on โ02-08-2014 08:45 AM
As a counter point to the endless complaining about the government who was elected by a huge majority to govern and implement their policies which they took to an election I thought a balance of articles would be fair comment.
The sheer hatred for the Abbott is here to see after the left went after his daughter. I hear no squealing about hacking about this hateful concocted plan to destroy a young women to get to her father.
on โ02-08-2014 01:15 PM
@lightningdance wrote:So once hacked then the info is OK to use and slime someone. Is that like the hacking that the news of the world did and is that OK by you as well.
The news of the world has hacked into mobile of kidnapped dead girl, and other mobiles for the sole purpose to collect gossip and private information. Wikileaks on the other hand made public some info obtained by hacking but which is of public interest as being opposite to something that "public finds interesting", but which is none of their business.
Making public the fact that th Abbott girl got scholarship = fact is not exactly sliming anybody.
on โ02-08-2014 01:31 PM
@lightningdance wrote:As this is a diary thread and not subject to rigid topic adherence I will take this opportunity to announce that I will not reply to baiting.
Very wise, Lightning. Remember the old saying. It is far better to say nothing .............. etc. etc.
โ02-08-2014 01:32 PM - edited โ02-08-2014 01:33 PM
@***super_nova*** wrote:
@lightningdance wrote:So once hacked then the info is OK to use and slime someone. Is that like the hacking that the news of the world did and is that OK by you as well.
The news of the world has hacked into mobile of kidnapped dead girl, and other mobiles for the sole purpose to collect gossip and private information. Wikileaks on the other hand made public some info obtained by hacking but which is of public interest as being opposite to something that "public finds interesting", but which is none of their business.
Making public the fact that th Abbott girl got scholarship = fact is not exactly sliming anybody.
The whole raison detre of hacking the information was to slime an innocent young woman and damage her father, the PM of this country. Done by left wingers, plotted by the left and then leaked to a left wing media outlet.
Hoist by your own petard much?
on โ02-08-2014 01:52 PM
Sometimes I despair at the mindless support for Hamas, by the left, seen on many threads. I'm sickened and appalled at the support they are willing to give this terrorist regime.
on โ02-08-2014 04:19 PM
@lightningdance wrote:As this is a diary thread and not subject to rigid topic adherence I will take this opportunity to announce that I will not reply to baiting.
Isn't this whole thread a baiting thread?
I can see no other reason for it.
on โ02-08-2014 04:27 PM - last edited on โ02-08-2014 06:25 PM by li.vish
@lightningdance wrote:
@***super_nova*** wrote:
@lightningdance wrote:
So once hacked then the info is OK to use and slime someone. Is that like the hacking that the news of the world did and is that OK by you as well.
The news of the world has hacked into mobile of kidnapped dead girl, and other mobiles for the sole purpose to collect gossip and private information. Wikileaks on the other hand made public some info obtained by hacking but which is of public interest as being opposite to something that "public finds interesting", but which is none of their business.
Making public the fact that th Abbott girl got scholarship = fact is not exactly sliming anybody.
The whole raison detre of hacking the information was to slime an innocent young woman and damage her father, the PM of this country. Done by left wingers, plotted by the left and then leaked to a left wing media outlet.
Hoist by your own petard much?
And if you are going to start a thread then at least get your facts right.
There was no haking. The information was available to staff at the Whitehouse School. They passed that information on via emails.
There was no plot. There was no suggestion that the the teachers who accessed the information were left leaning.
on โ02-08-2014 05:43 PM
Just another example of how corrupt and manipulative Gillard was. Her manipulation of the election, her minder McTernan using the OPM to assist Latham in his attacks on Rudd to back her up.
It's never ending just how corrupt, and divisive she was and still is.
Thanks Julia, Thanks Latham, Thanks McTernan and thanks to Fairfax for all the assistance they gave to Labor, Latham and Gillard to continue to lie to the public.
on โ02-08-2014 05:49 PM
@i-need-a-martini wrote:
@lightningdance wrote:
@***super_nova*** wrote:
@lightningdance wrote:So once hacked then the info is OK to use and slime someone. Is that like the hacking that the news of the world did and is that OK by you as well.
The news of the world has hacked into mobile of kidnapped dead girl, and other mobiles for the sole purpose to collect gossip and private information. Wikileaks on the other hand made public some info obtained by hacking but which is of public interest as being opposite to something that "public finds interesting", but which is none of their business.
Making public the fact that th Abbott girl got scholarship = fact is not exactly sliming anybody.
The whole raison detre of hacking the information was to slime an innocent young woman and damage her father, the PM of this country. Done by left wingers, plotted by the left and then leaked to a left wing media outlet.
Hoist by your own petard much?
And if you are going to start a thread then at least get your facts right.
There was no haking. The information was available to staff at the Whitehouse School. They passed that information on via emails.
There was no plot. There was no suggestion that the the teachers who accessed the information were left leaning.
You are simply making up rubbish to perpetuate your own agenda.
Wendy Bacon's tweets on Frances Abbott
Mr Abbott has dismissed the suggestion he was required to declare a scholarship for his daughter, and the Whitehouse Institute claims it was awarded on merit.
The computer-hacking incident has since become a criminal investigation that is nearing completion, following a complaint to police from management of the Whitehouse Institute about a major security breach involving the alleged illegal accessing and distribution of confidential student records.
Ahem.......another petard?? There was no haking (sic)
on โ02-08-2014 05:55 PM
Gillard ignored the threat of home grown jihadists and buried the report. Just another example of the catastrophic failure Gillard and Labor was and still is.
The lies and the fear she engendered in politics and her Party is phenomenal and frightening. Lets not even mention Rudd, that's a whole other disaster.
on โ02-08-2014 06:11 PM
@pct001wine wrote:It's a bit difficult to gain an understanding of your links OP when they are hidden behind a paywall. Not all of us can afford - or choose to - pay for our news.
No need to pay for it, pct, here it is again: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/media/revealed-the-plot-to-bring-down-tony-abbotts-daughter-frances/...
"Wendy Bacon, the prominent journalism teacher and contributing editor of New Matilda, has claimed the leaked information โ which also involved a hacker allegedly gaining illegal access to the files of more than 500 other students โ was justified in the public interest."
Ms Bacon, it seems will not shrink from criminal activity to besmirch a young woman's name and indirectly attempt to discredit her father, the PM. Which obviously was the original intent.
Dirty deeds done dirt cheap indeed.