Humans are NOT to blame for global warming, Greenpeace co-founder

[nero_bolt]

Humans are NOT to blame for global warming, says Greenpeace co-founder, as he insists there is 'no scientific proof' climate change is manmade

• Patrick Moore has poured cold water on manmade global warming theories
• The Canadian said that a hotter earth would actually be better for humans
• He said that there's 'no actual proof' of manmade global warming
• Moore was a member of campaign group Greenpeace for 15 years

There is no scientific proof of man-made global warming and a hotter earth would be ‘beneficial for humans and the majority of other species’, according to a founding member of environmental campaign group Greenpeace.

The assertion was made by Canadian ecologist Patrick Moore, a member of Greenpeace from 1971 to 1986, to U.S senators on Tuesday.

He told The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee: ‘There is no scientific proof that human emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) are the dominant cause of the minor warming of the Earth’s atmosphere over the past 100 years.

If there were such a proof it would be written down for all to see. No actual proof, as it is understood in science, exists.’

Moore pointed out that there was an Ice Age 450million years ago when CO2 was 10 times higher

He said: ‘There is some correlation, but little evidence, to support a direct causal relationship between CO2 and global temperature through the millennia.

The fact that we had both higher temperatures and an ice age at a time when CO2 emissions were 10 times higher than they are today fundamentally contradicts the certainty that human-caused CO2 emissions are the main cause of global warming.’

Even if the earth does warm up, Moore claims that it will be to the advantage of humans and other forms of life, as ‘humans are a tropical species’.

He said: ‘It is extremely likely that a warmer temperature than today’s would be far better than a cooler one.’

Humans, he added, just aren’t capable of predicting global temperature changes.

Moore said that he left Greenpeace because it ‘took a sharp turn to the political left’.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2569215/Humans-not-blame-global-warming-says-Greenpea...

[siggie-reported-by-alarmists]

Gee Monman....... You use the word chuckle..... I say giggle......

Alarmists don't like to  be asked for proof or empirical evidence.....

Why?.......because you don't have any.......just a theory.

C02 has been rising..... tempertures haven't for nearly two decades....next.

[siggie-reported-by-alarmists]

[siggie-reported-by-alarmists]

It is pretty silly when people deny the pause or hiatis....... temps may start going up again..... or they might go down.

[this-one-time-at-bandcamp]

Pretty graphs............done by a computer programmer, using gibberish, not a climate scientist. 

Coral islands grow, they don't sink into the ocean.........the coral islands most in danger from sea level rise are not on any active plate, so arbitrarily stating that the earth is in a constant flux is foolish.........

[siggie-reported-by-alarmists]

---

@this-one-time-at-bandcamp wrote:

Pretty graphs............done by a computer programmer, using gibberish, not a climate scientist. 

Coral islands grow, they don't sink into the ocean.........the coral islands most in danger from sea level rise are not on any active plate, so arbitrarily stating that the earth is in a constant flux is foolish.........

---

  The graphs are pretty........Data sets provided by Climate Scientists.......look into it......Lol.

  Islands can and do sink.... Subsidence happens.

  Believing that the Earth does not change.....is straight out bizarre!

 Poor Alarmists.......

[siggie-reported-by-alarmists]

Quote by Ed Rademacher, chemical engineer: “Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant and, in fact, is a desired....To date, global warming

alarmists have not come close to providing any valid scientific data that proves humans are the sole source of changes in so-called

global average temperatures. Quite simply, correlation between the carbon dioxide levels and the global average temperatures does

not prove a causal relationship.” 

[nero_bolt]

Climate change PROVED to be 'nothing but a lie', claims top meteorologist

THE debate about climate change is finished - because it has been categorically proved NOT to exist, one of the world's leading meteorologists has claimed.

John Coleman, who co-founded the Weather Channel, shocked academics by insisting the theory of man-made climate change was no longer scientifically credible.

Instead, what 'little evidence' there is for rising global temperatures points to a 'natural phenomenon' within a developing eco-system.

In an open letter attacking the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, he wrote: "The ocean is not rising significantly.

"The polar ice is increasing, not melting away. Polar Bears are increasing in number.

"Heat waves have actually diminished, not increased. There is not an uptick in the number or strength of storms (in fact storms are diminishing).

"I have studied this topic seriously for years. It has become a political and environment agenda item, but the science is not valid."

Mr Coleman said he based many of his views on the findings of the NIPCC, a non-governmental international body of scientists aimed at offering an 'independent second opinion of the evidence reviewed by the IPCC.'

He added: "There is no significant man-made global warming at this time, there has been none in the past and there is no reason to fear any in the future.

"Efforts to prove the theory that carbon dioxide is a significant greenhouse gas and pollutant causing significant warming or weather effects have failed.

"There has been no warming over 18 years."

http://www.express.co.uk/news/nature/526191/Climate-change-is-a-lie-global-warming-not-real-claims-w...

[nero_bolt]