'No, I Did Not Have Secks With That Girl'

[icyfroth]

Prince Andrew tonight issued a dramatic and unprecedented denial that he slept with the woman at the centre of the extraordinary under-age ‘sex slave’ scandal.

For the first time, Buckingham Palace made a robust rebuttal of the allegations by Virginia Roberts that she was forced to have sex with the Duke of York in London, New York and the Caribbean, starting when she was only 17.

Entire Article Here

I reckon he did, Those Royals are an oversexed bunch IMO.

I don't reckon she was "forced" though. Not physically anyway. Maybe by financial considerations.

[cmcoins2000]

---

@goldenjet16 wrote:
Lol.... Your on roll..... 🙂

---

Now whatever you do - do not mention hay.

[cherry*135]

Apart from who gives a flying fig, replies are a bit dubious/suss especially considering the topic/allegation of under age sex.

[icyfroth]

---

@am*3 wrote:
Apart from who gives a flying fig, replies are a bit dubious/suss especially considering the topic/allegation of under age sex.

---

I agree.

[polksaladallie]

Not under age in London or New York, and depends where in the Carribean.

Creepy because he is old enough to be her grandfather.

[dwilke33]

---

@horizon1907 wrote:

More to the point, who gives a flying f ? 

---

It's all dumb.  Who wants to respond? Kinda silly I say.

[cherry*135]

By Rajini Vaidyanathan, BBC Washington correspondent

While accusations are levelled against Prince Andrew, it's important to note that he is not party to the proceedings.

Instead he is named as part of evidence relating to a wider case of an alleged sex trafficking scheme, involving US businessman Jeffrey Epstein, who spent time in jail in 2008-9 for a sex offence with a minor.

Two women (known as Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2) are suing the US government, saying it failed to protect their rights when it entered into a plea deal with Epstein.

Now, two further women (Jane Doe #3 and #4) want to join this case, and it's Jane Doe #3 who has made claims against the Duke of York, as part of this.

The prince strongly denies the allegations. This is the first time they have surfaced publicly, and no legal case has been made against him on this matter.

[cherry*135]

"The woman known as Jane Doe 3 – said to be 30-year-old Virginia Roberts – claims she was held as a sex slave and forced to sleep with the Duke of York in London, New York and the US Virgin Islands.

She says she was 17 at the time – under the age of consent in Florida.

There is no suggestion that Prince Andrew knew Roberts was being held as a sex slave by the tycoon and she claims she first met the royal when the financier took her to Europe and North Africa in 2001.

[lind9650]

What is a 17 year old doing, travelling from London, New York and the Carribeans, supposedly employed as a Massage Therapist?

13 years ago one would not find a 17 year old to be so naive.

At that age she would have no qualifications in any kind of health service. And why has it taken her 13 years to start complaining?

Erica

[gleee58]

---

@lind9650 wrote:

What is a 17 year old doing, travelling from London, New York and the Carribeans, supposedly employed as a Massage Therapist?

13 years ago one would not find a 17 year old to be so naive.

At that age she would have no qualifications in any kind of health service. And why has it taken her 13 years to start complaining?

Erica

---

On the contrary, some 17 year old girls would be easily seduced by the prospect of "working" for and travelling with an obviously wealthy and sophisticated man who just happens to need a new massage therapist and offers up free "training".  On first thoughts it sounds like such a good offer. 

[bluecat*dancing]

If she is telling the truth, there are plenty of reasons why she waited so long. It can take almost a whole lifetime for the victims to reach a point in which they are mentally able to publicly state what had happened to them. Naivety is not genearation specific.