on 23-06-2014 11:48 AM
OOHhhhh my poor Timmy
Former first bloke Tim Mathieson urged to explain himself over ‘bang’ phone rant
Listen to his RANT here http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/former-first-bloke-tim-mathieson-urged-to-explain-himself-...
VICTORIA’S Attorney-General Robert Clark has called on Tim Mathieson to explain himself after the former First Bloke left an angry message on Victorian Premier Denis Napthine’s electorate office phone.
Mr Mathieson, the partner of former Prime Minister Julia Gillard, is understood to have left the message on June 11 after he was mentioned in Victorian Parliament during a debate about the now suspended MP Geoff Shaw.
Part of the message said: “So, if he mentions the prime minister’s partner one more time, one more time, there will be a legal action against Denis the vet.
“You hear me? One more time against the ex-Prime Minister’s partner there will be a lawsuit against him so long — I am not, I am not, anything to do with Geoff Shaw, in any way shape or form. So, if he mentions me one more time, I am telling you right now. OK? That’s it. Bang!”
Mr Clark said that if Mr Mathieson did leave the message he must explain himself.
“Debates in the Parliament are free ranging and people are fully entitled to put the point of view and the materials before the house that they wish to,” Mr Clark said.
“If this phone message was left by Mr Mathieson, he needs to explain himself.”
Reports of the message circulated in Canberra last week, with Liberal staffers shocked that Mr Mathieson would threaten to sue the Premier.
Three years ago, Ms Gillard wrote a personal cheque for $4243 to repay the entitlements after Mr Mathieson used the Prime Minister’s taxpayer-funded car to sell shampoo and hair products.
On June 11, the same day that Mr Mathieson left the message, Dr Napthine had referred to the incident in Victorian Parliament.
on 23-06-2014 07:21 PM
ahhh the herald sun, isn't that the lickspittle bolters home, the "article" in the op has about as much credence as the "article" from that other rag the arstrayan that was just caught out lying about the plain packaging of ciggies, well well well, seems that uncle rupes little cheer squad are getting a little desperate now. Wonder what's next?
on 23-06-2014 07:26 PM
@azureline** wrote:for Icy
bang 1 (b
ng)
n.1. A sudden loud noise, as of an explosion.2. A sudden loud blow or bump.3. Informal A sudden burst of action: The campaign started off with a bang.4. Slang A sense of excitement; a thrill: We got a bang out of watching the old movies.v. banged, bang·ing, bangsv.tr.1. To strike heavily and often repeatedly; bump.2. To close suddenly and loudly; slam.3. To handle noisily or violently: banged the pots in the kitchen.4. Vulgar Slang To have sexual intercourse with.v.intr.1. To make a sudden loud, explosive noise.2. To crash noisily against or into something: My elbow banged against the door.adv.1. Exactly; precisely: The arrow hit bang on the target.2. Suddenly; abruptly: cut the conversation bang off.
Ok well there's quite a few options there for Tim to "explain himself" with, isn't there, Az
on 23-06-2014 07:29 PM
Is Tim really worth all this kerfuffle?
on 23-06-2014 07:36 PM
23-06-2014 07:52 PM - edited 23-06-2014 07:53 PM
A newspaper is a newspaper.
Constantly denigrating one that only prints what you want to hear makes it a newsletter, and you perhaps more than obsessive.
Or is a fact only a fact if you agree with it?
on 23-06-2014 08:01 PM
Everyone knows The Daily Telegraph and the Herald Sun are rubbish newspapers.
The Daily Telegraph have to give their newspapers away for FREE to try and get people to read them... in fast food joints, hairdressers etc.
They thrive on sensational 'click bait' headlines and stories full of fluff and very litle if any substance to them.
on 23-06-2014 08:05 PM
@am*3 wrote:Everyone knows The Daily Telegraph and the Herald Sun are rubbish newspapers.
The Daily Telegraph have to give their newspapers away for FREE to try and get people to read them... in fast food joints, hairdressers etc.
They thrive on sensational 'click bait' headlines and stories full of fluff and very litle if any substance to them.
Why are they rubbish? Is that because you don't like what they print? And I believe that fast food "joints" have a range of newspapers for their patrons, are they all rubbish too? Or only the one's you don't like?
23-06-2014 08:08 PM - edited 23-06-2014 08:09 PM
Fast food joints, hairdressers etc ONLY have the Daily Telegraph ( and probaby Sunday one as well, don't know never go there on Sundays) where I live.
Donated FREE by the publisher. What avg cost hairdresser is going to BUY 2 or 3 different newspapers for their customers to browse while waiting.
23-06-2014 08:12 PM - edited 23-06-2014 08:12 PM
Most hairdressers aren't open on Sundays.
Blast! Lead balloon.
on 23-06-2014 08:13 PM
And btw, hairdressers I've been to have magazines, not newspapers.