on 25-03-2014 02:36 PM
on 25-03-2014 02:42 PM
The 'dis' part is silent.
on 25-03-2014 02:44 PM
yes it irritates me.
on 25-03-2014 02:45 PM
@donnashuggy wrote:It really irritates me, hello monman, is that enough for my daily diss?
and no it isn't enough, more please.
on 25-03-2014 02:50 PM
It will annoy the left flock on here and they can now sit around in this thread and hold hands and go tsk tsk tsk and all talk to each other about how much RESPECT for the status of the office annoys them and show everyone that they themselves have no respect for anyone.
BUT funny it didnt annoy them when it was applied to Rudd/Gillard?Rudd and RESPECT was shown to them
on 25-03-2014 02:52 PM
@boris1gary wrote:
@donnashuggy wrote:It really irritates me, hello monman, is that enough for my daily diss?
and no it isn't enough, more please.
Happy to oblige when I get home from shopping 🙂
on 25-03-2014 03:02 PM
thanks Donna, maybe others could stay on topic though.
It's very, very irritating that such a dishonourable buffoon is referred to as honorable.
on 25-03-2014 03:03 PM
on 25-03-2014 03:21 PM
Does it annoy you when they refer to Tony Abbott as honorable?
Of course not.
For Brutus is an honourable man;
So are they all, all honourable men--
(Julius Ceasar - act 3 scene 2)
on 25-03-2014 03:25 PM
it doesn't bother me. its a title given not earned so it means little.