'No, I Did Not Have Secks With That Girl'

Prince Andrew tonight issued a dramatic and unprecedented denial that he slept with the woman at the centre of the extraordinary under-age ‘sex slave’ scandal.

For the first time, Buckingham Palace made a robust rebuttal of the allegations by Virginia Roberts that she was forced to have sex with the Duke of York in London, New York and the Caribbean, starting when she was only 17.


Entire Article Here

 

I reckon he did, Those Royals are an oversexed bunch IMO. Woman LOL

I don't reckon she was "forced" though. Not physically anyway. Maybe by financial considerations.

Message 1 of 93
Latest reply
92 REPLIES 92

'No, I Did Not Have Secks With That Girl'

 

The UK media is in a feeding frenzy at the moment.

 

I think the whole thing will start to unravel in a few months.

 

 

Message 71 of 93
Latest reply

'No, I Did Not Have Secks With That Girl'


@j*oono wrote:

Kate and Wills' wedding did remind me very much of Cinderella and her ugly sisters.


 

As I hae said before, who needs us (men) to denigrate women when you do such a good job of it between yourselves.

 

 

And you complain that you hate it when looks are taken above other things but then you go around

denigrating other women on their looks ??????

 

 

Message 72 of 93
Latest reply

'No, I Did Not Have Secks With That Girl'

I wonder why though. A big news story? Behind the scenes politics?

 

I always look for an ulterior motive lol.

 

Message 73 of 93
Latest reply

'No, I Did Not Have Secks With That Girl'

 

I think because he was actually named in the court papers, so it kind of gave the media a reason to publish.

 

It is or has been known about for ages, but I doubt anyone was game enough to publish, especially since the

Royals are now more likely than ever to use lawyers.

 

 

Like you, I also look for the reason, ulterior motive.

 

In this case, it sells newspapers !

 

 

Message 74 of 93
Latest reply

'No, I Did Not Have Secks With That Girl'

"And still more polular then most of the others added together." [Clinton]

If you want to call being known as a liar and a womanizer being popular.....

"He still married to Hillary."

Don't make me laugh.



I know I'm late to the party.......
Message 75 of 93
Latest reply

'No, I Did Not Have Secks With That Girl'


@polksaladallie wrote:

President Clinton (as he is still known) served as many terms as are possible.  No-one got rid of him.


Clinton was an amateur (at extra-marital wanderings) compared with Kennedy.  Didn't affect his popularity either.

Message 76 of 93
Latest reply

'No, I Did Not Have Secks With That Girl'


Clinton

If their was a hole, he'd poke it !

Ever since he was in Little Rock.

Message 77 of 93
Latest reply

'No, I Did Not Have Secks With That Girl'

"Clinton was an amateur (at extra-marital wanderings) compared with Kennedy. Didn't affect his popularity either."

Difference is Clinton got caught, he lied about it. Kennedy never flat out lied to the American public...

If that doesn't bother you then ok. Think what you want
Message 78 of 93
Latest reply

'No, I Did Not Have Secks With That Girl'

That's very strange because all politician tell Lies

 

Bet Kennedy lied to his Wife 🙂

Message 79 of 93
Latest reply

'No, I Did Not Have Secks With That Girl'

Clinton lied under Oath.... Big difference!!
Message 80 of 93
Latest reply