Extremists declare war on Italy

[ufo_investigations]

The religion of peace has made a threat to Italy.

Here it is:

"O Europeans, the Islamic State did not initiate a war against you, as your governments and media try to make you believe. It is you who started the transgression against us, and thus you deserve blame and you will pay a great price.

"You will pay the price as you are afraid of travelling to any land. Rather you will pay the price as you walk on your streets, turning right and left, fearing the Muslims. You will not feel secure even in your bedrooms.

"We will strike you in your homeland, and you will never be able to harm anyone afterwards.

"We have warned you that today we are in a new era, an era where the [Islamic] State, its soldiers, and its sons are leaders not slaves. They are a people who through the ages have not known defeat. The outcome of their battles is concluded before they begin. Being killed—according to their account—is a victory.

"This is where the secret lies. You fight a people who can never be defeated. They either gain victory or are killed.

"We will conquer your Rome, break your crosses, and enslave your women, by the permission of Allah."

http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/5240/islam-in-europe-january

[myoclon1cjerk]

Iraq & Vietnam

[myoclon1cjerk]

That goes for Bush,Blair,LBJ,Nixon and Kennedy too.Just to show my impartiality i.e Labour (U.K) and Democrat/Republican (U.S.)

[vicr3000]

Never seen any war crime convictions for either. And their is not a court that is worth a pinch of salt that would convict either of them.

Just because you don't believe in the politics of any of them and what went on does NOT make them war criminals.

if that is the case, then Rudd and Gillard are murderers for allowing Asylum Seekers to drown knowing full well

they could and they also could have stopped it.

[myoclon1cjerk]

They didn't drop bombs on asylum seekers.Sorry your argument doesn't hold water.Illegal invasion of those two countries = war crimes in my book.Lots of killers have never been convicted.That doesn't make them innocent.

[myoclon1cjerk]

There is not a court that would convict them because they haven't got the cojones.

[vicr3000]

In your book ?

I am afraid you are not the determiner of war crimes or international law and whether someone is a war criminal.

Do you rant about people like Saddam and others who also do far worse, like they did to Kuwait and it's people ?

I somehow doubt it.

"There is not a court that would convict them because they haven't got the cojones."

The US doesn't recognise the court and neither should we (as in Australia).

We should never have signed up to it.

[vicr3000]

The US doesn't recognise the court and neither should we (as in Australia).

[vicr3000]

We should never have signed up to it.

[myoclon1cjerk]

Of course the U.S. doesn't recognise it otherwise most of their political leaders would have been arrested.
So if Saddam is a criminal (which he is) for the wholesale slaughter of people,Bush Blair & co aren't.A bit one eyed don't you think?

[vicr3000]

Saddam didn't wholesale slaughter people in Kuwait.

The US wholesale slaughter any in either GW1 or 2.

"Of course the U.S. doesn't recognise it otherwise most of their political leaders would have been arrested."

I'd like to see them try to arrest any US citizen. They would get short shifted very quickly.

And if it did occur, the US would just go and get them back and they couldn't do a damn thing about it.

The US doesn't recognise it because it doesn't need some jumped upstart lefties telling it what to do.

Same reason they take little notice of the UN. Do gooders trying to tell everyone what to do.

[myoclon1cjerk]

O.K So they should just release guys like Milosevic eh?

" The US wholesale slaughter any in either GW1 or 2."
Surely you're joking ...or blind.

[myoclon1cjerk]

Do gooders eh? Isn't that what the US was when they invaded Iraq and Vietnam?