on 03-09-2013 06:30 AM
Please note moderators the HEMP party is a registered political party In Australia.... Pre poll mulling voting advice for today in the Page electorate
http://australianhempparty.com/
The writs have been returned. The HEMP Party is officially registered!!
Australia is lagging behind Cannabis legislation
Although industrial hemp is legally grown under licence in all states, we remain the only nation that prohibits the consumption of hemp seed for humans. Hemp seed oil is an extremely healthy food oil, as well as skin oil.
Hemp seed whole, hulled or crushed for oil are used in food products such as muesli bars, cakes, breads, biscuits, butter paste, non-dairy milk, tofu and cheese, ice cream, the essential and cold pressed oils are used in cosmetics (such as shampoo, soaps and moisturisers), as well as having therapeutic qualities similar to evening primrose oil, cod liver oil, flaxseed oil and soybean supplements.
The omega-6:omega-3 ratio of hemp seed is considered optimal for human nutrition. Because of hemp’s high seed yield, and the seeds high oil content, it has been used throughout the millennia in paints, varnishes, and as a lighting fuel.
Pending decision on hemp seed food in Australia: Ministers have sought a review on the proposed standard for low THC hemp as a food. Ministers have agreed to seek advice from the Standing Council on Police and Emergency Services.
HEMP Party Submission: The HEMP Party submission to the NSW Inquiry into the use of Cannabis for medical purposes is available on the State Government website.
http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/6630507/description.html
http://abcnews.go.com/US/marijuana-ruling-signal-end-prohibition-pot/story?id=20118755
on 03-09-2013 07:52 PM
@colic2bullsgirlore wrote:
Please note moderators the HEMP party is a registered political party In Australia.... Pre poll
mullingvoting advice for today in the Page electorate
http://australianhempparty.com/
- NSW Group G
- Queensland Group E
- South Australia Group S
- Tasmania Group K
- Victoria Group F
- Western Australia Group D
The writs have been returned. The HEMP Party is officially registered!!
Australia is lagging behind Cannabis legislation
Although industrial hemp is legally grown under licence in all states, we remain the only nation that prohibits the consumption of hemp seed for humans. Hemp seed oil is an extremely healthy food oil, as well as skin oil.
Hemp seed whole, hulled or crushed for oil are used in food products such as muesli bars, cakes, breads, biscuits, butter paste, non-dairy milk, tofu and cheese, ice cream, the essential and cold pressed oils are used in cosmetics (such as shampoo, soaps and moisturisers), as well as having therapeutic qualities similar to evening primrose oil, cod liver oil, flaxseed oil and soybean supplements.
The omega-6:omega-3 ratio of hemp seed is considered optimal for human nutrition. Because of hemp’s high seed yield, and the seeds high oil content, it has been used throughout the millennia in paints, varnishes, and as a lighting fuel.
Pending decision on hemp seed food in Australia: Ministers have sought a review on the proposed standard for low THC hemp as a food. Ministers have agreed to seek advice from the Standing Council on Police and Emergency Services.
HEMP Party Submission: The HEMP Party submission to the NSW Inquiry into the use of Cannabis for medical purposes is available on the State Government website.
http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/6630507/description.html
http://abcnews.go.com/US/marijuana-ruling-signal-end-prohibition-pot/story?id=20118755
no way and restrict alcohol as well
on 04-09-2013 05:27 AM
^^^^^^ and glue and petrol.... and spray cans
http://www.abc.net.au/health/library/stories/2005/11/24/1831506.htm
and oxycontin ... dont forget xanax,.valium (mummys little helper) oooh they already are restricted
...works well to stop the abuse doesnt it...restriction?
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2008-06-23/hillbilly-heroin-makes-its-mark-on-australian/2480638
http://www.pharmacytechs.net/blog/18-celebrities-who-died-from-prescription-drugs/
gee icyfroth that "Prohibition restrict the sucker list" is getting big
and walnuts (who knew you can get off on walnut fumes)
So what do all the "ban the suckers they are bad for you" substances have in common....hmmm...... they are only bad for you
when they are abused
An important conceptual advance in the past decade has been the understanding that the process of drug addiction shares striking commonalities with neural plasticity associated with natural reward learning and memory.
Basic mechanisms involving dopamine, glutamate, and their intracellular and genomic targets have been the focus of attention in this research area. These two neurotransmitter systems, widely distributed in many regions of cortex, limbic system, and basal ganglia, appear to play a key integrative role in motivation, learning, and memory, thus modulating adaptive behavior.
However, many drugs of abuse exert their primary effects precisely on these pathways and are able to induce enduring cellular alterations in motivational networks, thus leading to maladaptive behaviors.
Current theories and research on this topic are reviewed from an integrative systems perspective, with special emphasis on cellular, molecular, and behavioral aspects of dopamine D-1 and glutamate NMDA signaling, instrumental learning, and drug cue conditioning.
It is the physche of the user not the drug that casues addiction
.......anyways like I said the proof will be in the pudding and the vote... I am reasonably sure you can all look forward to the first
"Hemp Senator" .... if it makes you nervous that's ok...there are pills to help you... big pharma has planned it that way
Education and understanding the disease addiction more is the key not prohibition
.... you can lock things in the top cupboard and hide them away from young inquisitive eyese for as long as you want but where
there is a will there is a way. You are fooling yourself if you think otherwise.
Google America and alcohol prohibition.... worked well to line the pockets of organized crime...... ^^^^ yet the banshee call is ban
alcohol tooo...sounds good in the kitchen court
on 04-09-2013 05:31 AM
Abstract
An important conceptual advance in the past decade has been the understanding that the process of drug addiction shares striking commonalities with neural plasticity associated with natural reward learning and memory.
ie
..... to put it more plainly YOU (YOU BEING THE DRUG OF CHOICE) make me feel good YOU must be good for me bugger the
consequences i do not care whether you are illegal or legal I must have you.....
time for a cupla bex, a cuppa and a good lie down I think
on 04-09-2013 05:42 AM
"we shall not, we shall not be moved"
Temperance Unions and friends of organized crime unite and prohibit the scourge
FROM WIKI
Organized crime
Organized crime received a major boost from Prohibition.
Mafia groups limited their activities to prostitution, gambling, and theft until 1920, when organized bootlegging emerged in response to the effect of Prohibition.
A profitable, often violent, black market for alcohol flourished. Powerful criminal gangs corrupted law enforcement agencies, leading to racketeering. In essence, prohibition provided a financial basis for organized crime to flourish.
Rather than reducing crime,Prohibition had transformed the cities into battlegrounds between opposing bootlegging gangs.
In a study of over 30 major U.S cities during the prohibition years of 1920 and 1921, the number of crimes increased by 24%. Additionally, theft and burglaries increased by 9%, homicide by 12.7%, assaults and battery rose by 13%, drug addiction by 44.6% and police department costs rose by 11.4%.
This was largely the result of “black-market violence” as well as the diverting of law enforcement resources elsewhere. Despite the hope of the prohibitionist movement that the outlawing of alcohol would reduce crime, the reality was that the Volstead Act led to higher crime rates than were experienced prior to prohibition and the establishment of a black market dominated by criminal organizations.
Furthermore, stronger liquor surged in popularity because its potency made it more profitable to smuggle.
To prevent bootleggers from using industrial ethyl alcohol to produce illegal beverages, the government ordered the poisoning of industrial alcohols.
In response, bootleggers hired chemists who successfully renatured the alcohol to make it drinkable.
As a response, the Treasury Department required manufacturers to add more deadly poisons, including the particularly deadly methyl alcohol. New York City medical examiners prominently opposed these policies because of the danger to human life.
As many as 10,000 people died from drinking denatured alcohol before Prohibition ended.[74]
In the "Chemist's War" it does not appear that the government intended to kill Americans with these poisons. They wrongly assumed that people out of fear would stop drinking alcohol.[citation needed] New York City medical examiner Charles Norris believed the government took responsibility for murder when they knew the poison was not deterring people and they continued to poison industrial alcohol (which would be used in drinking alcohol) anyway. Charles Norris said,
"The government knows it is not stopping drinking by putting poison in alcohol..."[Y]et it continues its poisoning processes, heedless of the fact that people determined to drink are daily absorbing that poison. Knowing this to be true, the United States government must be charged with the moral responsibility for the deaths that poisoned liquor causes, although it cannot be held legally responsible." [75]
Al Capone, the Prohibition-era leader of organized crime in Chicago.
Another lethal substance that was often substituted for alcohol was "canned heat," also commonly known as Sterno.
Forcing the substance through a makeshift filter, such as a handkerchief, created a rough liquor substitute. However, the result was poisonous, though not often lethal.
Many of those who were poisoned as a result united to sue the government for reparations after the end of Prohibition.[76]
Making alcohol at home was very common during Prohibition.
Stores sold grape concentrate with warning labels that listed the steps that should be avoided to prevent the juice from fermenting into wine. As well, some drug stores would sell a "medical wine" with around a 22% alcohol content; in order to justify the sale, the wine was given a medicinal taste.[76]
Home-distilled hard liquor was referred to as “bathtub gin” in northern cities, and moonshine in the rural areas of Virginia, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia and Tennessee. Homebrewing good hard liquor was easier than brewing good beer.
on 04-09-2013 06:00 AM
There were few if any production standards during Prohibition, and the potency and quality of products varied greatly, making it difficult to predict their effect.
The production of moonshine during Prohibition was undertaken by an army of amateurs and often resulted in products that could harm or kill the consumer.
Those products were also likely to contain dangerous adulterants, a government requirement for industrial alcohol.
According to Thomas Coffey, "the death rate from poisoned liquor was appallingly high throughout the country.
In 1925 the national toll was 4,154 as compared to 1,064 in 1920.
And the increasing number of deaths created a public relations problem for . . . the drys because they weren't exactly accidental.
"[Will Rogers remarked that "governments used to murder by the bullet only. Now it's by the quart."
Patterns of consumption changed during Prohibition.
It could be argued that Prohibition increased the demand for alcohol among three groups.
It heightened the attractiveness of alcohol to the young by making it a glamour product associated with excitement and intrigue.
The high prices and profits during Prohibition enticed sellers to try to market their products to nondrinkers--undoubtedly, with some success.
Finally, many old-stock Americans and recent immigrants were unwilling to be told that they could not drink.
According to Lee,
"Men were drinking defiantly, with a sense of high purpose, a kind of dedicated drinking that you don't see much of today
...yep prohibition..... great thing that prohibition
on 04-09-2013 08:46 AM
Looking at this mornings posts I see a very good reason for it to remain banned
on 04-09-2013 09:06 AM
because I have nothing intelligent to say.......
p.s. my two cents worth. The trippy stuff in indian hemp does seem to be a contributing factor to the onset of some mental illnesses.
Industrial hemp should not be compared to indian hemp, but as someone earlier said, at this current time they are the same in the eyes of the law.
on 04-09-2013 11:04 AM
@at_wicks_end wrote:
I think all drugs should be illegal, including the socially acceptable one called alcohol.
We wouldn't need the PPL then, there would be a birth rate explosion. There would have to be hundreds more hospitals built, although the patients would receive minimal treatment. There would be a soaring death rate. Back to the cave man days, although they had drugs back then.
on 04-09-2013 11:18 AM
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP) is a 501(c)3 non-profit, international, educational organization comprising former and current police officers, government agents and other law enforcement agents who oppose the current War on Drugs.[2][3] LEAP was founded on March 16, 2002 by five police officers.[1] It is modeled after Vietnam Veterans Against the War, an organization which earned its credibility by utilizing speakers who had been on the frontlines of the war they later denounced. LEAP now has more than 80,000 members and supporters, approximately 5,000 of whom are from law enforcement, though many choose to remain anonymous.[3] There are 148 speakers living in thirty-five different states in the United States and sixteen other countries.[4] LEAP now has members and supporters in 86 countries outside the US.[3]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_Enforcement_Against_Prohibition
on 05-09-2013 07:11 AM
Australia is spending more than a billion dollars each year fighting the ''war on drugs'' but has slashed funding for harm reduction, a landmark analysis has found.
Two thirds of the $1.7 billion Australian state, territory and federal governments spent on drugs went on law enforcement, according to the Government Drug Policy Expenditure in Australia report to be released on Thursday.
Drug experts say Australia's spending simply does not match the evidence and have called for a drastic readjustment in favour of treatment and harm reduction.
Report author Alison Ritter said it was gravely concerning that spending on harm reduction measures had dropped since a similar analysis in 2002.
"It's a shift in policy that hasn't been formally acknowledged," she said. "There is absolutely no reason that investment should have decreased."
The report found Australia spent 2.1 per cent of its drugs budget, or $36 million, on harm reduction in the 2009-10 financial year.
This compared with $361 million, or 21 per cent, on treatment and $1.1 billion on law enforcement.
Professor Ritter, the director of the drug policy modelling program at the University of NSW, said it was difficult to study the effects
of law enforcement, so it was hard to compare it to treatment and harm reduction.
"We don't have good evidence that law enforcement works, and we have anecdotal evidence I suppose that it might not work as a policy," she said.
"We continue to arrest people and drugs keep coming into Australia … and profits continue to be made."