Do you think Bill Shorten will make a good PM?

[donnashuggy]

I can't get excited at the thought and was never really sold on rudd. I'd like to see a woman back there in the near future.

Which elections can you remember being passionate about?

I loved Bob Hawk at the time, then Keating and Gough was a stand out, cannot think of any others apart from really wanting Julia to win when she did.

[poddster]

You haven't changed a bit Donna in all the years that I have known you. You have always thrown the cat among the pidgeons and watched the feathers fly without getting involved to any depth.

In this one post you have named nearly all of the worse Prime Monsters that Australia has ever known and some of them even have a bad reputation internationally.

i eagerly awaity your post naming your version of the best Treasurers and then Foriegn Ministers.

I know that what you say is tongue in cheek but not all the posters here realise that 🙂

[newstart2380]

No

[jodies*new*life]

Could not possibly we any worse than the current one

[newstart2380]

---

@barry1jodie1 wrote:
Could not possibly we any worse than the current one

---

I think he did a reasonable job when he was a union boss but I think he is to involved and to obligated to the unions to be able to have a balanced view.

[icyfroth]

Re: Do you think Bill Shorten will make a good PM?

He seems a nice enough man but he comes across as ineffectual and easily influenced.

[twinkles**stars]

Do you think Bill Shorten will make a good PM?

No

[monman12]

"I can't get excited at the thought and was never really sold on rudd. I'd like to see a woman back there in the near future."

After Poor Me Gillard  the chances of that are somewhat reduced DY.   As for Shorten,  he once  repeatedly claimed to support whatever Gillard had said, even though he didn’t know what she said,  that makes him a very good and (blind) follower, not leadership material. Anyway time will tell, because so far he has been somewhat subdued.

I voted for Rudd because he was not from the ALP head office : the ACTU.

I voted for Poor Me Gillard because she  was a woman  and could not do worse than Rudd, and also I could remember some tough international female leaders.

I was wrong in both cases.

After the Poor Me and Ruddy circus I voted for the devil I know, not  the clown(s).

Time will tell.

[icyfroth]

---

@monman12 wrote:

"I can't get excited at the thought and was never really sold on rudd. I'd like to see a woman back there in the near future."

After Poor Me Gillard  the chances of that are somewhat reduced DY.   As for Shorten,  he once  repeatedly claimed to support whatever Gillard had said, even though he didn’t know what she said,  that makes him a very good and (blind) follower, not leadership material. Anyway time will tell, because so far he has been somewhat subdued.

I voted for Rudd because he was not from the ALP head office : the ACTU.

I voted for Poor Me Gillard because she  was a woman  and could not do worse than Rudd, and also I could remember some tough international female leaders.

I was wrong in both cases.

After the Poor Me and Ruddy circus I voted for the devil I know, not  the clown(s).

Time will tell.

---

same

[topsidesoul]

Yeah I voted for someone who cares for themseleves and has a bad history.

But I am smarter than all you people who voted for clowns!

[topsidesoul]

Never actually seen or heard much from shorten so Cannot answer this question.

If he doesn't flee on foot from reporters you know he has the ticker, unlike some.