Gillards Tears Too Late For Those Who Cared

[silverfaun]

Here we have a story of just how hypocritical Miss Gillard really is, so like her implacable resistance to climate change & the Pensioner payment rise.

This woman has no core values, no heart & no real caring for any of the polcies put to her regarding NDIS or any other social policy.

All she cares about is "what's in it for ME?" uses her gender & phoney tears to convince the public of her feelings in the marketplace of morality.

This type of politics is sickening to watch,  but even more worrying is what her collegues think, to allow this type of politic to go out there without a wimper of truth in it.

No wonder they will be slung out come Sept, o wonder the majority of voters see her for what she is, no wonder we have become cynical of anything she utters.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/julia-gillards-tears-too-late-for-those-who-cared/story-fn59niix-1226650281666

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/julia-gillards-tears-too-late-for-those-who-cared/story-fn59niix-1226650281666

[silverfaun]

I expect nothing less from the luvvies. They cannot contemplate the naked truth of just how morally bankrupt Miss Gillard is.

The Victorian police are now going to interview her about the Ben Fordham interview.

It will be interesting to see just how she tries to shut them down just like she has all the others.

[cherry*135]

I agree with posts 1-8.

How many Public Servants working in Canberra? Are they going to vote for TA, who is going to send hatchet men in to cull their jobs?

[cherry*135]

Great link, 2 paragraphs and the rest behind a pay wall:|

Gillards Tears Too Late For Those Who Cared

OP inform us who those who cared are/were.

[azureline**]

I sincerely hope that they interview Ben Fordham and he gets called on his blatant attempt to cast aspersions on the PM.

[cherry*135]

The Fitz Files

I'll say it again: in the wake of the news this week that since the carbon tax was introduced last year, ''electricity generated by highly polluting coal-fired power plants had fallen 14 per cent … while renewable power had soared'', why on earth would the Coalition dismantle it to replace it with a proposal that gives ''financial incentives to companies that cut carbon emissions … [to] cost $3.2 billion over four years''?

Under the current carbon tax system, the heaviest users of electricity pay the most heavily for it; under the Coalition's system, all taxpayers contribute to bribing the polluters to no longer pollute.

Honestly, does that make sense?

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/comment/what-on-earth-is-abbott-thinking-20130518-2jt4r.html#ixzz2UIslUu4K

[silverfaun]

This doesn't belong on this thread, You can't read the link either so what's your point?