on 01-07-2020 03:21 PM
on 19-07-2020 04:08 PM
@4channel wrote:
@rogespeed wrote:Was health benign fibre-optic terrestrial NBN rollout and promotion stymied by globally enthusiastic wifi 5G ?
It probably was. What Labour proposed was good. Terrestrial NBN via the cable only had one danger for users. The inactivity related to sitting in one position while enjoying good quality connection could lead to heart disease and diabetes etc..
if the roll-out was done properly, none of the fools today would be wanting 5G. By the time they learn that their health has been reversibly damaged it will be too late.
I saw a documentary once called The World According to Monsanto and I was so saddened. There was a section called "Toxic Town" and it was about the residents of a town in the US called Anniston which is in Alabama. These were hard working people who had the misfortune of having their town chosen to have a Monsanto plant operating from. People died and had their health wrecked and there was no come back from that. It was too late. And yet it was allowed to proceed because the law allowed it. I feel quite deep sadness and anger when I think of these people. These everyday / ordinary folks, many African American and Caucasian American folks who were trying to make a living and raise their kids. What did they do to deserve this destruction put on them? Their lives ruined for what??
Toxic Town" 10 Aug, 2003
2,280 views•Oct 15, 201711 subscribers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B1Xbu8kVncQ
The solution to stopping any new proposed maunufacturing process plant or technology that is possibly dangerous is for the agreement that all involved executives and management people and families reside nearby.... re 5G main towers are built in their backyards
on 19-07-2020 10:11 PM
@rogespeed wrote:
The solution to stopping any new proposed maunufacturing process plant or technology that is possibly dangerous is for the agreement that all involved executives and management people and families reside nearby.... re 5G main towers are built in their backyards
Great idea rogespeed. If they want to peddle something then they should be made to wear it.
About 5G, if that were the case, many of these greedy executives would changing industries and getting jobs with companies rolling out fibre optiic.
on 25-07-2020 08:51 AM
on 25-07-2020 11:12 AM
@jetho1680 wrote:https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/Scientist-5G-appeal-2017.pdf
Thanks for the info. There you go, there are stil scientists out there that take pride in having integrity.,
on 26-07-2020 10:56 AM
@4channel wrote:
@jetho1680 wrote:https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/Scientist-5G-appeal-2017.pdf
Thanks for the info. There you go, there are stil scientists out there that take pride in having integrity.,
I was sent the link after I was speaking with a work associate about 5G.
Some interesting reading in both the document and some of the links within it.
on 26-07-2020 11:31 PM
I'll cvhecck out the links as well when I have some time. Are there any other people in your workplace concerned and aware of what is taking place? I know some people who know they will get affected by 5G but have basically accepted defeat and just have given up on talking about it.
27-07-2020 02:20 PM - edited 27-07-2020 02:23 PM
@4channel wrote:I'll cvhecck out the links as well when I have some time. Are there any other people in your workplace concerned and aware of what is taking place? I know some people who know they will get affected by 5G but have basically accepted defeat and just have given up on talking about it.
There are a number of people within my work place who believe there has not been enough research to prove or disprove how safe or unsafe it is.
I would not say they have accepted defeat but are cautious it what they say when speaking about 5g.
I am a health care worker and work with a wide range of people, some highly trained. 5g is a topic that has come up between myself and others that I am close to, some privately stating they are concerned about long term health effects, and admit to being wary of discussing it as others are very quick to label you a conspiracy theorist or part of the tinfoil hat brigade as you are aware.
Speaking publicly, expressing or raising concerns is not always in ones best interest especially if you are held in high regard within your profession.
The people who have concerns have said, again privately, that until fully independent studies have been conducted by professional persons who have no associations with Telcos, manufacturers or with vested interests, including governments, it would be advisable to on the side of caution.
My preference is caution as opposed to recklessness.
30-07-2020 02:27 PM - edited 30-07-2020 02:28 PM
Well said Jetho! And it is sad that some folks self censor because they are afraid of what others will say. And someone calling another a "Tin foil hat job" is the mark of arrogance and cowardice IMO. We see it on-line too often where Keyboard Cowards & Bullies will try and belittle another for their belief (Or refusal to accept the mainstream view) and they work in a team. Quite often their negative rection is masking their own actual cowardice. This is because they have been confronted with belief changing info and their arrogant reaction is the barometer of their own fear!
And so right, we need studies by people that are in no way connected with the industry they are studying.
on 31-07-2020 07:16 PM
4Corners on ABC discusses this topic 3rd August 8:30pm and other times
on 31-07-2020 11:05 PM