@debra9275 wrote:
@chameleon54 wrote:
While its easy to say look here, look there, quote this, quote that, the statistics simply don't lie. While Labor has 25% more criminal convictions than the Liberals at a federal level, any reasonable person would agree it is too small a statistical sample to draw any definite conclusions.
But when you look at state level politics where a reasonable statistical number is available, the numbers clearly show an elected Labor member of parliament is 3.5 times more likely to be engaged in criminal activity than an elected Liberal member. You can make all the excuses or diversions you like, but the statistics simply don't lie. Labor politicians are vastly more corrupt than Liberal politicians. STATISTICAL FACT !!!
No, I'm not saying look over there.,, I'm saying they're all as bad as each other. Just that you get a. Lot more media coverage and outrage for only one of the political parties
as far as criminal convictions. The liberals are just better at it. A recent example is Angus Taylor who should've been charged with "forging documents". Passed to the AFP by the NSW police... the outcome was ... he said he was sorry, so it's OK
That is simply not true. The facts show Labor is 3.5 times worse at it than the Liberals. Its not about media coverage.....these are criminal convictions by our court system. Nothing to do with reporting in the media ! ...........PROVEN FACT..........elected state Labor representatives have a minimum of 3.5 times more criminal convictions while in office than any other political party in the nations history..
3BrNBBRz4UYdo+!~~60_7.JPG "chameleon54"){kind=avatar}
