on 21-04-2014 11:16 AM
on 21-04-2014 11:08 PM
on 21-04-2014 11:09 PM
Are they really that pale?
on 22-04-2014 12:25 AM
Your ID might have worked better if you made it Matthew Bob Luke and John. The Bob gets chopped off on the boards. Haha bad luck 😄
on 22-04-2014 01:41 AM
It's ok J, Bob has an identity crisis 🙂
Like Arthur and Martha have 🙂
on 22-04-2014 06:14 AM
Because, as a human, I have a carnivores mouth and digestive tract.... not a herbivores.
There are major differences between the two.......humans are designed to eat meat.....so I do....
on 22-04-2014 07:33 AM
Meat is highly nutritious and there are many nutrients in there that you can't get, in the required amount from plants, to keep you healthy.
Meat contributes to your bone density.
on 22-04-2014 07:54 AM
@azureline** wrote:Meat is highly nutritious and there are many nutrients in there that you can't get, in the required amount from plants, to keep you healthy.
Meat contributes to your bone density.
Are you saying Meat is the ONLY way of getting these nutrients adequately? How do vegetarians/vegan survive?
on 22-04-2014 09:17 AM
Everyone is an individual.
My DIL is a Buddhist.. she was very ill and doctors thought she had MS, after extensive tests they admitted they had no idea what was wrong with her until my son asked about her no meat diet.
She now has to eat meat. Not a lot but some............ her health has returned to normal. It's hard work substituting for meat.
on 22-04-2014 10:39 AM
because roast pork and crispy crackling is delicious 🙂
on 22-04-2014 10:58 AM
@siggie-reported-by-alarmists wrote:
Because, as a human, I have a carnivores mouth and digestive tract.... not a herbivores.
There are major differences between the two.......humans are designed to eat meat.....so I do....
humans, in fact, are not designed to eat meat:
Are human beings anatomically more similar to natural carnivores or to natural herbivores? Let’s find out….
But aren’t humans anatomically suited to be omnivores?
Nope. We don’t anatomically match up with omnivorous animals anymore than we do with carnivorous ones. Omnivores are more similar to carnivores than they are to herbivores. For a more detailed summary table that compares the properties of carnivores, herbivores, and omnivores side by side, see this page:
Comparative Anatomy & Taxonomy
The link above also debunks the opportunistic feeder theory, which states that because humans can eat like omnivores, that we must therefore be omnivores. And this is of course false because mere behavior doesn’t indicate suitability. There are plenty of things we can do as a species that would threaten our survival if we all considered them suitable default behavior, such as shooting each other, lobbing hand grenades, or sending spam.