@the_great_she_elephant wrote:
They exist, it's known they exist, it's known they are secretive, and we know they have procurers like the deceased Jeffery Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell et al. Why NOT drag them into the discussion?
Because, as you yourself pointed out, they are not drag queens, and you provided no evidence to show they are funding LBGTQ programmes in schools.
And there will be no evidence they are funding, or in other ways influencing school boards, I'm sure, at least none that would be made public.
It's highly unlikely they are Drag Queens themselves, but they would be using organisations like Rainbow Families QLD to influence parents and children into thinking sexual deviance is the norm
Why drag your Bible stories into the discussion, for that matter? "OMG! Horrific flashack! I've just remembered all the angelssin those Bible stories I read as a child. How much more camp can you get than a pair of wings and a long white frock?"
Because your argument is that men camping it up in womens clothes is harmful to children. Bible stories are designed to be read by children and How much more camp can you get than a pair of wings and a long white frock?"
And rainbow Families Queensland were not "innocent parties" to the reading - they actually organised it.
Actually, I didn't say,"harmful" to children, I said children were being sexualised.
I can think of much more camp behaviour than a pair of wings and a white frock, believe me.
Did you read in a previous post where I said an Uncle of mine was gay? He made no secret of it, either, and this was way back in the late 1960s to around 1990s, when he died of AIDS. He certainly camped it up, but he never pretended to be a woman.
He was also a "sexualised" child. Although I think he may have had a tendency to homosexuality anyway.
