on 26-01-2015 05:56 PM
So they give this filthy pig bail and i bet he gets let off because the victim hasnt been born yet
on 27-01-2015 04:08 PM
It sounds like a minefield, as you say, Colic. It is that bugger of a word "proof" that is elusive.
If you have a look at Muirhead's case, he pled guilty, but even so, the police had been monitoring him for one year before they had the proof. The images are transferred peer to peer, and Interpol work for months and years to disentangle the tentacles of these groups.
The police and the judiciary might know a crime has been committed, but without the proof, their hands are tied. This applies to all crimes of course.
on 28-01-2015 12:25 AM
Please tell me I am wrong but it actually reads like you are defending this filthy, scum....
I don't know this person to draw a conclusion, and nither do do, God will judge, and God doesn't need us doing it for him. Let those without sin throw the first stone.
Of course we haven't seen these images first hand...doesn't mean they don't exist.
Does it mean that they do exist, or that this person had or has something to do with it? I'm sorry but your asking me to hate this guy and wish bad things on him like you and other are doing based on what corrupt sadistic police say.
As for you proving anything, time and time again...we have only had your side of the story...and it is an extremely biased one.
Am I making up what happened to Kelly Thomas, John T Williams, the 12yo boy in Clevland, and myself? You give me far too much credit.
You take every opportunity to knock the police and it is really wearing rather thin...where in the name of all the is holy did you come to the conclusion that the police raped any women or children.
I was raped, robbed, abused, and framed by the Franklin County sheriffs and jail guards, then thrown in head first where they knew a woman would be molested at best. The Grove City police did much of the same but not to the extreeme.
Did you actually READ the article?
Was it written by those who cator to police?, no thanks
on 28-01-2015 02:47 AM
on 28-01-2015 07:17 AM
Did you actually READ the article?
Was it written by those who cator to police?, no thanks
Then may I respectfully suggest that you do...then you might realise why everyone is condemning this person.
And please don't quote YOUR 4th Amendment..it means diddly squat in Australia.
on 28-01-2015 10:28 AM
I'm sorry, please don't call your loving police and have me beaten and raped.
on 28-01-2015 10:38 AM
@softail-joanie wrote:I'm sorry, please don't call your loving police and have me beaten and raped.
Yeah....the police are going to travel all the way to usa just to rape you...FGS..give it a rest.
on 28-01-2015 12:26 PM
Joannie, how on earth do you expect police and the general public to react to a person who has child pornography (and clearly child abuse) on their computer? and talks to others online about plans to abuse his own child?
It takes a special kind of person to do that.........................
If he is innocent, his lawyer will show that in court.
on 28-01-2015 12:47 PM
@softail-joanie wrote:I'm sorry, please don't call your loving police and have me beaten and raped.
Why is it always about you? Can't we discuss on our Australian forum one single subject without you bringing into it your problems with US?
on 28-01-2015 01:25 PM
Joannie, how on earth do you expect police and the general public to react to a person who has child pornography (and clearly child abuse) on their computer? and talks to others online about plans to abuse his own child?
So if I buy a computer at a yard sale, or thrift store, one that has been donated by an unknown person, am I responsable for whats on it before I can get around to deleting it? As for the second part of your question, I know how things on a discussiom board like this one or others can be twisted. Not very long ago, I was accused of going after, or planing on going after another's kids. I won't say who, but it was posted and many choose to believe the worst of me. Maybe that is part of why I just don't take things at face value. Because fact is I just can't know for sure, am i'mthe last person who will go along to get along. If these things are true, if I can see them being true, then I would agree with those who want to put him under the jail. But likely if they were true, they would give him a badge and put him in charge of a police agency.
t takes a special kind of person to do that......................... If he is innocent, his lawyer will show that in court.
Sure, I'm always gonmna side with truth and justice, but lets just hope if he really isn't guilty, then he really does get a fair trial. It's not like the jails and prisons are only occupied by the guilty, I'm proof of that.
.
on 28-01-2015 01:34 PM
. But likely if they were true, they would give him a badge and put him in charge of a police agency.
Just when I think you cannot type anything more ridiculous than some of the garbage you come out with you go and do it.
Yes, he is innocent until proven guilty BUT for you to say what you do about the police is just so absurd that I think you seriously need help...your obsession with the police as the bad guys is way beyond normal..