Just watched 60 minutes.

[horizon1907]

Don't normally watch 60 Minutes, but did tonight. How utterly disturbing was that "story" about the  "Baby Gammy "couple  ?? 

I hope the powers that be, keep an a very close eye on that whole case.  Something just doesn't gell ? 😞 

[karliandjacko]

---

@am*3 wrote:

@twinkles wrote: Air time given to the couple has a positive result. Everyone now knows who they are, what they look like, where they live.  Their every move will be watched and monitored by many. Better this way? 

It was no secret who they were & where they live though. No advantage to people outside their local area knowing what they look like.

IF you had watched all the program you would have heard him say that after his convictions he didn't move away and hide. People where they live know who he is and what he did (previous convictions).

---

He obviously doesn't care about the young people he abused in the past at all or he would not have gone on national TV and put his face on their TV screens.  They are the ones I felt for last night. Imagine the shock of seeing the face who caused you so much pain sobbing away on TV looking for sympathy as though he was the one wronged.  I expect it would shatter the peaceful evening well and truly.

[lionrose.7]

I saw then on NZ TV to night, he is a pedophile and will always be a pedophile.

He was complaining on TV that he should have got some money back for the child they did not take home, made me so angry, he was crying and I wanted to slap him and more.

[***super_nova***]

---

@am*3 wrote:
Surrogate mother - a woman who bears a child on behalf of another woman, either from her own egg fertilized by the other woman's partner, or from the implantation in her womb of a fertilized egg from the other woman.

---

Yes?  I do understand that.  The question here is that the surrogate  claims that the eggs were not donated by the man's  "Australian" partner but by another woman who is Asian.  Did she realise that the man's partner is Asian?  How did she know who donated the egg?

[***super_nova***]

---

@karliandjacko wrote:

---

I wonder why they used a surrogate instead of the mother carrying the child.

---

Maybe she is not able to carry a child?

[tasfleur]

Post 31 should read "Farnells", not Farrells, apologies for the mistake.

[azureline**]

---

@***super_nova*** wrote:

---

@karliandjacko wrote:

---

I wonder why they used a surrogate instead of the mother carrying the child.

---

Maybe she is not able to carry a child?

---

Didn't he say they did IVF for 10 years? They married in 2004 according to some media.

[twinkles**stars]

"

---

@am*3 wrote:

@twinkles wrote: Air time given to the couple has a positive result. Everyone now knows who they are, what they look like, where they live.  Their every move will be watched and monitored by many. Better this way? 

It was no secret who they were & where they live though. No advantage to people outside their local area knowing what they look like.

IF you had watched all the program you would have heard him say that after his convictions he didn't move away and hide. People where they live know who he is and what he did (previous convictions).

---

I had no desire to watch it all. His face will be remebered by all....there is a chance they may move at any time, even next door to you or me. 

[twinkles**stars]

I doubt anyone he abused wasn't aware of the program airing.

[ten*teeny*tiny*toes]

I may go to hell and back for saying this but he has the stereotypical look of that older Aussie man bossing his Asian bride around the supermarket. Creepy,creepy, creepy.

[azureline**]

---

@ten*teeny*tiny*toes wrote:

I may go to hell and back for saying this but he has the stereotypical look of that older Aussie man bossing his Asian bride around the supermarket. Creepy,creepy, creepy.

---

you will have company.................