on โ27-01-2014 03:00 PM
Have just been listening to an interview on ABC 24 and she called Juliar Gillard an organ grinders monkey the way she dressed. Here was this wrinkled stick with a head of hair that looked like she had put her hand in the power socket critisizing how another person looked. I personally have never admired this loud, overbearing feminist.
on โ29-01-2014 05:50 AM
@the_great_she_elephant wrote:What does it even mean "femininity intact"?
I'm hoping we are going to be enlightened, Freaki - but I suspect we'll wait in vain.
They shriek, biut they do not answer when challenged. Too cowardly.
Femininity intact is the gift you keep for your husband, but he, of course, doesn't have to reciprocate.
on โ29-01-2014 07:46 AM
@darksideofthemoon wrote:Australia's first female Prime Minister by default freakiness, we didn't get to vote her in.
Not acceptable from my point of view
We did.
The first thing she did was call an election.
on โ29-01-2014 07:50 AM
Hate to shatter your illusion dark, we don't actually vote for a PM - unless of course you happen to live in the PM's area.
on โ29-01-2014 07:51 AM
@polksaladallie wrote:
@the_great_she_elephant wrote:What does it even mean "femininity intact"?
I'm hoping we are going to be enlightened, Freaki - but I suspect we'll wait in vain.They shriek, biut they do not answer when challenged. Too cowardly.
Femininity intact is the gift you keep for your husband, but he, of course, doesn't have to reciprocate.
Clueless prejudices well and truly shining through
on โ29-01-2014 08:55 AM
One good thing to come out of this thread, it is refreshing to see some of our Tone fan club defending Ms Gillard so articulately.
on โ29-01-2014 10:15 AM
@amber-eyed-girl wrote:Educated, intellectual women, who believed in equality of the sexes, have been around a long time.
bluestockings go back to the 1700s and were from all walks of life.
and weak little men who fear loss of the upperhand should women ever get things like the same pay as them for doing the same job have been around forever.
..just like the dipsy women who worried more about men possibly not opening doors for them if they received that 'equal pay'
When it's all said and done a women is a women ....regardless of how she presents herself (ie in a suit and tie) or who her partner of choice is .Only idiots and power trippers fail to comprehend that.
on โ29-01-2014 10:35 AM
Crikey*Mate wrote:The divorce rate has increased significantly since the advent of the no fault divorce in 1974.
is that correct or not ?
Trends in divorce
Figure 6 depicts the number of divorces since 1901 and the corresponding crude divorce rate (i.e., the number of divorces granted in a year per 1,000 residents).
Figure 6: Number of divorces and crude divorce rate, 1901-2011
Note: Crude divorce rate is the number of divorces per 1,000 of the resident population in a given year.
Source: ABS. (various years). Marriages and divorces Australia
.http://www.aifs.gov.au/institute/pubs/factssheets/2013/familytrends/aft3/index.html
on โ29-01-2014 01:17 PM
did you look at the pretty picture?
on โ29-01-2014 01:48 PM
@polksaladallie wrote:
@icyfroth wrote:
@polksaladallie wrote:There seem to be some here who know very little about her. I'd suggest they read some or all of her books.
https://www.google.com.au/#q=germaine+greer+books+list&revid=1476676623
God who'd be interested enough?
Anyone who is fond of good literature, the plight of Australian aborigines, art, the human psyche, genealogy, menopause and how the world's women deal with it, women's whole life, etc.
Well, that leaves me out as I am not interested in any of the above, I have other interests more exciting and before someone asks what they are " no one elses business" (that a very polite way of saying it )
on โ29-01-2014 02:20 PM
@crikey*mate wrote:did you look at the pretty picture?
yes ...
is your statement re divorces since 1974 correct ?