Labor to give LGBTI candidates preference

[village_person]

Labor Party to consider affirmative action plan for gay candidates

FEDERAL and state Labor would have quotas for gay and transgender candidates in winnable seats under a divisive affirmative action plan.

The deal, believed to be between the dominant Left and the Old Guard factions, has been done ahead of this weekend’s state conference, and draws Opposition Leader Bill Shorten into the debate.

The issue, to be discussed last night by Labor’s Rules Committee, has been labelled “toxic” after some in Rainbow Labor, who met to discuss the proposal on Tuesday night, did not want to speak out for fear of being labelled homophobes.

Some have also questioned why the affirmative action plan for the LGBTI community would start in four years but an affirmative action plan for indigenous candidates would not begin until 2030.

[...]

http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/labor-party-to-consider-affirmative-action-plan-for-ga...

Why not seek the best candidate for each seat? This is pure lunacy which puts in doubt the ALP's claim to be the 'party of ideas'. It seems as if the ALP has run out of ideas.

[peteepie]

Wonder how they'll figure out the percentages...could be some blues between the blokes and the sheilas and the bloke/sheilas and the sheila/blokes and the inbetweeners and the Questionings...you left the Q out of the heading by the way

[myoclon1cjerk]

Is that the same Courier Mail that reported the Greens wanted to legalise crystal meth ?

[village_person]

---

@myoclon1cjerk wrote:
Is that the same Courier Mail that reported the Greens wanted to legalise crystal meth ?

---

Stephen Gay aims to become LGBTIQ candidate for Labor under new affirmative target

[...]

The affirmative action policy reads, "The minimum number of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Intersex and Queer/Questioning [LGBTIQ] candidates for Federal Parliament, the Queensland Legislative Assembly and each endorsed local government team shall be a minimum of 5 per cent of held and winnable seats".

[...]

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-10-31/stephen-gay-wants-become-lgbtiq-candidate-labor/7979288

The ABC is an impeccable news source. The matter was also reported in Pravda and the Tierra del Fuego Gazette but there is no need to go overboard is there.

[chameleon54]

Typical Labor........... grandstanding and making pathetic, hollow, symbolic gestures when they think they are onto a populist cause. What happened to merrit ?????????

If they where serious about the job, they would dump dopey Shorten and elect Penny as the leader. She is a lot more intelligent, articulate and in touch with the real world than anyone else in the party.

A female, Asian, Lesbian prime minister. Now that would really show Australia has come of age. Who knows, I might even vote for her myself.

[not_for_sale2025]

---

@chameleon54 wrote:

Typical Labor........... grandstanding and making pathetic, hollow, symbolic gestures when they think they are onto a populist cause. What happened to merrit ?????????

If they where serious about the job, they would dump dopey Shorten and elect Penny as the leader. She is a lot more intelligent, articulate and in touch with the real world than anyone else in the party.

A female, Asian, Lesbian prime minister. Now that would really show Australia has come of age. Who knows, I might even vote for her myself.

---

Why not go the whole slog and suggest a female, Asian, lesbian with cancer, AIDS and ingrown toenails. Lets not be discriminatory; all for one and one for all I say. Sheesh, lets throw in a muslim as well. The politicians wouldn't give a damn about people with any of those conditions or backgrounds. It's all about votes!

[chameleon54]

---

@not_for_sale2016 wrote:

---

@chameleon54 wrote:

Typical Labor........... grandstanding and making pathetic, hollow, symbolic gestures when they think they are onto a populist cause. What happened to merrit ?????????

If they where serious about the job, they would dump dopey Shorten and elect Penny as the leader. She is a lot more intelligent, articulate and in touch with the real world than anyone else in the party.

A female, Asian, Lesbian prime minister. Now that would really show Australia has come of age. Who knows, I might even vote for her myself.

---

Why not go the whole slog and suggest a female, Asian, lesbian with cancer, AIDS and ingrown toenails. Lets not be discriminatory; all for one and one for all I say. Sheesh, lets throw in a muslim as well. The politicians wouldn't give a damn about people with any of those conditions or backgrounds. It's all about votes!

---

That is the point I was trying to make. With Labor its all about cheap stunt tokenism. The sad truth is while Penny Wong is probably the best candidate by far to lead the party and would make a suitable prime minister she will probably never get the chance.

If Labor had the guts to back her , they might find Australians are a bit more mature than they give us credit for. Labor just seem to target the lowest common denominator with thier electoral campaigns and leaders. Offering up a village idiot like Bill Shorten for us to vote for is an insult to our intelligence, as was their last election campaign, full of bannal lies and spin.

The end result .... a fairly mediocre Liberal offering beat them.

It just seems to be a race to the bottom for both of our major parties. Trump and Hillary here we come.

[davidc4430]

---

@chameleon54 wrote:

Typical Labor........... grandstanding and making pathetic, hollow, symbolic gestures when they think they are onto a populist cause. What happened to merrit ?????????

If they where serious about the job, they would dump dopey Shorten and elect Penny as the leader. She is a lot more intelligent, articulate and in touch with the real world than anyone else in the party.

A female, Asian, Lesbian prime minister. Now that would really show Australia has come of age. Who knows, I might even vote for her myself.

---

yeah, lets stop all these weirdo groups getting into govt.

it would be great if we got back to just men of a certain age running things both in govt and business like it was back when things were good.

dont ya hate seeing women in the background during question time all smiley wearing nice outfits. obviously just their to look good, not there because they make govt better.

and women in the boardroom! no sooner did we let them in and they needed rooms for babys, time off for having babys ect.

best place for a woman is at home with the babys.

now they wanna let gay people in! what will they require to make it possible to do the job? pink painted board rooms?

and if i dont feel comfortable **bleep** standing next to a guy checking me out? will i get compensation? i bet i wont!

trump president! gays in govt! the worlds going crazy!

[village_person]

---

@not_for_sale2016 wrote:

---

---

Why not go the whole slog and suggest a female, Asian, lesbian with cancer, AIDS and ingrown toenails. Lets not be discriminatory; all for one and one for all I say. Sheesh, lets throw in a muslim as well. The politicians wouldn't give a damn about people with any of those conditions or backgrounds. It's all about votes!

---

Do you know something we don't :)? Maybe she's toying with the idea of becoming a muslim. 

[bushies.girl]

Geeeze if they keep going the wont be enough letters in alphabet to cover it all lol