18-05-2019 01:04 PM - edited 18-05-2019 01:06 PM
Labor has accused the Liberal Party of deliberately using the official colours of the Australian Electoral Commission to mislead Chinese-speaking voters in a marginal seat, despite the AEC stating the posters are within the laws.
The posters, which were written in Mandarin and have appeared at booths in the Melbourne seat of Chisholm, state the "correct" way to vote is to preference the Liberal candidate first.
A photo taken by Victorian Trades Hall secretary Luke Hilakari showed a poster printed in the purple and white colours of the AEC tied to a fence next to an official AEC voting banner.
The text of the poster appears to be written in the style of an official instruction to voters:
"Correct way to vote.
"On the green voting card, put preference 1 next to the Liberal Party. The other boxes can be numbered from smallest to highest."
Australian Labor Party state secretary Kosmos Samaras has confirmed to the ABC that the party lodged a formal complaint with the AEC.
AEC state manager Steve Kennedy has told the ABC that the commission has considered the complaint and found the posters did not breach election laws.
"Whilst the AEC would prefer that parties or lobby groups don't use the colour purple, the AEC doesn't own the colour purple and there is nothing restricting the use of this," he said.
The Liberal Party has declined to comment.
Both the major parties are running female Chinese-Australian candidates in the seat of Chisholm after it was vacated by Liberal-turned-independent Julia Banks.
Roughly 20 per cent of the population in the electorate, in Melbourne's eastern suburbs, are of Chinese ancestry.
The battle for the seat is likely to come down to the Liberal Party's Gladys Liu and Labor's Jennifer Yang.
I'm not a political animal, but even I can see this is woefully wrong.
How does this not breach election laws?
on 18-05-2019 01:22 PM
on 18-05-2019 01:29 PM
on 18-05-2019 01:32 PM
very deceptive.
Libs might say that Labor are only complaining because they didn’t think of doing that.
They must have known that the translation of the text would be made early . . . . as 20% of that electorate are Chinese-Australians and BOTH Lib and Labor candidates are Chinese-Australians.
on 18-05-2019 01:34 PM
of course as it doesnt say it was produced and displayed by the liberal party nothing can be done, unless someone admits to doing it.
but someone knows who printed it out there dont they?
not something you print on a home printer.
on 18-05-2019 01:42 PM
I thought all election material had to be ‘authorised’ and have the name of who authorised the material printed on it.
My mandarin is a bit rusty, so I don’t know if the sign carries an authorisation!
on 18-05-2019 01:43 PM
https://www.aec.gov.au/About_AEC/Publications/backgrounders/polling-places-offences.htm
Misleading or deceptive publications s. 329
on 18-05-2019 01:45 PM
And what is it with voting - using a pencil on a string. lol
All legal documents require - ink.
on 18-05-2019 01:45 PM
I guess this may end up in the Court of Disputed Returns if the Libs win the seat.
Either way, the electoral laws need tightening.
on 18-05-2019 01:49 PM