on 25-02-2015 10:23 AM
Australian Public Service bosses realised 95 years ago that equal rights for women in the workplace could transform the bureaucracy.
They then vowed to stop it happening.
The Royal Commission into Public Service Administration in 1920 found women were "physiologically" inferior to men in the workplace and "usually" had nervous breakdowns if given positions of responsibility.
Where similar duties are performed by men and women ... the experience throughout the world has been that equal services are not rendered owing to the fact that constitutionally women are unable to give such continuous effort as men and are absent from duty for health reasons to a far greater extent."
I'm pretty sure I read echoes of the same thinking on here just this morning.
on 25-02-2015 10:28 AM
on 25-02-2015 10:28 AM
lurker
You gave me a good laugh this morning.
From your link
"The Royal Commission into Public Service Administration in 1920 found women were "physiologically" inferior to men in the workplace and "usually" had nervous breakdowns if given positions of responsibility."
Haven't read anything so funny in ages.
"physiologically" inferior to men in the workplace"
Most work placs don't require you to be "physical".
25-02-2015 10:31 AM - edited 25-02-2015 10:32 AM
"The Royal Commission into Public Service Administration in 1920 found women were "physiologically" inferior to men in the workplace and "usually" had nervous breakdowns if given positions of responsibility.
Where similar duties are performed by men and women ... the experience throughout the world has been that equal services are not rendered owing to the fact that constitutionally women are unable to give such continuous effort as men and are absent from duty for health reasons to a far greater extent.""
Tell that to Maggie Thatcher !
She'd hit you with that hand bag of hers, the one that made most male Pollies quiver in their shoes.
Including Ronald Reagan
on 25-02-2015 10:32 AM
Well, that's good. You just gave me a LOL moment too. There are none so blind as those that cannot see.
on 25-02-2015 10:37 AM
@lurker172602 wrote:Well, that's good. You just gave me a LOL moment too. There are none so blind as those that cannot see.
Are you referring to "women were "physiologically" inferior to men in the workplace"
and my comment this morning about the female who couldn't pass the tests ?
And not commenting on it above ?
on 25-02-2015 10:52 AM
That is correct. My point being, that what may appear correct thinking at the time is often show by history to be blatantly incorrect.
Also, I have previously asked you not to contact me outside of the public sphere. I would ask you to respect that request. Thank you.
on 25-02-2015 11:00 AM
The fact is, some or the majority of women are "physiologically" inferior to men in SOME workplaces.
on 25-02-2015 11:09 AM
Women were deemed to be unsuited for jobs in the Clerical Division in the Public Service. Hardly physiologically challenging work.
on 25-02-2015 11:12 AM