on โ09-10-2014 11:03 AM
<script src="http://beacon.krxd.net/optout_check?callback=Krux.ns._default.kxjsonp_optOutCheck" type="mce-text/javascript"></script>
Hizb ut-Tahrir refuses to criticise Muslim terrorists who slaughter other Muslims, massacre infidels, traffic in women and behead journalists and aid workers:
Emma Alberici confronts this head case.
The interview is quite revealing. Apparently its all our fault again. In typical fashion its all about our countrys desire to assist the barbarians out of ...the stone age.
Its ok for IS to butcher their own kind but its not ok for us to stand in the middle of the religious factions to seek peace between the warring tribes.
The quicker these fruit loops are chucked out of Australia the better.
Poor Emma Alberici couldnt get a word in with this hate filled person... and he was born here and lives in our society yet hates us and everything we stand for
Take 10 minutes and watch this interview from Lateline last night... its an eye opener...
Australian Broadcasting Corporation
Broadcast: 08/10/2014
Reporter: Emma Alberici
http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2014/s4103227.htm
Solved! Go to Solution.
โ10-10-2014 03:55 PM - edited โ10-10-2014 03:56 PM
โ10-10-2014 04:16 PM - edited โ10-10-2014 04:18 PM
@secondhand-wonderland wrote:
@ufo_investigations wrote:
@nero_wulf wrote:So are you a supporter of Hizb ut Tahrir and an Islamic state?
Are you supporting or are you a supporter of sharia law and sharia law in Australia?
Do you want Australia to be converted to an Islamic state under sharia law?
__________________________________________________________________________
I'll have a go at answering your questions Nero.
I dont know much about Hizb ut Tahrir so I cant really answer that question BUT I am for an Islamic state in the middle east. As far as I'm concerned if the Jewish people can have a Jewish state in the middle east then so should the Muslims be able to have an Islamic state in the middle east.
I am a supporter of Sharia law in an Islamic state in the middle east, but am totally against Sharia law in Australia.
Absolutely no way.
I think all countries should have secular laws of the state and sharia law should be applied only in the homes of those who wish to adhere to them. Much like Catholic laws are to Australian catholics and Jehovah's Witnesses apply their religious laws to their lives.
There seems to be differing interpretations of Sharia law as there are differing interpretations of Christian laws/rules.
There are already Muslim states in the ME and there are many causes of conflict within the same overall religion with the various understandings and interpretations.
on โ10-10-2014 04:20 PM
Most Muslims have accepted compromise in practice as long as they are not required to do anything against their understanding of Godโs requirements. They are accustomed to obeying the law of the land as well as the sharia, since obedience to legitimate authority is itself a sharia requirement.
Judaism is also a religion of law but no hysterical babbling about that.
on โ10-10-2014 04:23 PM
@kilroy_is_here wrote:
So you are happy to support the setting up of state that includes the for forceable take over of every independent nation in the Middle East including Turkey where that state is headed by 1 man elected by only Muslims regardless of how many non Muslims live within that zone where if a person decides he doesn't want to practice the Muslim faith and try's to leave can be lawfully killed, where e rights of individuals is suspended or only honoured where it is sanctioned by a document over 1000 years old, where the the inflation of Jews is one of the 4 pillars of this state
That's not what the poster said.
One of the problems with this type of discussion is the impression people must have of sharia law without really understanding what it is. As soon as muslim and sharia is mentioned people go on the attack in the belief that sharia is about taking over the country.
on โ10-10-2014 04:49 PM
@boris1gary wrote:Most Muslims have accepted compromise in practice as long as they are not required to do anything against their understanding of Godโs requirements. They are accustomed to obeying the law of the land as well as the sharia, since obedience to legitimate authority is itself a sharia requirement.
Judaism is also a religion of law but no hysterical babbling about that.
yeah but we're talking about caliphate
according to the HT not a parliamentary republic.
on โ10-10-2014 04:54 PM
@karliandjacko wrote:
@kilroy_is_here wrote:
So you are happy to support the setting up of state that includes the for forceable take over of every independent nation in the Middle East including Turkey where that state is headed by 1 man elected by only Muslims regardless of how many non Muslims live within that zone where if a person decides he doesn't want to practice the Muslim faith and try's to leave can be lawfully killed, where e rights of individuals is suspended or only honoured where it is sanctioned by a document over 1000 years old, where the the inflation of Jews is one of the 4 pillars of this stateThat's not what the poster said.
One of the problems with this type of discussion is the impression people must have of sharia law without really understanding what it is. As soon as muslim and sharia is mentioned people go on the attack in the belief that sharia is about taking over the country.
From my post #66... Why dont you explain sharia law to us...
Why ask if people want sharia law in Australia when most people don't understand what sharia law is and means, including those who cry for the banishment of it?
So why dont you explain sharia law to all us ill-informed infidels and what it means and what it would mean to Australia and our way of life.. PLEASE
--------------------------------------
Make sure you include the total oppression of women in your explanation....
If you like so you have a platform I can start a topic for you and you can then have the floor for a full explanation as us infidels dont understand it at all it seems.
Would you like me to start the topic?
๐
on โ10-10-2014 05:04 PM
this is an interesting read:
I thank Allah (tt) that i now have the oppoturnity to express why i oppose Hizb-ut-Tahrir.
The Caliphate according to the HT
http://www.islamawareness.net/Deviant/Hizb/hizb_article003.html
on โ10-10-2014 05:05 PM - last edited on โ11-10-2014 12:11 PM by gewens
I'm going to spend 10 minutes reading about Judaism on wikipedia then I will be an expert on all things pertaining to Judaism.
on โ10-10-2014 05:05 PM
on โ10-10-2014 05:07 PM
@nero_wulf wrote:
@karliandjacko wrote:
@kilroy_is_here wrote:
So you are happy to support the setting up of state that includes the for forceable take over of every independent nation in the Middle East including Turkey where that state is headed by 1 man elected by only Muslims regardless of how many non Muslims live within that zone where if a person decides he doesn't want to practice the Muslim faith and try's to leave can be lawfully killed, where e rights of individuals is suspended or only honoured where it is sanctioned by a document over 1000 years old, where the the inflation of Jews is one of the 4 pillars of this stateThat's not what the poster said.
One of the problems with this type of discussion is the impression people must have of sharia law without really understanding what it is. As soon as muslim and sharia is mentioned people go on the attack in the belief that sharia is about taking over the country.
From my post #66... Why dont you explain sharia law to us...
Why ask if people want sharia law in Australia when most people don't understand what sharia law is and means, including those who cry for the banishment of it?
So why dont you explain sharia law to all us ill-informed infidels and what it means and what it would mean to Australia and our way of life.. PLEASE
--------------------------------------
Make sure you include the total oppression of women in your explanation....
If you like so you have a platform I can start a topic for you and you can then have the floor for a full explanation as us infidels dont understand it at all it seems.
Would you like me to start the topic?
๐
Did I say I'm an expert in Sharia Law?
No, I did not. So please stop with the hounding.