How do we get Julie Bishop sacked?

I mean seriously, she is showing absolute bias. It could not be more blatant.

Photobucket
Message 1 of 47
Latest reply
46 REPLIES 46

How do we get Julie Bishop sacked?

Madam Speaker Bronwyn Bishop - partisan, contradictory and in error

 

First the derogatory nickname used for the Labor Leader of the Opposition was ruled a description then in the next breath It was not a description. 

Either way the new Speaker found using a nickname was not unparliamentary, despite such use appearing to fly in the face of at least two sections of House of Representatives Standing and Sessional Orders** which were not included in those government amendments to these orders that were voted in at 12.44pm on 13 November 2013.

Excerpt from House Of Representatives Hansard of 13 November 2013:

Mr PYNE (Sturt—Minister for Education) (09:22): The reason standing orders should not be suspended on this occasion is that the coalition won the election two months ago and today we want to introduce the carbon tax repeal bills. On the draft daily program, the carbon tax repeal bills are listed for debate. Labor has demonstrated for the last 20 minutes that they will do anything to stand in the way of lowering electricity prices in this country. 
'Electricity Bill' Shorten, as his first political act in the parliament, has desired to get his Manager of Opposition Business to block the repeal of the carbon tax. 
Mr Burke: I rise on a point of order. A large number of comments were made yesterday about people being referred to by correct titles.To have the Leader of the House immediately abrogating that is inappropriate and his comment should be withdrawn. 
The SPEAKER: The Leader of the House was not addressing a member by any title; he was merely using a description and I do not find the term unparliamentarily. [sic]
Mr Burke: On the point of order, Madam Speaker, I am not sure whether you heard the description that was given— 
The SPEAKER: It was not a description. 
Mr Burke: but what we had was something that even the Prime Minister yesterday acknowledged could not be used within the chamber. 
The SPEAKER: I have already ruled on the point of order and you are raising the matter a second time.
 
** 64 No Member to be referred to by name
In the House and the Federation Chamber, a Member shall not be referred to by name, but by one of the following forms, as appropriate:
(a) the Member’s ministerial office (e.g. Prime Minister, Minister for Defence, Attorney-General);
(b) the Member’s parliamentary office (e.g. Leader of the House, Leader of the Opposition, Chief Government Whip);
(c) the Member’s electoral division (e.g. Member for Adelaide).
89 Offensive words
A Member must not use offensive words against:
(a) either House of the Parliament or a Member of the Parliament; or
(b) a member of the Judiciary.

Note:

The new Nationals Member for Page was in the Chamber and voted with other Government MPs to gag debate on the Speaker's ruling.

Message 31 of 47
Latest reply

How do we get Julie Bishop sacked?

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

PRIME Minister Tony Abbott has promised a "respectful" new parliament when it assembles for the first time next week, promising the Labor years will soon fade like "a bad memory".

Addressing the West Australian Liberal branch at its annual conference on Saturday, Mr Abbott pledged a parliament that "discusses the issues, rather than abuses individuals".

The prime minister said the parliament wouldn't impugn the motives of opponents or trash their reputations.

 

 

Lasted two days.......

Message 32 of 47
Latest reply

How do we get Julie Bishop sacked?


@donnashuggy wrote:

How could I get that wrong, of course I meant bronwyn lol, sacking julie would be just mean


I'd be pretty happy with a 2 for 1 deal.

Message 33 of 47
Latest reply

How do we get Julie Bishop sacked?


@topsidesoul wrote:

SHE IS NOT FIT TO BE CLASSES AS MADAM SPEAKER OR EXPECT ANY RESPECT AS A PERSON OR POLITICIAN.

 

All the proof you need she lacks any respect and deserves none...

 

AbbottDitchWitch.jpeg


Even if they are sacked they will not go.................

 

It appears Sophie will not accept no as an answer  from her constituents or the electoral commission going by our

 

parliaments website. Maybe she thought nobody would notice???

 

... I guess it's only been 2 months.??????????

 

http://www.aph.gov.au/Senators_and_Members/Parliamentarian?MPID=00AMU

 

Member for Indi, Victoria

Polls have not been declared in this electorate. See the AEC Virtual Tally Room website for status of the count.

Party Liberal Party of Australia Chamber House of Representatives

atheism is a non prophet organization
Message 34 of 47
Latest reply

How do we get Julie Bishop sacked?

Seriously Colic, that's unreal!! Smiley Surprised

 

that seat was clearly won by Cathy McGowan

 

I had no idea that was going on

Message 35 of 47
Latest reply

How do we get Julie Bishop sacked?

  Managad to adjust this bit Parliamentary service

  • Elected to the House of Representatives for Indi, Victoria, 2001, 2004, 2007 and 2010. Defeated at general elections 2013.

 

but missed deleting the entire page and the rather large font at top that says

 

 

Mrs Sophie Mirabella MP

Sophie Mirabella

Track (What's this?)

Member for Indi, Victoria

atheism is a non prophet organization
Message 36 of 47
Latest reply

How do we get Julie Bishop sacked?

Good question .

Message 37 of 47
Latest reply

How do we get Julie Bishop sacked?

I realise  that you meant Bronwyn Bishop.

I'm just watching now and Grrrrr

Message 38 of 47
Latest reply

How do we get Julie Bishop sacked?

She is very wishy washy.  I said in a past thread that I didn't think she was strong enough for the job, and I am right so far.  Today she didn't hear something which warranted a withdrawal, so she assumed the objection was right and asked the member to withdraw.  That is pathetic.

Message 39 of 47
Latest reply

How do we get Julie Bishop sacked?


@polksaladallie wrote:

She is very wishy washy.  I said in a past thread that I didn't think she was strong enough for the job, and I am right so far.  Today she didn't hear something which warranted a withdrawal, so she assumed the objection was right and asked the member to withdraw.  That is pathetic.


she's not up to the job. her apparent Alzheimer's must disqualify her surely.. Smiley Happy

Message 40 of 47
Latest reply