on 20-03-2015 08:17 AM
Labor frontbencher Andrew Leigh shifts position on previous support for a GP fee
Labor's shadow assistant treasurer Andrew Leigh was once a strong supporter of a compulsory fee for visits to the doctor - a policy now slammed by the opposition as a “GP tax” that would hurt the community’s most vulnerable.
But in a 2003 Sydney Morning Herald article Dr Leigh, then a PhD student in economics at Harvard University, argued a Medicare co-payment was “hardly a radical idea”.
“As health researchers have shown, cost-less medical care means that people go to the doctor even when they don't need to, driving up the cost for all of us," Dr Leigh and co-author Richard Holden wrote.
“But there's a better way of operating a health system, and the change should hardly hurt at all.
“As economists have shown, the ideal model involves a small co-payment - not enough to put a dent in your weekly budget, but enough to make you think twice before you call the doc."
Dr Leigh argued the fee should be enough to deter “frivolous GP visits”, but not enough to limit genuine preventive care. The fee should apply to everyone, including pensioners, except those who are chronically ill, he wrote.
Dr Leigh, who has opposed the proposal in media appearances over recent weeks, told Fairfax Media: "Since 2003, a lot has changed in the health care system, and I've changed my view on co-payments.
“A GP co-payment was originally a Hawke government proposal led by Brian Howe, a member of the Left faction,” he said.
“As long as it is applied fairly across the community, a co-payment is a perfectly valid policy measure. If Andrew Leigh, before he had to toe the party line, recognised that then I welcome his contribution to the debate. I respect Andrew Leigh as a sensible economist.”
On Saturday, Dr Leigh, a former professor of economics at the Australian National University, distanced himself from an article he wrote in 2004 supporting fee deregulation for universities – another policy opposed by Labor.
Yes, it’s the very well respected ALP whey-faced Dr Andrew Leigh who virtually declared his previous books and speeches as mere works of fiction. This brings into sharp focus Dr Leigh's economics degree.
on 06-05-2016 06:36 PM
on 12-05-2016 05:02 PM
The ALP has been forced to disendorse one of its candidates. He is a thug.
Election 2016: Fremantle candidate Chris Brown formally disendorsed by Labor
Labor's former candidate for the federal seat of Fremantle, Chris Brown, has been formally disendorsed by the party after revelations he did not disclose convictions from the 1980s.
However Mr Brown has said claims he assaulted a police officer were wrong.
The ALP's state executive has endorsed the Deputy Mayor of Fremantle, Josh Wilson, as Mr Brown's replacement.
Mr Brown has told the ABC he was charged with assault after an altercation at a festival in 1985 in which he made contact with a police officer, who had pulled him to his feet after he had been punched.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-05-12/chris-brown-formally-disendorsed-by-alp/7408652
ABC News; a reliable news source unlike the other mob.
on 18-05-2016 08:32 AM
ALP MP Mr Feeney has been bathing in the River Lethe.
David Feeney has 'serious questions to answer' over failure to declare $2.3 million house, Adam Bandt says
Labor frontbencher David Feeney has admitted his failure to declare a $2.3 million house on his parliamentary register of interests was an oversight.
"I have today written to the register of members interests seeking to rectify my register so that the property is properly found therein," he told ABC's AM.
Mr Feeney confirmed to AM both the Northcote house and a second investment property located in Seddon were negatively geared, despite Labor's current policy to wind back negative gearing concessions for existing properties should it win the election.
As I have already said even the Mafia refuse to accept any Australian politicians as job applicants.
on 18-05-2016 08:38 AM
on 18-05-2016 09:28 AM
@esayaf wrote:
While we are on the subject of the Mafia don't forget that Amanda Vanstone released a well known Mafia kingpin from detention onto our streets and then senior Liberals attended parties with this criminal.
So the Mafia might not accept any politicians but the Liberals accept Mafia money
C'mon esayaf, don't let your history lesson pull up at Amanda Vanstone. If we're going to enjoy a trip in the time machine let's get our money's worth.
Michael Rudy Tham (sometimes known as Rudy Michael Tham or Rudy Tham) (1923? – 5 October 1998) was a San Francisco Teamsters Union leader with alleged mafia connections
Throughout his career, Tham was dogged by allegations of misconduct.[1] Numerous accounts also say that he was associated with James Fratianno, a known Mafia member. Fratianno claimed that he had an interest in a union dental plan being organised by Tham and himself. If successful, Fratianno said, he would collect $10,000 a month from dentists' kickbacks and "phony" medical claims
Former Australian Prime Minister Bob Hawke acknowledged that in 1978, through Tham, he met with Sal Amarena, a mafia associate, in what Mr Hawke described as an incidental meeting.[16] Mr Hawke, then President of the Australian Council of Trade Unions, was en route to Vancouver to attend a conference of the Socialist International congress and had a stop-over in San Francisco
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It seems as if the ALP wrote the playbook about Mafia affiliations.
on 18-05-2016 10:04 AM
hmmm an" incidental" meeting in 1978- that means an 'accidental meeting' doesn't it??
on the other hand Ms Vanstone was a bit more complicit in granting a visa and intervening in the case of a known mafia figure facing deportation
http://www.smh.com.au/national/vanstone-quizzed-in-mafia-case-20091109-i5d1.html
on 18-05-2016 10:54 AM
@debra9275 wrote:hmmm an" incidental" meeting in 1978- that means an 'accidental meeting' doesn't it??
http://www.smh.com.au/national/vanstone-quizzed-in-mafia-case-20091109-i5d1.html
It was just an innocent meeting Debra. Mr Hawke asked him the time and the response was "6 o'clock".
Oooops! there goes another flying pig.
on 18-05-2016 11:03 AM
amanda??
on 19-05-2016 08:34 AM
20-05-2016 08:33 AM - edited 20-05-2016 08:34 AM
It seems as if Mr Feeny, alleged politician, finds a new house he owns every week. By the end of the election campaign he might own about 20 or so. To forget one house is understandable but to forget 4 is questionable.
Fancy his missus having a family trust; I thought only nasty capitalists set up trust funds to protect their wealth.
Federal election 2016: Labor’s million-dollar houses of cards exposed
Bill Shorten’s election campaign will be rocked by revelations about a fourth property in the multi-million-dollar real estate portfolio of frontbencher David Feeney and his lawyer wife.
And it emerged last night that Mr Feeney stays at the unit during parliamentary sitting weeks, claiming a lucrative travel allowance of more than $270 a night at a cost to taxpayers of more than $9000 in the first six months of last year alone. The unit, in an architect-designed complex in the Canberra suburb of Forrest, is owned by his wife, Liberty Sanger, through the Liberty Sanger Family Trust, land title documents show.
The Canberra unit, which is across the road from Parliament House, is not specifically listed on his return in the register of interests, although the Liberty Sanger Family Trust is declared.
[...]