No country for old men - or women

I'm not sure that "most Australians" feel this way, but...........

 

http://www.independentaustralia.net/life/life-display/no-country-for-old-men--or-women,6138

 

The WHO estimates that by mid-century, two billion people will be over 60 years old — but rather than welcoming an abundance of wisdom, most Australians simply see a tsunami of cost, writes Lyn Bender.

 

THE ABBOTT GOVERNMENT has proven itself to be pretty much a dunce when it comes to understanding the complexity of humanity.

 

The current government takes a ham-fisted mechanistic approach when a nuanced organic sensitivity is required. It manages people and complex social issues — like bikes instead of, say, frogs. You may remove a wheel from a bike and replace it with another.

 

When you cut off a frog’s leg the whole organism ‒ like an ecosystem ‒ is damaged.

 

If the oldsters were like refugees and arriving in boats, there might have been a campaign to stop them. But instead, they lurk within our midst and future in the millions, lining up with their Zimmer frames and mobility aids to invade our overstretched services.

 

Indeed, since being elected treasurer, Joe Hockey has used the projected hoards of the elderly, and other welfare recipients, to invoke fear of budget catastrophes and health insurance explosions. A horrible fate is depicted and implied for us all as we age. We become the unattractive drain and burden on able-bodied taxpayers.

 

The pièce de résistance 'solution' is the suggestion that those receiving unemployment benefits could work for the dole in aged care facilities, thereby solving the problem with a 'genius stroke'.

 

This is no country for the unemployed, impoverished, or the vulnerable, nor for the physically and mentally disabled and those who have extra needs.

Message 1 of 29
Latest reply
28 REPLIES 28

Re: No country for old men - or women


@the_great_she_elephant wrote:
@lakeland27 wrote:

ooh, thats a slippery slope ..


You're right LL I am a firm believer in volutary euthanasia, but once you start linking it to economics: e.g.

 billions spent sending the cream of our youth to kill and die and more billions keeping the half-dead alive

 

Then you are putting your foot on a very slippery slope indeed.


I am also not anti voluntary euthanasia, for the terminally ill. It already happens, even though it is illegal. I don't think some countries are ready for it, for exactly the reason you have pointed out.

Message 21 of 29
Latest reply

Re: No country for old men - or women

"I suppose the ogre has left out the large percentage of the middle class who receive "welfare". Or of course her own rather enormous govt assistance."

 

Writing something does not make it so B1G,  thus some  evidence would help counter the bias.

"enormous govt assistance." ?

 

tax graph.JPG

 

"large percentage"?

nɥºɾ

 

Message 22 of 29
Latest reply

Re: No country for old men - or women

 When I read some of the comments posted on CS I have to smile and think to myself, gee, how very young you must be.

 

What age group do you consider young?  There are very few (if any) young people that post here (under 35/40?). 

Message 23 of 29
Latest reply

Re: No country for old men - or women


am*3 wrote:

 When I read some of the comments posted on CS I have to smile and think to myself, gee, how very young you must be.

 

What age group do you consider young?  There are very few (if any) young people that post here (under 35/40?). 


"Young" is a relative concept. Am, and I did say some posters.

 



 

Message 24 of 29
Latest reply

Re: No country for old men - or women

Why, when not agreeing with her views, is she being attacked about be fat, I dont see the relevance?

Message 25 of 29
Latest reply

Re: No country for old men - or women


@the_great_she_elephant wrote:

@am*3 wrote:

 When I read some of the comments posted on CS I have to smile and think to myself, gee, how very young you must be.

 

What age group do you consider young?  There are very few (if any) young people that post here (under 35/40?). 


"Young" is a relative concept. Am, and I did say some posters.

 

 


Yes you said some. It wasn't that I was asked about though..  it was the comment.. how very young you must be

 

Intrigued to know how young you think these people (what age group) are that make you smile and think that to yourself? 

 

Would it be cause any outrage, if I posted 'when I read some of the comments on CS, I have to smile and think to myself, gee, how very old you must be?

 

 

Message 26 of 29
Latest reply

Re: No country for old men - or women

i have no problem with voluntary suicide. i've had  a close friend and a close relative do it, not a Philip Nitskhe (?) in sight.

the friend was a victim of abuse that led to prison and moire abuse. the relative was in his 20's and for a number of reasons he considered to be sufficient cause did the same thing. he may have been incorrect in his reasoning, but that was essentially his choice to make. 

Message 27 of 29
Latest reply

Re: No country for old men - or women

Would it be cause any outrage, if I posted 'when I read some of the comments on CS, I have to smile and think to myself, gee, how very old you must be?

 

On the contrary, I'd take it as a compliment, Am - I'd assume you were referring to my profound wisdom. Smiley LOL

Message 28 of 29
Latest reply

Re: No country for old men - or women

it could also be taken as a description of a wrinkled, thick, pachydermal, countenance 🙂

I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
Message 29 of 29
Latest reply