Diary of our stinking opposition

Labor frontbencher Andrew Leigh shifts position on previous support for a GP fee

Labor's shadow assistant treasurer Andrew Leigh was once a strong supporter of a compulsory fee for visits to the doctor - a policy now slammed by the opposition as a “GP tax” that would hurt the community’s most vulnerable.

 

But in a 2003 Sydney Morning Herald article Dr Leigh, then a PhD student in economics at Harvard University, argued a Medicare co-payment was “hardly a radical idea”.

 

“As health researchers have shown, cost-less medical care means that people go to the doctor even when they don't need to, driving up the cost for all of us," Dr Leigh and co-author Richard Holden wrote.

 

“But there's a better way of operating a health system, and the change should hardly hurt at all.

 

“As economists have shown, the ideal model involves a small co-payment - not enough to put a dent in your weekly budget, but enough to make you think twice before you call the doc."

 

Dr Leigh argued the fee should be enough to deter “frivolous GP visits”, but not enough to limit genuine preventive care. The fee should apply to everyone, including pensioners, except those who are chronically ill, he wrote.

 

Dr Leigh, who has opposed the proposal in media appearances over recent weeks, told Fairfax Media: "Since 2003, a lot has changed in the health care system, and I've changed my view on co-payments.

 

 “A GP co-payment was originally a Hawke government proposal led by Brian Howe, a member of the Left faction,” he said.

 

“As long as it is applied fairly across the community, a co-payment is a perfectly valid policy measure. If Andrew Leigh, before he had to toe the party line, recognised that then I welcome his contribution to the debate. I respect Andrew Leigh as a sensible economist.”

 

On Saturday, Dr Leigh, a former professor of economics at the Australian National University, distanced himself from an article he wrote in 2004 supporting fee deregulation for universities – another policy opposed by Labor.

 

http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/labor-frontbencher-andrew-leigh-shifts-positio...

 

Yes, it’s the very well respected ALP whey-faced Dr Andrew Leigh who virtually declared his previous books and speeches as mere works of fiction. This brings into sharp focus Dr Leigh's economics degree.

Message 1 of 393
Latest reply
392 REPLIES 392

Diary of our stinking opposition


@debra9275 wrote:

are they?? the editor of the DT would know for sure  Woman LOL

 

those "faceless" men must've told him-maybe it came to him in a dream??


You're starting to sound a lot like Mr Shorten there, Deb Woman LOL

Message 261 of 393
Latest reply

Diary of our stinking opposition

Yes, that would be great.  Tania Plibersek would be a very good leader.  Penny Wong as deputy, or vice versa even.

Joono
Message 262 of 393
Latest reply

Diary of our stinking opposition

why do you say that??

 

 

how would an editor of the Daily telegraph know what the  Labor party are doing? do they invite him to their meetings/conversations?  I don't think so   Woman LOL

 

 

I've never been a big fan of Shorten's and i don't think it will make much difference whether he goes or stays,

Message 263 of 393
Latest reply

Diary of our stinking opposition


@debra9275 wrote:

why do you say that??

 

 

how would an editor of the Daily telegraph know what the  Labor party are doing? do they invite him to their meetings/conversations?  I don't think so   Woman LOL

 

Pretty sure the editor of the DT, or any editor of any other newpaper would have a lot of contacts and sources about the politics of either party than you or I would know.

 

 I've never been a big fan of Shorten's and i don't think it will make much difference whether he goes or stays,

 

I agree with you there. It's always been my opinion that he's only the caretaker for the position until the next election.


 

Message 264 of 393
Latest reply

Diary of our stinking opposition

Pretty sure the editor of the DT, or any editor of any other newpaper would have a lot of contacts and sources about the politics of either party than you or I would know.

 

 

i'm pretty sure the editor of the daily telegraph makes up stuff, going by past articles. as they are very pro abbott govt. I think they would be the last to know anything about the politics of the labor party.

Message 265 of 393
Latest reply

Diary of our stinking opposition

Stick to Fairfax, because if there is enough money in the coffers and malice in the editors heart, they  can afford to libel on behalf of the pro ALP , all in the name of politics.

 

Myopic Tongues2 Small.jpg

Message 266 of 393
Latest reply

Diary of our stinking opposition

I actually really like Crikey

 

http://www.crikey.com.au/2015/02/02/mayne-which-corporations-donated-to-put-tony-abbott-in-the-lodge...

 

 

but I really think ABC is the best

Message 267 of 393
Latest reply

Diary of our stinking opposition


@debra9275 wrote:

Pretty sure the editor of the DT, or any editor of any other newpaper would have a lot of contacts and sources about the politics of either party than you or I would know.

 

 

i'm pretty sure the editor of the daily telegraph makes up stuff, going by past articles. as they are very pro abbott govt. I think they would be the last to know anything about the politics of the labor party.


Hate to disagree with the making up stuff, All the editors and writers of the Murdoch press do report exactly what Rupert instructs them to report regardless of their "contacts"

Message 268 of 393
Latest reply

Diary of our stinking opposition

 

Hogg's gunning for Shorten 'all about Maxine'

 

So former ALP national secretary Bob Hogg reckons Bill Shorten should resign after his performance at Dyson Heydon's royal commission.

Hogg says the Opposition Leader has been shown to have a conflict of interest when he was the secret.... Not everyone is convinced by Hogg's stated motivation.

 

"It's all about Maxine," is the view of a fair wad of the Labor Party.

Hogg's partner is Maxine McKew, the former ABC television host who stunned the political establishment by beating John Howard in 2007.

 

It was a short political career. She lost Bennelong three years later to tennis commentator-turned-Liberal MP John Alexander.

On the night of her loss, McKew made it clear who she blamed for her cruel change of fortune.

She was furious about the toppling of Kevin Rudd.

And as any waiter in any Chinese restaurant on Sussex Street worth their MSG-laced salt could tell you, McKew remains filthy at the power brokers who masterminded the kill: David Feeney, Don Farrell, Mark Arbib and man of the moment Bill Shorten.

 (Those same waiters could also tell you McKew's detractors reckon her crazy-brave decision to ban negative advertising in her 2010 campaign didn't help either. Nor did her legendary ban of doorknockers wearing "Your Rights at Work" T-shirts.)

Now of course we're not accusing Hogg of a conflict of interest himself. His position could be entirely independent to his partner's experience.

We just thought we'd throw it in by way of context as, once again, the old party rips itself apart.

Message 269 of 393
Latest reply

Diary of our stinking opposition

moonflyte
Community Member

Every time I read a members hate rant against Murdoch and his papers I have to laugh....why?? well because the reach of the ABC is enormous, its  octopus tentacles reaching into every media avenue there is and there's no restriction to it.

 

Never hear a word about that though.

Message 270 of 393
Latest reply