- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on โ27-11-2013 05:27 PM
Good idea or not to lower the threshold??? Changes to the GST for online international purchases seems to be getting a push today in the media.
Solved! Go to Solution.
Accepted Solutions
Is it a loophole?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on โ27-11-2013 06:18 PM
Is it a loophole?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on โ28-11-2013 01:17 PM
According to a news broadcast from the ABC the average on-line OS purchase last year was $41.00, ponder that.
So they stick 10% on OS purchases, big deal (for myself).
Recently an exhaust oxygen sensor on my Mini Cooper failed. To purchase one in Australia (from BMW) was over $500. I purchased the same Bosch sensor from the USA (Amazon) delivered for $82.00. So far I have purchased brake pads from the UK, and an engine OBD (data analyser) from the US for much less than is charged here.
It is time to accept the reality of "global village"
nษฅยบษพ
Is it a loophole?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on โ28-11-2013 03:03 PM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Buttercup: You mock my pain! Man in Black: Life is pain, Highness. Anyone who says differently is selling something.
Is it a loophole?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on โ29-11-2013 03:31 AM
@donnashuggy wrote:In a lot of cases Australian online retailers are disadvantaged by postage costs, perhaps the Australian Government could do something about that instead to assist -
Bingo.
For some reason we (the Australian tax payers) subsidise post from China. The Chinese pay to get the item to shore here, we pay for it the rest of the way. I should point out this also works in reverse too.
Clearly however there's a lot, lot more products coming into Australia from China than the other way around.
I could compete on price against Chinese traders on item prices, I can NOT compete on post prices when a parcel from China costs $1.00 to send here but the same size parcel costs me $6.95 to send within Australia.
Is it a loophole?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on โ27-11-2013 05:33 PM
I think it is a good idea....It should encourage Australian buyers to shop here rather than overseas. It won't be reviewed until March next year I think ??
Is it a loophole?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on โ27-11-2013 05:39 PM
Is it a loophole?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on โ27-11-2013 05:49 PM
Terrible idea. It'll be a nightmare to administer, causing bottlenecks and delays to everyody's parcels.
It's unlikely to add only 10% to the cost of goods. A couple of years ago I imported a guitar that was just over the $1000 threshold and was charged an $89 quarantine fee and a $55 document handling fee (plus duty and GST). Imagine paying those kind of fees on everything you import.
For those who think the current threshold is high, consider that in 1985 it was $400. According to the Reserve Bank's inflation calculator, that's equivalent to $1030 in today's dollars, so it hasn't increased in real terms for the past 30-odd years.
Is it a loophole?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on โ27-11-2013 05:53 PM
agreed. i doubt it can be made to work without costing more than it takes in, gerry harvey's lobbying someone somewhere.
Is it a loophole?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on โ27-11-2013 05:54 PM
In recent weeks, Australian retailers and state premiers have increased calls for the threshold to be lowered significantly below the current $1000 threshold or abandoned altogether, saying it gives foreign retailers an unfair advantage over local retailers
The National Retail Association wants shoppers to be charged GST on overseas purchases worth more than $20.
Chief executive Trevor Evans said earlier this week that the current GST-free threshold of $1000 a parcel was introduced before online shopping became widespread.
Is it a loophole?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on โ27-11-2013 06:15 PM
They may not just be trying to catch the online buyers, there are a lot of sellers that are not even online who bring in less than $1000 worth of good 5 days a week.
It does not cost them any more for multiple freight because they pay by the kilo, but they have to pay nothing on GST or Duty if they do it that way.
Is it a loophole?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on โ27-11-2013 06:18 PM
Is it a loophole?

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on โ27-11-2013 06:25 PM
@lakeland27 wrote:agreed. i doubt it can be made to work without costing more than it takes in, gerry harvey's lobbying someone somewhere.
I think this will be one fight Gerry will not win so he will just have to be more competitive and stop offering 2 year no interest payments for which you have to pay full price for the item/s and end up paying far more than is you pay cash or put it on your CC.
Me, if I can't pay for and get a discount for paying up front I don't buy it.
Keep it nice, I might cry if you write anything upsetting (like not)
Is it a loophole?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on โ27-11-2013 06:47 PM
In UK the threshold is about 17pounds. If we would go as low as that it would mean that every time you buy something over that value it will have to be carded and when you go to collect it AP will have to get the money. That will be especially annoying to people who work and cannot get items sent to work. And it will mean lot more work for AP, and some POs are already so busy that there is always queue, from the morning till they close - like the one in South Yarra.
They say "substantially" reduce the threshold, well put it down to $500 would be substantial, and would not affect me at all.
Voltaire: โThose Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities, Can Make You Commit Atrocitiesโ .

