Diary of our stinking opposition

Labor frontbencher Andrew Leigh shifts position on previous support for a GP fee

Labor's shadow assistant treasurer Andrew Leigh was once a strong supporter of a compulsory fee for visits to the doctor - a policy now slammed by the opposition as a “GP tax” that would hurt the community’s most vulnerable.

 

But in a 2003 Sydney Morning Herald article Dr Leigh, then a PhD student in economics at Harvard University, argued a Medicare co-payment was “hardly a radical idea”.

 

“As health researchers have shown, cost-less medical care means that people go to the doctor even when they don't need to, driving up the cost for all of us," Dr Leigh and co-author Richard Holden wrote.

 

“But there's a better way of operating a health system, and the change should hardly hurt at all.

 

“As economists have shown, the ideal model involves a small co-payment - not enough to put a dent in your weekly budget, but enough to make you think twice before you call the doc."

 

Dr Leigh argued the fee should be enough to deter “frivolous GP visits”, but not enough to limit genuine preventive care. The fee should apply to everyone, including pensioners, except those who are chronically ill, he wrote.

 

Dr Leigh, who has opposed the proposal in media appearances over recent weeks, told Fairfax Media: "Since 2003, a lot has changed in the health care system, and I've changed my view on co-payments.

 

 “A GP co-payment was originally a Hawke government proposal led by Brian Howe, a member of the Left faction,” he said.

 

“As long as it is applied fairly across the community, a co-payment is a perfectly valid policy measure. If Andrew Leigh, before he had to toe the party line, recognised that then I welcome his contribution to the debate. I respect Andrew Leigh as a sensible economist.”

 

On Saturday, Dr Leigh, a former professor of economics at the Australian National University, distanced himself from an article he wrote in 2004 supporting fee deregulation for universities – another policy opposed by Labor.

 

http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/labor-frontbencher-andrew-leigh-shifts-positio...

 

Yes, it’s the very well respected ALP whey-faced Dr Andrew Leigh who virtually declared his previous books and speeches as mere works of fiction. This brings into sharp focus Dr Leigh's economics degree.

Message 1 of 393
Latest reply
392 REPLIES 392

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition

Who cares what Mr Shorten does. Mr Abbott is going to get 7 point stars onto our flag.

Now, that's an achievement.

Message 291 of 393
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition


@icyfroth wrote:

So you think Mr Shorten will be able to achieve 50% renewable energy by 2030 (if he's re-elected)?


I think that toxic tony is our idiot PM at the present moment, Shorten may be able to achieve this if he is elected PM

Message 292 of 393
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition

Anonymous
Not applicable

i wonder which way its gonna go;

watching the labor conference atm

 

powerful speech by t burke in support

of turning the boats back.

 

Message 293 of 393
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition

Anonymous
Not applicable

Protestors disrupt Labor MP Andrew Giles as he commences the debate on refugee policy.

 

 

Several minutes were lost as security and party officials wrestled the protesters off the stage, prompting the newly elected ALP National President Mark Butler to call for a better behaviour.


 

 

Message 294 of 393
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition

Anonymous
Not applicable

so...an important win for shorten.

Message 295 of 393
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition


@tezza2844 wrote:

@icyfroth wrote:

So you think Mr Shorten will be able to achieve 50% renewable energy by 2030 (if he's re-elected)?


I think that toxic tony is our idiot PM at the present moment, Shorten may be able to achieve this if he is elected PM


How do you think Mr Shorten will acheive this without (further) bankrupting the country? Renewable energy has to date not been economically viable, it has needed to be government subsidised to be able to be even implemented so far.

We are still relying on approx. 90% energy from coal burning sources.

Message 296 of 393
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition


@*julia*2010 wrote:

so...an important win for shorten.


Woman LOL

Message 297 of 393
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition

 

 

The ALP will prioritise climate change action via higher prices, operate in lock-step with the trade unions, flirt with quasi-protectionist economics, downplay market-based reforms and champion a litany of progressive causes: female equality, same-sex marriage, indigenous recognition and the republic.

 

At a time when Reserve Bank governor Glenn Stevens warns that Australian growth is falling to permanently lower levels — the implication being that stalled economic reform has diminished living standards — Labor offers phony words and hollow policy.

It is locked into the old politics and mistakes, playing to its loyalists and institutional interests.

 

Shorten is a weak leader trying to look strong. He is conspicuously devoid of policy strength. The lesson of Shorten’s leadership, illustrated by his speech yesterday, is the limits of leadership. Nearly everything he does is about adaptation to Labor power realities, ideological orthodoxies, trade unions and polling. He is driven to defy party sentiment on asylum-seeker boats for only one reason: the current policy is a veto on election victory.

 

These tactics overall should deliver Labor a formidable election campaign. It will be competitive. But Shorten’s latest ploy, the 50 per cent renewables electricity target by 2030, reveals all the problems.

 

This is plain irresponsible policy. It means Labor has no interest in the most cost-effective method of tackling emissions across the next 15 years.

It has no interest in trying to combat climate change consistent with a competitive growth economy. Labor can duck and weave but it cannot escape financial reality: the cost of renewables remains vastly more expensive than fossil fuels.

 

Anyone with half a political brain sees through this ploy. Because Shorten knows he must fight on climate change and because he knows pricing carbon risks another “carbon tax” scare, he wants to redefine the contest to “who loves renewables the most”.

Abbott’s ineptitude invites such easy exploitation.

 

The upshot is that Shorten has shifted much of Labor’s policy response on to the single most ineffective and high-cost mechanism.

He will punish Australian households and businesses with high costs in the interests of his own political convenience and vote-buying. It is the essence of trashing the public interest for party political gain.

 

At least when Abbott was being irresponsible he merely promised to abolish a tax.

 

In his speech yesterday, Shorten’s election vision was “more solar panels on Australian rooftops” and more farmers “putting wind turbines on their land”.

It sounds like a joke from a satire program. Sadly, it’s not. The party faithful, evidently, think this is terrific. It is the latest example of how far Labor has sunk.

 

Shorten pretends he’s being bold. In fact, he’s being weak. Expect that the carbon pricing commitment via an emissions trading scheme will be downgraded. Instead of Labor relying on carbon pricing with the renewable energy target becoming less necessary, Labor seems to be moving in the opposite direction. This is Shorten Labor: 100 per cent political expediency and defective policy.

 

Entire Article Here

 

Mr Potato- Head strikes again. Why not a revised Pink Batts Scheme while he's at it? Create more jobs lol.

 

 
Message 298 of 393
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition

A shocking conference and a wake up to all Australians that Labor will stop at nothing, even jettisoning their core beliefs to regain power. Shame on them.

Message 299 of 393
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition

Pink batts! and never mind the 4 people they killed with that scheme and the thousands they killed by opening our borders. Shame on them

Message 300 of 393
Latest reply