If you give a gonski apparently there is a petition on the gonski site.
You can see what your school stands to gain on the site:
JMK: "But people who actually DO think, know that it does matter...a lot."
So explain your position JMK, bearing in mind Australia's position represents 1.4%, and yours is based upon ?????? litterbugs?
Silverfaun ....that is why the Gonski report was done ..A lot of input went into it...To improve the system 
I don't think Mr Pyne accepts the findings .....which could mean that Australia has been conned (deliberately)
What do you think about the Coalitions Education Policy ?
Can you tell me about it please?
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Australian Broadcasting Corporation
Broadcast: 15/10/2013
Education Minister Christopher Pyne says his party believes in four-year funding agreements for education, and says the Government will keep working until they've repealed the carbon tax.
Transcript
CHRISTOPHER PYNE: Well, we've had a needs-based funding system since the year 2000. The SES (socioeconomic status) funding system is a needs-based funding system. More money goes to the schools that need it and less money goes to the schools that are well off, so...
ANNABEL CRABB: But the Gonski model is about individual students' needs. Is that a permanent arrangement now under your Government?
CHRISTOPHER PYNE: Well, we've said that we will adopt the new school funding model from the 1st of January next year for the next four years and have the same funding envelope as the previous Government. So yes, we have accepted that there is a new school funding model, but I believe there's a great deal of work that needs to be done to make it work, because Labor's left us in a mess. Now, we've made a good start but there's a lot more to be done.
ANNABEL CRABB: And what about the states that haven't signed up? You said during the election that they would be eligible for the same money that Labor had offered them without any of the strings attached. Does that deal stand, every cent?
CHRISTOPHER PYNE: Well, we will introduce an Education Bill amendment at some stage over the next few months to dismantle much of the command and control that Labor had built into the Australian Education Act because we believe the best placed people to manage the school system are those that own and operate it, which are of course the states and territories and of course the Catholic systems and the independent schools.
ANNABEL CRABB: But the command-and-control elements are the bits that require the states to honour their element of the funding deal, isn't it? Why are you abolishing the parts that actually safeguard that state contribution?
CHRISTOPHER PYNE: Well, we think that the states and territories should be treated like adult governments. We don't believe that Canberra should be condescending and patronising towards the states and territories. So I'll sit down with all the state and territory ministers over the coming weeks and months, sort through the mess that Labor's created for us.
But you can be absolutely certain: we'll implement our policies, not just in school funding but also in more autonomy for local schools to make local decisions, a stronger curriculum, more parental engagement and better teacher quality.
ANNABEL CRABB: Christopher Pyne, we are right out of time but thanks for being with us on 7.30 tonight.
They are still gonna give the money.
What i want is for the Federal gov to have more control over how money is spent that is given to schools.
Cause i believe some schools waste it.
EG, i know a school who just spent a fortune on an office area renovation. New carpet, new doors, knock down walls, put up new walls and the office staff all got fancy new uniforms.
Meanwhile, the computers take 10 minutes to load one page, thats if they are working at all
