I feel sorry for

[Anonymous]

this forum.

Have people become so discerning that they will post on just about anyones posts?

Is that what is has come to?

it would appear so.

Those were the days my friends..........................................

[the*scarlet*pimpernel]

---

@serendipityricho wrote:

In from work-noticed a new thread and read 4 pages.

Things have changed--my posting has as well.

Back in the old days -i would invade cat lovers threads with my classic--

I love cats--but could not eat a whole one in one sitting.

-geez- got reported -slapped and hate mail.

Then i worked out 90% of posters own at least one cat.

-still havent tasted cat meat--but im told it tastes like chicken..................Richo.

---

ahhh the memories.

[*pepe]

---

@am*3 wrote:

''I asked a question. Obviously I shouldn't have. I've never seen that someone's gender is relevant.''

Fair enough, but that doesn't mean everyone else thinks the same way. Was the poster that made that post not entitled to post their own  view on this issue without being pulled up for it? (and ongoing harrassment over it?)

---

does this entitlement to post their own view without being pulled up and harassed over it extend to the OP of this thread too, even though her view isn't popular?

[collect247]

No you're wrong nevy kept nagging that poster about an irrelevant issue and that poster in my opinion had every right to say what they said and it looks like the mods didn't see it that way after a complaint was made.

[boris1gary]

---

@serendipityricho wrote:

In from work-noticed a new thread and read 4 pages.

Things have changed--my posting has as well.

Back in the old days -i would invade cat lovers threads with my classic--

I love cats--but could not eat a whole one in one sitting.

-geez- got reported -slapped and hate mail.

Then i worked out 90% of posters own at least one cat.

-still havent tasted cat meat--but im told it tastes like chicken..................Richo.

---

[cherry*135]

---

@*pepe wrote:

---

@am*3 wrote:

''I asked a question. Obviously I shouldn't have. I've never seen that someone's gender is relevant.''

Fair enough, but that doesn't mean everyone else thinks the same way. Was the poster that made that post not entitled to post their own  view on this issue without being pulled up for it? (and ongoing harrassment over it?)

---

does this entitlement to post their own view without being pulled up and harassed over it extend to the OP of this thread too, even though her view isn't popular?

---

I see that (my view only) as an opening poster putting whatever topic they like out there in the opening posts for others to comment on and discuss ...  those replies could be positive or negative.

All that quoting and requoting because 1 person took exception to (didn't agree with) one irrelevant (in terms of the whole thread) comment.?

[collect247]

I agree they could only be positive or negative unless there is another tive that I don't know about?

[collect247]

You were nearly right flashie as one padlock was handed out

[chuk_77]

so there are posts missing? Thank god for that. Thought I was going mental trying to make sense of the posts.

Wonder if duff will come back and see what she started? 😄

Its really hilarious when I see one statement then striahgt away..."was that aimed at me? This is part of the problems here, people are far to precious 

[izabsmiling]

---

@izabsmiling wrote:

---

@love*today wrote:
**bleep** kudo the wrong post...i thought it was about the id that has been *cough missing...

---

do you mean me ? 

---

or someone else ?

[love*today]

yeah heaps and heaps gone chuk....im spewing about my excellent posts, i thought some bps said they like to leave the comments so everyone can see the person for what they are?!! There are new posters on here that need to get to see the real me **bleep**.....
And another reason to leave the button alone, duff needs to read this and have a good laugh!
lol chuk, yep hilarious!!!!