on 11-03-2016 07:31 PM
GERMANY, Sweden and other European countries are facing growing public unrest amid a wave of reports of sexual assaults since the Cologne attacks.
New York-based conservative think tank Gatestone Institute has compiled a shocking list of sexual assaults and rapes by migrants in Germany in just the first two months of the year.
Drawing only from German media reports, the list documents more than 160 instances of rape and sexual assault committed by migrants in train stations, swimming pools and other public places against victims as young as seven.
German police use terms such as “southerners” (südländer), men with “dark skin” (dunkelhäutig, dunklere gesichtsfarbe, dunklem hauttyp) or “southern skin colour” (südländische hautfarbe) to describe the alleged perpetrators.
Authorities across the country have been accused of downplaying the true extent of the problem by suppressing information about migrant-related crimes, ostensibly due to a “lack of public interest”.
[...]
I wonder what day Europe celebrates 'Harmony Day'?
on 13-03-2016 08:25 PM
@***super_nova*** wrote:
Pity that the facts spoil the fascists' hysterical claims:
An official report says that the influx of refugees in Germany has not led to increased crime rates. It also examined further crime trends among Germany's growing refugee population.
http://www.dw.com/en/report-refugees-have-not-increased-crime-rate-in-germany/a-18848890
The Che memorabilia wearing, monarchy-hating, G*d-hating, compost bin dwelling, faux intellectuals and prisoners of delusional fanaticism always try to paint other as deniers. It is now that group, keen to toss the word denier around, at last find it an apt description of themselves.
It’s not only Germany that covers up mass sex attacks by migrant men... Sweden’s record is shameful
Stockholm police were warned not to give descriptions of the perpetrators lest they were accused of being racist
It took days for police to acknowledge the extent of the mass attacks on women celebrating New Year’s Eve in Cologne. The Germans were lucky; in Sweden, similar attacks have been taking place for more than a year and the authorities are still playing catch up. Only now is the truth emerging, both about the attacks and the cover-ups. Stefan Löfven, our Prime Minister, has denounced a ‘double betrayal’ of women and has promised an investigation. But he ought to be asking this: what made the police and even journalists cover up the truth?
The answer can be discovered in the reaction to the Cologne attacks. Sweden prides itself on its sexual equality and has even pioneered a feminist foreign policy. When hundreds of women were reported to have been molested and abused in Cologne — at the hands of an organised mob — the reaction from Swedish politicians and pundits ought to have been one of outrage.
Instead, we were told that the events in Cologne were not unusual. An article in Aftonbladet, Sweden’s largest tabloid, argued that it was racist to point out that the perpetrators in Cologne had been described as North African or Arab, since German men had carried out sexual assaults during Bavaria’s Oktober-fest. Another Aftonbladet article said that reporting on the Cologne attacks was bowing to right-wing extremism. Over the last week, we have been told over and over that the real issue is men, not any particular culture — that Swedish men are no better.
[...]
on 14-03-2016 06:01 PM
Nobody is covering up anything, people have been charged for theft and sexual assaults, and some have been charged for making false claims. As i said before, when a German men at Octoberfest manhandle women it does not make headlines, when it is somebody from Middle East it does. Sexual assault is NOT acceptable FULL STOP, regardless of the race of the perpetrator or their victim.
I do not suppose you can write a comment without all that florid nonsense ?
on 14-03-2016 07:16 PM
@***super_nova*** wrote:
I do not suppose you can write a comment without all that florid nonsense ?
You don't like my writing infused with florid nonsense? I am merely using the tactic of the left, the hand-wringers, the bed-wetters. The left seem incapable of striping away the emotion when writing on issues so I like to use tripe, nonsense and emotional clap trap when I write.
on 14-03-2016 07:33 PM
Hi everyone, the discussion is getting a little heated. Please be sure to keep your communications civil. Thanks!
14-03-2016 10:26 PM - edited 14-03-2016 10:28 PM
As forecast in my post #4 above, the German regional elections yesterday (Sunday) were a disaster for the German Prime Minister (Chancellor), Angela Merkel:
>> State elections present a defeat for the Chancellor.
The populist right-wing AfD party made the biggest gains in Sunday's state elections, apparently because the electorate felt they were not being taken seriously by the main parties.
>> The results in the three State elections are a reflection of the turbulence that Angela Merkel's open-border refugee policy has caused in German society.
>> While more people took part in the elections than five years ago, many of the voters gave their vote to the right-leaning AfD (Alternative For Germany) party, whose goal is to immediately stop Germany's intake of refugees. This is something that will no doubt annoy the major parties.
>> In the eastern German state of Saxony-Anhalt, the AfD received as much as 24% of the vote. That's more than a right-wing party has ever received in modern Germany.
>> Even in the western German state of Baden-Württemberg, where the economic situation is good and the unemployment level is low, the AfD received around 15%.
>> Here, half the population is reported to be afraid that refugees will make the housing market too competitive, increase crime and lead to too much Islamic influence in Germany.
>> The results are clearly a setback for the Chancellor Merkel, who has been committed to her policy on refugees. In her former heartland of support, Baden-Württemberg, Merkel's Christian Democrat (CDU) party is no longer the strongest force - for the first time since 1952.
>> That things didn't turn out a lot worse is probably thanks to the closure of the so-called Balkan route for the refugees through Austria and southeastern Europe, something which Angela Merkel has heavily criticized.
>> Some 70% of voters say that they are "relieved" that not so many refugees are coming to Germany at the moment. These elections send a clear message to the government in Berlin to stop refugee numbers from growing again.
www.dw.com/en/state-elections-defeat-for-german-chancellor/19114618
www.dw.com/press-review-election-nightmare-for-merkel/19114850
DW (Deutsche Welle) is Germany's International state broadcaster:
http://www.dw.com/en/about-dw/profile/s-30688
on 15-03-2016 02:19 AM
Politicians don't say anything without careful consideration beforehand.
Every single thing they say on the public record has been carefully thought out and planned for in advance.
There's no argument that an influx of people (immigrants) who desperately seek work and the means to make a living, might decide to offer their labour for a little bit less than the going rate.
Look . . . immigrants (especially a really humungeous and unmanageable amount of them) have the capacity to adversely affect the local price of labour.
They are competitors who drive the price of labour down. This is very basic economics.
So, we if have a struggling economy . . . sure, let's just import (or allow to be imported) a really large contingent of folks who need a job. and who are therefore willing to work for less.
Recipe for a healthy economy?
Depends who you are, doesn't it?
if you're a business owner, then employing cheaper labour is a bonus.
if you are a working person, then competing with someone who will work for less is a real trial.
We vote for people who would bring into the country whole boatloads of displaced people who have been made homeless in the first place by our own country's policies.
We vote for a govt who goes all out to create for itself a source of cheap labour at our expense.
Our own government's policies are and have been responsible for creating the current epidemic of refugees which are now threatening to flood our shores.
and then our govt has the gall to ask us to accept them with sympathy . . . a sympathy which it did not show when it bombed their countries and displaced their people and caused them to queue up and stand in line for jobs in foreign lands. . . our lands, as it happens.
doesn't matter if it's Liberal or Labor . . . the result will be the same. Cause mischief in other countries; facilitate the free movement of peoples who will work for less and will have a reduced national attatchment to the country they move to.
It's a chess game played on a grand scale.
Politicians don't care about us at all. They care about how they can manipulate us to vote.
It's a fine balancing act. The pollies want to bring in as much cheap labour as they can without making the natives restless.
and even if the natives get so restless that they boot out the self-serving politicians and elect new ones in their place; what do you think we'll get?
Just look at what they do . . . don't be hoodwinked and fooled and misled by only listening to what they say.
Vote Labor or vote Liberal? . . . when faced with two wholly distasteful alternatives it's not compulsory to make a choice. . . . Just say No. Refuse to vote for either of them.
on 15-03-2016 02:38 AM
Let's just say we have a govt which wants to reduce the wages cost of labour.
Let's say we have a govt which wants to tighten the grip it holds on the metaphorical collars of its' people.
We import cheap labour in the form of immigrants while at the same time saying "oh my! but they're foreigners" and untrustworthy of acting in a civilised manner . . . . so . . . we need to introduce new laws which will "protect" our people.
and if the new laws restrict the rights and freedoms of the native population? we're sure they'll understand that we're only acting in their best interests . . . . and what's more . . . we're sure they are too stupid to see through our little scam and that no matter what, they will continue to vote for us . . . doesn't matter which one of us is voted in . . . the result will be the same.
Look at what they do. remember what they said?
on 15-03-2016 08:39 AM
hhhhhhhhhhh
Politicians don't say anything without careful consideration beforehand.
Every single thing they say on the public record has been carefully thought out and planned for in advance.
You can't have been listening during the Abbott term.
16-03-2016 02:41 AM - edited 16-03-2016 02:43 AM
Yes, people in Europe are terrified; they have been told for years to be terrified by the right wing racist parties. The interesting thing is that the most hysterical reaction to the refugees is in those countries that actually do not have many of them coming in, and those who enter are only passing through, and do not want to stay there.
The fact is that one million plus people coming into Europe should not be a problem. If you take into consideration that EU population was 508.2 million at 1 January 2015, another 1 million, which is only 0.2% will not make much of a difference. Actually, considering that many European countries have very low birth rate, bringing in young strong workers is going to be extremely beneficial to them. If the do not, they will find themselves in the situation that Japan is in now with large % of population being old retired people. The refugees will not take jobs away from Europeans, they will do all those jobs that Europeans do not want to do, or they will fill positions that there is a shortage of local skilled workers.
on 16-03-2016 09:55 AM
The refugees will not take jobs away from Europeans, they will do all those jobs that Europeans do not want to do, or they will fill positions that there is a shortage of local skilled workers.
Sounds good in theory but I doubt that is the case, it is already happening in Australia. So many migrants are working for less than the minimum wage, illegally, that takes jobs away from everyday Australians. Globalization does not always work, look at the United States.