article Here

 

bill fall.jpg

 

shows how low the ALP has fallen.

 

 

Message 32 of 393
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition

I like this part at the bottom of the article

 

 

 

But three MPs, who also spoke on condition of anonymity, defended Mr Shorten's small target strategy and pointed out the leadership group – including Chris Bowen, Tanya Plibersek, Anthony Albanese and Penny Wong – were also prominent media performers.

"Why should we get in the way when the Liberals are killing themselves? We are ten points up in the polls," that MP said.

A second MP said the caucus was largely satisfied with Mr Shorten and that "Abbott keeps shooting himself in the foot, it's hard to compete".

A third MP said that "even with great leaders there is room for improvement" and added "look how well we are doing in the polls".

 

so true, especially this part Abbott keeps shooting himself in the foot 

 

shorten is most probably just sitting back, laughing quietly  Woman LOL

Message 33 of 393
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition


@debra9275 wrote:

I like this part at the bottom of the article

 

 

 

But three MPs, who also spoke on condition of anonymity, defended Mr Shorten's small target strategy and pointed out the leadership group – including Chris Bowen, Tanya Plibersek, Anthony Albanese and Penny Wong – were also prominent media performers.

"Why should we get in the way when the Liberals are killing themselves? We are ten points up in the polls," that MP said.

A second MP said the caucus was largely satisfied with Mr Shorten and that "Abbott keeps shooting himself in the foot, it's hard to compete".

A third MP said that "even with great leaders there is room for improvement" and added "look how well we are doing in the polls".

 

so true, especially this part Abbott keeps shooting himself in the foot 

 

shorten is most probably just sitting back, laughing quietly  Woman LOL


Which is very much looking like that's all he'd be good at as a PM.

Message 34 of 393
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition

I'm not so sure that he will be leader when labor gets voted in next year, will have to wait and see what happens

Message 35 of 393
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition

The article criticizes Bill Shorten for not making an appearance with Jones, Bolt or Hadley. After Jones' infantile scalding of Julia Gillard for arriving a few minutes late and his revolting comments about her father, is it any wonder? Nobody who disagrees with Bolt's opinion will get anything like a fair hearing and Hadley, the lesser of three evils, is still more of an attack dog than a commentator.

 

Tony hasn't even got the gumption to appear on Q&A. Although he's not likely to be warmly embraced by the whole studio audience, I'm sure his treatment there would be a lot more civilized than Shorten could expect by fronting the shock jocks.

Message 36 of 393
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition

I don't watch bolt's show, but everyone's laughing on twitter saying he wants to get rid of the senate    Woman LOL

Message 37 of 393
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition

Bill Shorten ‘gave thousands’ to ALP branch stacker, claims Kathy Jackson

 

BILL Shorten has been accused of handing thousands of dollars in cash to a Victorian Labor “branch stacker” to pay for ALP memberships.

 

The potentially damaging claim against the federal Labor leader came from Health Services Union whistleblower Kathy Jackson just minutes before the ­conclusion of her evidence to the royal commission into union ­corruption yesterday.

 

Ms Jackson, who exposed ­convicted former HSU bosses ­Michael Williamson and Craig Thomson over large-scale fraud, admitted to the commission that she had used HSU union money running to thousands of dollars to pay for ALP memberships.

 

But in a surprise move, she then dropped Mr Shorten in the middle of rort allegations by claiming he told her one weekend at his house that he had given money to the same ALP branch stacker just after she had given the man $7000.

 

“That weekend when I did speak to Mr Shorten about giving Mr (David) Asmar the $7000, he laughed and said that he had also given him money, and you know, ‘the **bleep** must have double-dipped’ that week or that month,” Ms Jackson said.

 

According to Ms Jackson, the alleged payments occurred before Mr Shorten entered parliament in 2007, when he was national and Victorian secretary of the Australian Workers Union, a leader of the Victorian ALP’s Right faction and a senior office bearer in the party. The HSU whistleblower was on friendly terms with Mr Shorten at the time and a factional ally, although the pair later fell out; the relationship between them is now poisonous.

 

The alleged ALP branch-stacker, Mr Asmar, worked for Victorian ALP senator and faction boss Stephen Conroy.

 

Ms Jackson made the Shorten allegation after admitting she took HSU union cash for Mr Asmar from a “little steel box” that she regarded as a leftover kitty from “sitting fees” for monthly or quarterly committee of management meetings when she led the HSU No 1 branch in Victoria from 1996 to 2010. She said she withdrew $8000 for each meeting in union cash, and paid 13 other committee members $100 each to cover their travel ­expenses.

 

[...]

 

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/investigations/bill-shorten-gave-thousands-to-alp-branch-stacke...

 

The allegations by Ms Jackson are serious. Of course we must assume Mr Shorten innocent until the allegations are proven but it must make the rusted-on ALP supporters and others feel rather uncomfortable. Is Mr Shorten worthy of adulation and the position of opposition leader or are people attracted to his potential hybristophilia?

Message 38 of 393
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition

hahahahaha, Kathy Jackson?  Seriously?

 

What's Marco Bolano got to say? Have they threatened Brad Norington over his weekend story yet?

Message 39 of 393
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition

hmm Kathy Jackson- credible??

 

http://www.smh.com.au/national/unionist-kathy-jackson-to-go-on-trial-as-bid-for-delay-due-to-house-f...

 

Controversial unionist Kathy Jackson will go on trial for the alleged theft of $1.4 million after a Federal Court judge rejected a bid to adjourn the civil case against Ms Jackson as her house caught fire last week.

The house fire in Wombarra, north of Wollongong, is being treated by authorities as suspicious, and is the latest drama to involve Ms Jackson. Previously dubbed a "heroic" whistleblower by Tony Abbott for exposing corruption in the Health Services Union, she is now accused of large-scale fraud.

 

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-10-14/kathy-jackson-mentally-unwell-to-defend-herself-against-fraud/...

 

Health Services Union (HSU) figure Kathy Jackson is too mentally unwell to defend herself against claims she misappropriated union funds, the Federal Court in Melbourne has heard.

The HSU is pursuing Ms Jackson for almost $1.4 million for allegedly misusing the funds of members

 

https://independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/kathy-jackson-back-in-federal-court,7330

 

Will Kathy Jackson finally run out of excuses and front up this Friday at the Federal Court to explain the alleged misappropriation of approximately $1.4 million in union funds? Peter Wicks reports.

ON FRIDAY this week, the Federal Court once again catches up with Kathy Jackson.

Jackson will return to court to attempt to explain the alleged misappropriation of approximately $1.4 million in union funds.

This case has dragged on for close to two years now and attempts to have Jackson actually explain herself have been met with excuse after excuse along with numerous failures to comply with court orders. Enough failures to comply to prompt Justice Tracey to state:

"I am conscious of the many inexcusable failures to comply with the court's orders. It's a matter that I have taken very seriously."

Let’s hope Justice Tracey is still in that frame of mind on Friday.

 

 

 

Message 40 of 393
Latest reply