on 31-12-2013 01:52 AM
Why wont the government mandate into law GPS anti-speeding devices for all vehicles?
Vehicles with such a device would not be able to speed. It would not allow the driver to exceed the speed limit.
ROAD SAFETY CAMERAS would not need to photograph cars and the speed camera office would not need to process speeding infringements.
Police could then concentrate on thefts, fraud, violence etc...
More criminals could be locked up as more effort is put into this.
Instead put CCTV on every major road and install a quadrillion gig HDD which could be accessed by police.
What do you think? Could this work?
on 31-12-2013 02:05 AM
no speeding = lost revenue
31-12-2013 02:18 AM - edited 31-12-2013 02:19 AM
What Kelso said.
The govt depends upon us speeding as an essential part of its' revenue.
Allow cars on the road which can reach 200 km per hour and then fine us for using them.
If the govt really wanted to do something to make the roads safer then it would introduce a law which said that all newly manufacured cars must have a mobile phone blocker installed, so that peeps can't phone or text while driving.
Oh, but sales would plummet. Anyone for an anthrax ripple?
on 31-12-2013 02:24 AM
on 31-12-2013 02:32 AM
All of these things are a technological possibility, but because commercial interests are involved, they remain a practical improbability.
on 31-12-2013 02:37 AM
on 31-12-2013 02:42 AM
on 31-12-2013 02:50 AM
It's also dangerous to have drivers who exceed the speed limit or drivers who phone or text whilst driving.
Are these drivers in full control?
31-12-2013 02:51 AM - edited 31-12-2013 02:52 AM
on 31-12-2013 02:51 AM
Confess now, Crystal . . . you're a speeding text-phone freak, aren't you? 😉