on โ09-10-2014 11:03 AM
<script src="http://beacon.krxd.net/optout_check?callback=Krux.ns._default.kxjsonp_optOutCheck" type="mce-text/javascript"></script>
Hizb ut-Tahrir refuses to criticise Muslim terrorists who slaughter other Muslims, massacre infidels, traffic in women and behead journalists and aid workers:
Emma Alberici confronts this head case.
The interview is quite revealing. Apparently its all our fault again. In typical fashion its all about our countrys desire to assist the barbarians out of ...the stone age.
Its ok for IS to butcher their own kind but its not ok for us to stand in the middle of the religious factions to seek peace between the warring tribes.
The quicker these fruit loops are chucked out of Australia the better.
Poor Emma Alberici couldnt get a word in with this hate filled person... and he was born here and lives in our society yet hates us and everything we stand for
Take 10 minutes and watch this interview from Lateline last night... its an eye opener...
Australian Broadcasting Corporation
Broadcast: 08/10/2014
Reporter: Emma Alberici
http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2014/s4103227.htm
Solved! Go to Solution.
on โ10-10-2014 11:50 AM
@secondhand-wonderland wrote:
@*julia*2010 wrote:have you seen any of his other
interviews with different journos
on different programs?
No Julia I havent. I actually watch very little TV tbh. This video posted by Nero was the first time I have ever seen him. I'm open to watching more of his interviews though if you can be bothered posting some links.
ok. the reason why i asked that is
because that is the way he seems
to conduct himself. to re-direct the topic
where he thinks it needs to be.
EMMA ALBERICI: Can do me a favour? But will you do me a favour and ask - answer one question?
WASSIM DOUREIHI: I'm doing the public - I'm doing the public a great favour by refocusing this discussion where it needs to be.
i can only find transcripts from the old
lateline interviews but will try to find some
videos. he was on other current affairs shows
as well.
on โ10-10-2014 11:54 AM
@karliandjacko wrote:
@nero_wulf wrote:So are you a supporter of Hizb ut Tahrir and an Islamic state?
Are you supporting or are you a supporter of sharia law and sharia law in Australia?
Do you want Australia to be converted to an Islamic state under sharia law?
Those are hideous questions, or is demands more apt.
People discussing issues is not an invitation for a hysterical shout down.
The post quoted could be described as borderline bullying.
They were polite general questions to no one in particular and not directed to anyone in particular and in line with the topic, 1 person answered, well didnt answer but their lack on any answers and defence was enough to form an opinion... They are OPEN questions....
There is no... as you have described it : hysterical shout down...... just polite general questions to all and anyone...
So as put it who am I borderline bullying.... please do tell as my questions are polite and are open for anyone to reply
Would you like to answer the general polite questions that I posted to no one in particular but are open to anyone to answer?
on โ10-10-2014 12:04 PM
@*julia*2010 wrote:
@secondhand-wonderland wrote:
@*julia*2010 wrote:have you seen any of his other
interviews with different journos
on different programs?
No Julia I havent. I actually watch very little TV tbh. This video posted by Nero was the first time I have ever seen him. I'm open to watching more of his interviews though if you can be bothered posting some links.
ok. the reason why i asked that is
because that is the way he seems
to conduct himself. to re-direct the topic
where he thinks it needs to be.
EMMA ALBERICI: Can do me a favour? But will you do me a favour and ask - answer one question?
WASSIM DOUREIHI: I'm doing the public - I'm doing the public a great favour by refocusing this discussion where it needs to be.
i can only find transcripts from the old
lateline interviews but will try to find some
videos. he was on other current affairs shows
as well.
Okay so he didn't answer the question with a simple yes or no answer. Why should anyone have to answer a loaded, complicated question like that with a simple yes or no. He was trying to explain to Emma his position on the topic/question posed and she just kept shutting him down and expecting him to answer with either yes or no. IMO he deserved the right to express his opinion. It's like me asking you something like (now I dont expect an answer from you persaonally I'm just posing a hypothetical) Do you agree with abortion, yes or no? And you try to explain to me that in some cases you do and in other cases you dont, but I just keep speaking over the top of you and demanding a yes or no answer, it's just not a fair way to conduct myself after asking you for your opinion on such a contentious, complicated topic. jmo of course...
โ10-10-2014 12:08 PM - edited โ10-10-2014 12:09 PM
@boris1gary wrote:
@nero_wulf wrote:
@boris1gary wrote:
@nero_wulf wrote:So are you a supporter of Hizb ut Tahrir and an Islamic state?
Are you supporting or are you a supporter of sharia law and sharia law in Australia?
Do you want Australia to be converted to an Islamic state under sharia law?
don't waste time asking me stupid questions, this isn't the bolt show.
They are fair and reasonable questions based on your never ending support for Islam and terrorist and your never ending attacks and criticism of the Australian govt and the Australian way of life.... and thats all they are, fair questions to garner answers in line with the topic of this thread...
so based on your inability to answer them I am taking the answers as all being YES to all my questions.
and yet your demands were posted to me and your above response was to me or are you accusing others of supporting terrorists or just me?
My questions were never posted to you, I just clicked on REPLY to the post above and if that was from you it doesnt mean I was asking you directly
They are general questions in line with the topic
You appear to have taken it that I was asking you and you went into defensive mode and I simply replied to your reply (and attack) and lack of any answers...
So these are general questions.... would you like to answer them as to where you stand and what you support as this will help us all in framing our replies to this thread and topic...
๐
on โ10-10-2014 12:15 PM
i can see where you're coming from and
the abortion imo is a very good example
because to some people it would not be
a clear yes or no. it could be yes and no -
depending on the situation for example.
so - he could have said - no i do not agree
with the barbaric tactics of isil but let me explain
the bigger picture. instead, he wanted to tell
her in private.
as i said before - i wasn't surprised at all by
his responses and i feel the interview was a
waste of time.
โ10-10-2014 12:15 PM - edited โ10-10-2014 12:17 PM
@karliandjacko wrote:
@nero_wulf wrote:
@karliandjacko wrote:
@nero_wulf wrote:So are you a supporter of Hizb ut Tahrir and an Islamic state?
Are you supporting or are you a supporter of sharia law and sharia law in Australia?
Do you want Australia to be converted to an Islamic state under sharia law?
Those are hideous questions, or is demands more apt.
People discussing issues is not an invitation for a hysterical shout down.
The post quoted could be described as borderline bullying.
They were polite general questions to no one in particular and not directed to anyone in particular and in line with the topic, 1 person answered, well didnt answer but their lack on any answers and defence was enough to form an opinion... They are OPEN questions....
There is no... as you have described it : hysterical shout down...... just polite general questions to all and anyone...
So as put it who am I borderline bullying.... please do tell as my questions are polite and are open for anyone to reply
Would you like to answer the general polite questions that I posted to no one in particular but are open to anyone to answer?
They don't come across as polite questions. They are large bolded fonts
They are not BOLDED... this is BOLDED
which appear aggressive
No aggression at all and never intended
in a conversation of normal sized fonts. The qustions are extreme demands which imply that those who don't agree with one view are in support of extremists.
They are questions, noting else, you are doing all you can to read something into simple questions..... either answer them or dont..
Why ask if people want sharia law in Australia when most people don't understand what sharia law is and means, including those who cry for the banishment of it?
So why dont you explain sharia law to all us ill-informed infidels and what it means and what it would mean to Australia and our way of life.. PLEASE
Sorry the above is in large bold font as I would really love for you to explain it so we are all informed.... ๐
on โ10-10-2014 12:17 PM
They are large bolded fonts which appear aggressive in a conversation of normal sized fonts.
i have to remember that lol
โ10-10-2014 12:19 PM - edited โ10-10-2014 12:22 PM
@*julia*2010 wrote:They are large bolded fonts which appear aggressive in a conversation of normal sized fonts.
i have to remember that lol
Yep I have noted that as well and may quote the poster at a later date ๐
on โ10-10-2014 12:21 PM
So are you a supporter of Hizb ut Tahrir and an Islamic state?
Are you supporting or are you a supporter of sharia law and sharia law in Australia?
Do you want Australia to be converted to an Islamic state under sharia law?
I'll answer the questions ...
No
No
No
Now, what's the question behind the questions?
on โ10-10-2014 12:22 PM