Diary of our stinking opposition

Labor frontbencher Andrew Leigh shifts position on previous support for a GP fee

Labor's shadow assistant treasurer Andrew Leigh was once a strong supporter of a compulsory fee for visits to the doctor - a policy now slammed by the opposition as a “GP tax” that would hurt the community’s most vulnerable.

 

But in a 2003 Sydney Morning Herald article Dr Leigh, then a PhD student in economics at Harvard University, argued a Medicare co-payment was “hardly a radical idea”.

 

“As health researchers have shown, cost-less medical care means that people go to the doctor even when they don't need to, driving up the cost for all of us," Dr Leigh and co-author Richard Holden wrote.

 

“But there's a better way of operating a health system, and the change should hardly hurt at all.

 

“As economists have shown, the ideal model involves a small co-payment - not enough to put a dent in your weekly budget, but enough to make you think twice before you call the doc."

 

Dr Leigh argued the fee should be enough to deter “frivolous GP visits”, but not enough to limit genuine preventive care. The fee should apply to everyone, including pensioners, except those who are chronically ill, he wrote.

 

Dr Leigh, who has opposed the proposal in media appearances over recent weeks, told Fairfax Media: "Since 2003, a lot has changed in the health care system, and I've changed my view on co-payments.

 

 “A GP co-payment was originally a Hawke government proposal led by Brian Howe, a member of the Left faction,” he said.

 

“As long as it is applied fairly across the community, a co-payment is a perfectly valid policy measure. If Andrew Leigh, before he had to toe the party line, recognised that then I welcome his contribution to the debate. I respect Andrew Leigh as a sensible economist.”

 

On Saturday, Dr Leigh, a former professor of economics at the Australian National University, distanced himself from an article he wrote in 2004 supporting fee deregulation for universities – another policy opposed by Labor.

 

http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/labor-frontbencher-andrew-leigh-shifts-positio...

 

Yes, it’s the very well respected ALP whey-faced Dr Andrew Leigh who virtually declared his previous books and speeches as mere works of fiction. This brings into sharp focus Dr Leigh's economics degree.

Message 1 of 393
Latest reply
392 REPLIES 392

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition

I really think this Shorten is showing early signs of dementia, he repeats himself all the time and forgets names. That's a sure sign. Oh and he forgot all his crooked deals whilst being a union heavy.

Message 343 of 393
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition


@djilukjilly wrote:

......early signs of dementia, he repeats himself all the time.....


Now who does that remind me of?

 

https://youtu.be/eLEx-cf6Jdw

 

"We are more than happy, we are more than happy, to take the shackles off QANTAS. We are more than happy to take the shackles off QANTAS, and that's what we want to do."

Message 344 of 393
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition

Woman LOL  I loved that show Cros

 

 

the weirdest interview I've ever seen was this one

 

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-09-09/abbott-says-stopping-boats-has-helped-economy/6763240

 

 

maybe he didn't hear the questions when he gave the wrong answers?

 

it was just, well... very weird!

Message 345 of 393
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition

It's bizarre, Deb. It's as if he turned up with a set of prepared answers ready to go, regardless of what questions Leigh Sales asked.

 

And it wasn't the only times that he bragged to an interviewer about stopping the boats, in reply to a completely unrelated question.

Message 346 of 393
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition

moonflyte
Community Member

Looks like labor is going back to the future and fighting an election on the very things that saw them lose.

Message 347 of 393
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition


@village_person wrote:

 

Although dismissed yesterday as a minor issue by historian Keith Windschuttle, Mr Shorten was slightly off in suggesting Botany Bay was the home of the first British penal colony.

 According to Australian government websites, the First Fleet arrived at Botany Bay on January 18 in 1788 after Joseph Banks had declared the territory suitable for a penal colony after returning from a journey there in 1770.

 But Captain Arthur Phillip, the fleet’s commander, “found the ­location unsuitable because the harbour was unsafe and the area lacked freshwater” and quickly relocated to Port Jackson.

 After moving further into the harbour, on January 26, 1788, Phillip raised the British flag at Sydney Cove and 751 convicts and their children disembarked, along with 252 marines and their families.

 

 It appears that they did actual settle in the Botany Bay area from 18/20 January 1788 but decided very very quickly that it was unsuitable for more thatn one reason and moved further north.

The First Fleet left England on 13th May 1787 for the 'lands beyond the seas' - Australia, stopping at Tenerife, Rio de Janeiro and Cape Town, where food supplies were replenished. The fleet arrived at Botany Bay between 18th and 20th January 1788. However, this area was deemed to be unsuitable for settlement so they moved north arriving at Port Jackson on the Australian East coast on 26 January 1788 after deciding that Botany Bay was not suited for a settlement due to its lack of fresh water - even though it had been recomended by Captain James Cook in 1770 as a possible location for a settlement. Botany Bay had other shortcomings as well, it was open to the sea, making it unsafe for the ships and Captain Arthur Phillip (the Colony's first Governor) considered the soil around Botany Bay was poor for crop growing

(http://www.historyaustralia.org.au/ifhaa/ships/1stfleet.htm)

Message 348 of 393
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition

moonflyte
Community Member

Great start for negative Bill Shorten is to get himself gagged straight off . This is going to be a very negative election campaign from Labor.

Message 349 of 393
Latest reply

Re: Diary of our stinking opposition

why?

Message 350 of 393
Latest reply