I don't like Tony Abbott

[donnashuggy]

He is the worst leader we have ever had in Australia.

[fourandsixpants]

[cherry*135]

---

@*julia*2010 wrote:

whether it was a rhetorical question 

or not, the point was, it was regarding 

someone making references to the ex 

pm's big **bleep**.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

No, I think you misunderstand.

I did not want to know who posted it, yet you made a post stating that.

The point wasn't even about anyones posterior, that was used as an example only...I could have used the colour of her hair or why she got new glasses before a major announcement, or the shape of her suit jackets, or her partners occupation... THE POINT WAS - posters who don't approve of criticism of our current PM, doesn't mind the same about other party's PM.  That is called hypocrisy.

What gives with that?  Tony Abbott's is looking old. not allowed. JG posterior( allegedly) too big.. allowed, hilarious.

I wrote the post, I know the point of it.

[cherry*135]

2011

Abbott's frozen fury lingers beyond his words

...... the "**bleep** happens" dismissal is nonetheless a regrettable phrase in such circumstances. Certainly, Ian MacKinney, the father of the slain soldier did not appreciate it.

[aps1080]

---

@am*3 wrote:

2011

Abbott's frozen fury lingers beyond his words

...... the "**bleep** happens" dismissal is nonetheless a regrettable phrase in such circumstances. Certainly, Ian MacKinney, the father of the slain soldier did not appreciate it.

---

Each to their own.

His father may have had an issue with it, his widow didn't.

I used the same words to my mother when she was worried about what I got up to, I just said that s*** happens

and if it does, well so be it, I would have gone out doing what I enjoyed doing.

[evil_akuma_2002]

---

Sounds about right. Makes baseless accusations and then when asked to provide facts or references tries to offload by telling ever one to find Google “information” themselves. Perhaps it may be an idea to Google before you make niggling baseless/false accusations. That way you might not appear to be total clueless DH

---

You know, Tezza - I was going to get back to you with that information you requested demanded, but then I thought, 'Nah. Why bother?'

'Only trolls without substance use enlarged, emboldened type to get their message across, attempting to bully others by use of forceful language and text.'

So, forget hoping for my response - it ain't gonna happen, and feel free to take that whichever way you like, as I'm not going to bother with your petulant and demanding attitude any further.

[idlewhile]

---

@evil_akuma_2002 wrote:

---

Sounds about right. Makes baseless accusations and then when asked to provide facts or references tries to offload by telling ever one to find Google “information” themselves. Perhaps it may be an idea to Google before you make niggling baseless/false accusations. That way you might not appear to be total clueless DH

---

You know, Tezza - I was going to get back to you with that information you requested demanded, but then I thought, 'Nah. Why bother?'

'Only trolls without substance use enlarged, emboldened type to get their message across, attempting to bully others by use of forceful language and text.'

So, forget hoping for my response - it ain't gonna happen, and feel free to take that whichever way you like, as I'm not going to bother with your petulant and demanding attitude any further.

---

Reminds me of someone else on here who used to ask for links, more info et al. It got so bad that other members got fed up with her.

Now she's  the "lecturer" the "spelling police" the "cut and paster of reams of information" and the definitions  since she  discovered google.

Pretty soon she'll have her Google Degree in social commentating, can't wait for that. 

[boris1gary]

It's hilarious that the far right back up their lines with anecdotal evidence (smirk) then ask others to supply proof of theirs, it goes like this...

far righter - I don't believe that, where's the link?

others - here you go

far righter - Oh I can't be bothered to read all of those words, here is some more gossip and lies to prove I am right.

[idlewhile]

---

@boris1gary wrote:

It's hilarious that the far right back up their lines with anecdotal evidence (smirk) then ask others to supply proof of theirs, it goes like this...

far righter - I don't believe that, where's the link?

others - here you go

far righter - Oh I can't be bothered to read all of those words, here is some more gossip and lies to prove I am right.

---

---

@boris1gary wrote:

It's hilarious that the far right back up their lines with anecdotal evidence (smirk) then ask others to supply proof of theirs, it goes like this...

far righter - I don't believe that, where's the link?

others - here you go

far righter - Oh I can't be bothered to read all of those words, here is some more gossip and lies to prove I am right.

---

Bullying and ridiculing, humiliating and laughing at members who have a spelling mistake or a language problem is a trait that is unattractive. Many have noticed it coming from the left majority on here, such a poor way to conduct oneself on a social media platform. 

Also accusing members of lying all the time, name calling, intimidation,   it's playing ugly.

[gleee58]

Many doesn't count when it's a few people using many IDs.

[idlewhile]

---

@gleee58 wrote:

Many doesn't count when it's a few people using many IDs.

---

is that an accusation? because if so you are violating cs rules.